Canonical edges, each carrying form and meaning history.
THE CHANGE ATLAS
WORD FAMILIES ↗EVERY REVIEWED EDGE / TWO HISTORIES EACH
FORM → MEANING → EVIDENCEHOW WORDS MOVE.
HOW MEANINGS MUTATE.
A global atlas of every reviewed transformation in the graph—from lost vowels and borrowed spellings to meanings narrowed, inverted, elevated, and remade.
EVERY TRANSFORMATION
IS A CLAIM.
Every edge names the linked forms, relationship, sound history, semantic history, scholar, confidence, chronology when known, and the sources that warrant it. Search the language of change without flattening it.
No reviewed edge is allowed to omit what changed in form.
No reviewed edge is allowed to omit what changed in meaning.
515 distinct sources support the edge ledger.
Named analyses remain attached instead of becoming anonymous fact.
Borrowing, inheritance, derivation, uncertainty, and more stay distinct.
SEARCH THE TRANSFORMATIONS
FOLLOW CHANGE ITSELF.
The atlas searches the exact reviewed prose and authoritative edge labels. It does not manufacture universal “sound laws” or semantic categories by guessing from descriptions.
SEMANTIC HISTORY
1025 EVIDENCE-BACKED CHANGES
The traditional limestone route and substrate alternatives do not yield a single secure deeper chain.
The graph stops at the live etymological dispute.
CONFIDENCE NOTEThe canonical calculus node preserves the separate common-substrate proposal.
No older form is promoted beyond the disputed reconstruction.
The graph stops at the live reconstruction dispute.
CONFIDENCE NOTEThe boundary prevents either reconstructed root shape from being treated as an attested word.
No older form is promoted beyond the disputed *skei- comparison.
The graph stops where the reviewed comparative analysis stops.
No older form is promoted beyond the disputed *skei- comparison.
The graph stops where the reviewed comparative analysis stops.
No older form is promoted beyond the disputed *skei- comparison.
The graph stops where the reviewed comparative analysis stops.
No older form is promoted beyond the disputed *skei- comparison.
The graph stops where the reviewed comparative analysis stops.
No older form is promoted beyond the disputed reconstruction.
The graph stops rather than laundering a contested root into certainty.
No older form is promoted beyond the disputed reconstruction.
The graph stops rather than laundering a contested root into certainty.
No older form is promoted beyond the disputed reconstruction.
The graph stops at the live reconstruction dispute.
No older form is promoted beyond the disputed reconstruction.
The graph stops at the live reconstruction dispute.
No older form is promoted beyond the reviewed *bher- reconstruction.
The carrying branch stops at its present comparative horizon.
No older form is promoted beyond the comparative *legh- horizon.
The site stops without treating the separate *leǵ- gather root or uncertain Latin comparison as an ancestor.
The graph stops beyond the competing reconstruction notations.
No deeper number-word is promoted as settled fact.
No older form is promoted beyond *meue-.
The emotion branch stops at its cited reconstruction while the icon branch stops separately at uncertain Greek prehistory.
No older form is promoted beyond the reconstructed salt family.
The graph stops before speculation while preserving the real path shared with Latin sāl and salary.
No older form is promoted beyond Greek eikōn because the proposed base is uncertain.
The image-and-likeness family reaches a stated evidentiary horizon.
CONFIDENCE NOTEA proposed Lithuanian comparison is reported as doubtful.
No deeper analysis of the toponym is promoted without dedicated Iranian and Central Asian onomastic review.
The graph stops at the geographic name rather than inventing a lexical root.
No older form is promoted beyond *meue-.
The standalone emotion dossier stops at its cited movement reconstruction.
No older form is promoted beyond the comparative *legh- horizon.
The graph stops without merging the unrelated poem, non-clerical, or past-tense homonyms.
No still deeper form is promoted beyond *qan-yaq in the reviewed kayak dossier.
The kayak lineage reaches the reviewed Proto-Eskimo formation and stops.
CONFIDENCE NOTEThe specialist article proposes a deeper base for qajaq, modeled in that dossier, while the English donor variety remains unresolved.
No deeper form is promoted beyond Proto-Oceanic *tampu.
The Māori dossier reaches the current reviewed comparative horizon.
No deeper form is promoted beyond Proto-Oceanic *tampu.
The Hawaiian dossier reaches the current reviewed comparative horizon.
No deeper form or semantic derivation direction is promoted beyond the documented Nahuatl word.
The graph preserves fruit-and-testicle polysemy without converting it into an unsupported naming event.
No deeper form is promoted beyond the reviewed Proto-Eskimo base.
The graph stops before speculative macro-family comparison.
READ THE EDGE, NOT JUST THE WORD
TWO HISTORIES TRAVEL TOGETHER.
Pronunciation, spelling, morphology, loss, insertion, adaptation, and regular historical development.
Narrowing, broadening, metaphor, social reanalysis, technical specialization, and meaning retained.
Attested forms, reconstructed forms marked by *, and explicit knowledge boundaries never share one certainty label.
Scholar, confidence, chronology, source stance, locator, and evidence note remain attached to the atomic edge.