Canonical edges, each carrying form and meaning history.
THE CHANGE ATLAS
WORD FAMILIES ↗EVERY REVIEWED EDGE / TWO HISTORIES EACH
FORM → MEANING → EVIDENCEHOW WORDS MOVE.
HOW MEANINGS MUTATE.
A global atlas of every reviewed transformation in the graph—from lost vowels and borrowed spellings to meanings narrowed, inverted, elevated, and remade.
EVERY TRANSFORMATION
IS A CLAIM.
Every edge names the linked forms, relationship, sound history, semantic history, scholar, confidence, chronology when known, and the sources that warrant it. Search the language of change without flattening it.
No reviewed edge is allowed to omit what changed in form.
No reviewed edge is allowed to omit what changed in meaning.
515 distinct sources support the edge ledger.
Named analyses remain attached instead of becoming anonymous fact.
Borrowing, inheritance, derivation, uncertainty, and more stay distinct.
SEARCH THE TRANSFORMATIONS
FOLLOW CHANGE ITSELF.
The atlas searches the exact reviewed prose and authoritative edge labels. It does not manufacture universal “sound laws” or semantic categories by guessing from descriptions.
SEMANTIC HISTORY
1025 EVIDENCE-BACKED CHANGES
Latin regere continues centum *h₃reg-.
Lead straight, direct, and rule preserve the reconstructed root field.
Modern rich continues Middle English riche through English spelling and sound history.
Power and wealth broaden across abundance, value, color, flavor, and intensity.
CHRONOLOGYMerriam-Webster reports use before the twelfth century.
Middle English riche continues Old English rīce while also receiving French-family influence represented separately.
Strong and powerful develop toward wealthy and abundant.
CHRONOLOGYAmerican Heritage reports both Old English and Old French inputs.
Old English rīce reflects Germanic *rīkja-.
The powerful or kingly adjective supports later wealth senses.
CHRONOLOGYThe Germanic form is reconstructed.
Germanic *rīkja- was borrowed from Celtic *rīg-yo-.
A kingly or powerful formation enters Germanic before the English and French branches.
CHRONOLOGYBoth donor and recipient forms are reconstructed.
Celtic *rīg-yo- belongs to lengthened-grade *rēg-.
The Celtic kingly formation specializes the Indo-European ruler branch.
CHRONOLOGYComparative morphology, not one dated borrowing token.
Middle English realme was reshaped under the influence of Old French reial, royal.
The kingdom noun becomes more visibly associated with the royal adjective without descending from it.
CHRONOLOGYMedieval analogical influence; no single reshaping date is asserted.
Old French reial continues Latin rēgālis through Romance sound and spelling history.
The kingly or royal adjective remains monarch-centered.
Old French riche reinforces Middle English riche alongside the inherited Old English branch.
The French wealth adjective converges with English power-and-wealth material.
CONFIDENCE NOTEThe source reports both inputs but does not quantify their relative contribution.
Old French riche continues a Germanic *rīkja- family form through historical borrowing.
Powerful and wealthy remain linked across the Germanic-to-Romance route.
CHRONOLOGYThe Germanic parent is reconstructed; Old French is attested.
Modern direct continues Middle English directen with loss of the infinitive ending and stabilized modern spelling.
Guiding, aiming, ordering, straightness, and immediacy expand across verb, adjective, and adverb functions.
CHRONOLOGYMerriam-Webster reports the verb in the fourteenth century.
Middle English directen was borrowed through Anglo-French directer in the verb route.
To guide or point crosses into English.
Anglo-French directer continues Latin dīrēctus through Romance verbal formation.
Straightened supplies directing and guiding senses.
Latin dīrēctus is the past participle of dīrigere.
What has been set straight becomes straight or directed.
Latin dīrigere contains regere beside the separately modeled dī-/dis- prefix.
Setting apart or into line specializes leading straight, guiding, and directing.
CONFIDENCE NOTEThe exact contribution of the prefix is not paraphrased as modern negation.
Proto-Celtic nominative *rīx-s develops to Old Irish rí, while genitive ríg preserves the stem consonant.
The king title remains a king noun through the Celtic sound changes.
CHRONOLOGYOld Irish is recorded in the early medieval period; Proto-Celtic is reconstructed.
Proto-Celtic *rīx-s reflects the Indo-European lengthened king grade *rēg-.
King remains the central meaning while Celtic raises inherited *ē to *ī and develops the final cluster.
CHRONOLOGYThe source gives *rīx-s and genitive *rīg-os from PIE *(h₃)rēg̑-.
Sanskrit rājā is the nominative singular of the consonant stem rājan-.
The inflected form and lexical stem both mean king rather than separate lexical ancestors.
CHRONOLOGYThe relation is grammatical morphology inside Sanskrit.
Sanskrit rājan- reflects the reconstructed suffixed king formation *rēg-en-.
King, ruler, sovereign, and chief preserve the ruler field.
CHRONOLOGYThe Sanskrit form is attested; the parent is reconstructed.
Reconstructed *rēg-en- is an n-stem formation on lengthened-grade *rēg-.
The suffix forms a king noun inside the ruler branch.
CHRONOLOGYComparative morphology rather than a dated word-formation event.
The English adjective direct is reported from Latin dīrēctus without requiring the Anglo-French verb stage.
Straight, undeviating, and immediate adjective senses enter beside the verbal guidance route.
CHRONOLOGYMerriam-Webster separates adjective from verb and adverb etymology.
Latin dīrigere contains dī-, a form of dis-, beside regere.
The prefix participates in the set-straight and direct formation without being equated to modern negation.
Middle English womman develops to modern woman with reduction of the unstressed final syllable and modern spelling.
The female-person compound remains the ordinary adult-female noun.
CHRONOLOGYRecorded before the twelfth century in English.
Old English wīfman contracts and assimilates into Middle English womman.
The compound remains a woman noun while its internal morphology becomes opaque.
READ THE EDGE, NOT JUST THE WORD
TWO HISTORIES TRAVEL TOGETHER.
Pronunciation, spelling, morphology, loss, insertion, adaptation, and regular historical development.
Narrowing, broadening, metaphor, social reanalysis, technical specialization, and meaning retained.
Attested forms, reconstructed forms marked by *, and explicit knowledge boundaries never share one certainty label.
Scholar, confidence, chronology, source stance, locator, and evidence note remain attached to the atomic edge.