*SET-U

GRAPH-WIDE SEARCH

MEASURE THE GRAPH ↗

NOT JUST A DICTIONARY LOOKUP

6 EVIDENCE COLLECTIONS

SEARCH
THE GRAPH.

Find a modern word—or search sideways through reconstructed roots, historical forms, meanings, languages, scholars, sources, claims, disputes, and witnesses.

WIKTIONARY VIA KAIKKI / WIKTEXTRACT

Imported dictionary evidence

SOURCE-IMPORTED · UNREVIEWED

These are source reports, not reviewed *SET-U ancestry. A list of templates or numbered etymologies is not an ancestor chain. Scholarly disagreements remain in the original source text.

35,981 English word records · 45,491 etymology sections in this online subset

PARTIAL ENGLISH COVERAGE · FULL CORPUS REMAINS LOCAL

3 source sections across 2 headwords matching “ob”. These are separate from the reviewed results below.

Open the permanent entry for ob →Open the permanent entry for Ob →
obEnglish (en) · Etymology 1Source text

From Latin ob, abbreviation of obolus.

Original Wiktionary entry and references ↗
obEnglish (en) · Etymology 3Source text
ObEnglish (en) · Etymology 1Source text

From Wiktionary contributors; extracted by Tatu Ylonen / Wiktextract / Kaikki.org. Extraction source · CC-BY-SA-4.0. Selected source text is reformatted for display; language and section identity are retained.

Source dump: 2026-10-01 · Extraction: 2026-10-30. These dates identify a dump snapshot, not an individual page revision.

Snapshot checksums and coverage
SOURCE SHA-256
5ff2c072f8099f2d2ce484bd6957bf179f046d2ad37bc36555edf8bb84cb5291
CORPUS SHA-256
c4c2a77325141846709230e11c2959332acd630d53e52905b72d36211251b081
IMPORT RUN
73216b9a9b78ed3830994bf853103716f5a4dc57099e371e9f8fdc468facca26
SUBSET SELECTION
English-only: shortest normalized query first, then binary lexical order; complete word-language and case-variant groups only. This is a bounded online subset, not the full acquired corpus.

INDEPENDENT SOURCE LIBRARY

More sources for this spelling

These are spelling matches, not a claim of identical senses or agreement. Historical accounts retain their own editions and limits; none is automatically promoted into reviewed ancestry.

Browse the independently attributed sources →
68REVIEWED RESULTS
12WORD DOSSIERS
8HISTORICAL NODES
12SOURCES
24CLAIMS
12WITNESSES
01

MODERN ENTRY POINTS

WORD DOSSIERS

12
verbdossier summary

exhume

To remove from burial or recover from obscurity; borrowed from Medieval Latin exhumare, literally a formation on ex, out of, and humus, earth.

OPEN THE FULL LINEAGE ↗
English noundossier summary

fiend

An inherited English noun whose earliest recorded sense was enemy or foe, not demon. Old English fēond belonged to a Germanic lexicalized one-who-hates formation; Middle English fẹ̄nd preserved enemy, Satan, demon, possession, and monster senses across extensive spelling variation; modern fiend continues the same English line. OED’s revised 2026 entry marks the literal enemy sense obsolete after the medieval record, explains the Devil as the ultimate Enemy, and documents long-versus-short vowel competition before the long vowel became dominant by the eighteenth century. The Middle English Dictionary independently exposes 188 quotations across eight senses without claiming a complete corpus.

OPEN THE FULL LINEAGE ↗
Swedish common-gender noundossier summary

fiende

The ordinary Swedish noun for an enemy, opponent, hostile state, or figurative threat continues Old Swedish fiande or fiände and an inherited Germanic present-participial formation: literally the hating one. Svenska Akademiens current dictionary calls the word Common Germanic and gives the original force hatande; SAOB and Hellquist independently derive the noun from the fi(j)- hate verb behind Gothic fijan and Old Norse fjá. Modern Swedish hata belongs to a separate Germanic hat- family, so fiende is not transparently built from the verb Swedish speakers now use for hate. Historical Swedish also used Fienden for the Devil, but that branch is not the word’s only or current central meaning. All medieval and early-modern examples here are source-reported lexical records, not directly inspected manuscript objects.

OPEN THE FULL LINEAGE ↗
Danish common-gender noundossier summary

fjende

Modern Danish fjende is the ordinary noun for a person, state, force, ideological opponent, or figurative thing that harms something else. Den Danske Ordbog derives it from Old Norse fjándi, compares German Feind, and identifies the older formation as a present participle of a verb corresponding to Old Norse fjá, to hate or persecute. Gammeldansk Ordbog records fiende broadly from 1100–1300. Ordbog over det danske Sprog preserves fiende, finde, and related spellings, an ordinary enemy sense, military and animal uses, abstract threats, and a special religious Devil branch. Holbergordbog shows that Fiende could still scan as either three syllables or two, alongside Fiænde, Finde, Fînde, and clipped Fiend. The word is therefore a grammatical fossil, not a current psychological definition: a lexicalized one-who-hates became the ordinary Danish enemy noun and accumulated broad contextual work. The current pronunciations are dictionary records, not retrojections into medieval Danish. No manuscript or print object is claimed as directly inspected.

OPEN THE FULL LINEAGE ↗
Old Norse verbdossier summary

fjá

Old Norse fjá was a verb meaning to hate. The Dictionary of Old Norse Prose classifies it as poetic and exposes zero prose citations; its glossarium links point to the early form fía and the reconstructed Proto-Germanic *fi(j)ēn-. Cleasby and Vigfússon call the verb obsolete, compare Gothic fijan and Old English feon or fjan, and locate it in Hýmiskviða 22 and Lokasenna 35, with the reflexive fjásk in Skírnismál 33. Fritzner independently gives the same three locations. The normalized verse texts preserve three different grammatical surfaces: goð fjá in Hýmiskviða, mangi fíár in Lokasenna, and Freyr fiásk in Skírnismál. Lexicon Poeticum likewise reports three poetic records, but explicitly warns that its concordance is unreviewed and that dates should be checked. These are source-reported lexical and edited-text records, not directly inspected manuscript objects, and three records in the reviewed poetic concordance are not a census of every Old Norse utterance. The finite verb became a tiny poetic fossil while its inherited participial relative fjándi became the ordinary enemy noun and accumulated 222 citations in ONP's prose corpus. Those corpus totals are not directly frequency-comparable, but the contrast makes the grammatical survival visible. The generated possible runic inscription shown by modern dictionary transcriptions is not historical evidence and is excluded. No historical sound recording exists, so the dossier does not fabricate one exact pronunciation.

OPEN THE FULL LINEAGE ↗
Old Norse masculine noundossier summary

fjándi

Old Norse fjándi is a masculine noun whose inherited shape still exposes a prehistoric agent formation. Cleasby and Vigfússon compare Gothic fiands, Old English feond, German Feind, Swedish fiende, and Danish fjende, identify the nd as participial, and gloss the older formation as properly a hater. They then distinguish the ordinary enemy sense from a post-Christian fiend development. The University of Copenhagen Dictionary of Old Norse Prose supplies 222 citations and six semantic zones: enemy or opponent; devil, monster, or demon; evil spirit; pagan god; the Devil or Satan; and a derogatory term for a hated or bewitched person, animal, or object. Lexicon Poeticum independently exposes 49 poetic records, including source-reported tenth-century enemy uses and later Christian fiend uses, while warning that its concordance and dates require checking. The noun therefore does not possess one timeless true meaning: an inherited lexicalized hater became an ordinary enemy word, and the branch later accumulated several demonic and derogatory senses. The displayed pronunciation is an editorial normalized approximation, not recorded historical audio. No underlying manuscript object is claimed as directly inspected in this dossier.

OPEN THE FULL LINEAGE ↗
Old English verbdossier summary

fēogan

An Old English verb meaning hate or persecute, recorded as FEÓGAN, feógean, fiógan, contracted feón and fión, with participle feógende and a broad present-and-past paradigm. Bosworth–Toller supplies examples whose objects include crimes, evil ways, law, peace, a temple, friends, and people. The verb continues reconstructed Proto-Germanic *fi(j)ēn-. Its active-participial formation lexicalized prehistorically as the enemy noun behind Old English fēond and modern fiend, but the verb, participle, and noun are not one interchangeable category.

OPEN THE FULL LINEAGE ↗
Old High German strong masculine noundossier summary

fīant

Old High German fīant—written fîant and fîjant in the Althochdeutsches Wörterbuch's length-marking convention—was already a strong masculine noun meaning enemy, opponent, or adversary. The dictionary documents personal, public and military, spiritual, and specifically Devil senses across a large variant and inflectional record. Its most revealing evidence is grammatical: in fixed formulas, usually without an article, the old participial character could still shine through. Fîant uuesan could mean to be hostile, hate someone, or wish someone ill; fîant mahhôn meant make hostile, and zi fîante tuon could mean regard as an enemy or hate. The companion fîên article independently preserves the live weak verb to hate in eighth- and ninth-century Alemannic manuscripts. The noun therefore shows a lexical fossil whose older verbal force remained locally legible without ceasing to be a noun. The displayed pronunciation is an editorial normalized approximation, not a recorded historical audio object. All displayed Old High German passages are inspected dictionary or text-edition records, not directly inspected manuscript objects.

OPEN THE FULL LINEAGE ↗
Old Dutch masculine noundossier summary

fīunt

Old Dutch fīunt is the normalized headword behind a twenty-six-occurrence historical-dictionary record for enemy or opponent. ONW classifies the noun as synchronically unsegmented but says it was originally the present participle of the verb corresponding to Old High German fīēn and Gothic fijan, a verb no longer known in Dutch. Its frequency table preserves six case-number cells: nominative and genitive singular plus nominative, genitive, dative, and accusative plural. Those are not a complete paradigm. The article displays twenty representative location blocks after warning that locations in the semantic profile have been reduced. Most early Wachtendonck Psalms material is linguistically dated 901–1000 but survives in copies dated 1595–1605, circa 1598, or 1701–1800; no tenth-century manuscript object was inspected. One dfiunt or fiunt gloss aligned with Latin diabolus is textually disputed, and one Groningen psalm gloss is explicitly assigned to Old Frisian by the dictionary. This dossier therefore treats fīunt as a nominal fossil with a partially preserved inflectional record, not as a productive Old Dutch participle or a complete transparent paradigm.

OPEN THE FULL LINEAGE ↗
Old High German weak verbdossier summary

fīēn

Old High German fīēn—printed fîên in the Althochdeutsches Wörterbuch—was a weak verb meaning to hate, not love, be hostile to, detest, or reject. The official dictionary says it is attested only in Alemannic manuscripts of the eighth and ninth centuries, then inventories an infinitive fien, present participle fiendi, second-person singular preterite fietos, and accusative plural masculine past participle fieta. Three rule-text records concern hating discipline, one’s own will, or no person; gloss records align the participial forms with Latin exosus or exosos; and an Esther gloss aligns fien with detestari. These are source-reported edition and dictionary records, not directly inspected manuscript objects, and the broad manuscript horizon does not identify one exact first token. A separate twelfth-century article printed fien [sic] with the gloss ubere is explicitly left uninterpreted by the dictionary and is not merged into this hate verb. Beside the verb, Old High German had the already lexicalized enemy noun fīant, whose old participial character could still shine through in fixed phrases. The graph therefore shows a living daughter verb beside a grammatical fossil without pretending that either attested form is the reconstructed Proto-Germanic word itself. No historical sound recording exists and the dossier does not display a fabricated phonetic certainty.

OPEN THE FULL LINEAGE ↗
noun · verbhistorical form

hate

An inherited Germanic hostility word whose English noun and verb histories converge imperfectly: Old English preserves both hete and hatian, Middle English may have remodeled the noun from the verb, and the proposed deeper Indo-European family remains semantically opaque.

OPEN THE FULL LINEAGE ↗
Old Frisian weak verbcontrarian claim

hatia

Old Frisian hatia is a weak verb whose lexicographic field extends beyond an inward feeling. Hofmann and Popkema give hate or reject, damage, and a feud-language expression for harming or pursuing someone as an enemy. A May 2026 Corpus Oudfries search for word or lemma hatia returns six records in 235,462 tokens, but those are not six instances of this verb. Buma's critical note on Brokmer B 101 explicitly identifies its written hatia as atia "rear" with prothetic h, and Nijdam translates the passage as a poor mother being unable to feed her children. That token is excluded from the hate lineage. The five relevant corpus records occur in legal, road, family, and theological contexts: forms hatijen, hatie, hata, and hatien can concern harming or hindering on a road, a writing or event going against someone, or God hating perjury, lying speech, and false witnesses. The current corpus count is a bounded research surface, not a frequency estimate for medieval speech or a claim about every surviving witness. The underlying manuscripts were not directly inspected for this dossier, no earliest-use claim is made, and no exact historical pronunciation is invented.

OPEN THE FULL LINEAGE ↗
02

ATTESTED / RECONSTRUCTED / BOUNDARY

HISTORICAL FORMS

8
03

WHERE INTERPRETATION IS TESTED

CLAIMS & DISPUTES

24

SCHOLARLY DISPUTES / 12

openprobableposition text

Is the exact phonetic shape of *fi(j)and- directly known?

No. The form is a comparative reconstruction. Optional j notation, branch vowels, and the relation of written historical variants require analysis rather than direct Proto-Germanic observation.

openprobableposition text

Does the English record begin in the 13th or 14th century?

The reviewed reports differ. Etymonline gives an early-thirteenth-century algorism; Merriam-Webster gives a fourteenth-century first-known-use horizon.

openprobableposition text

Does the English record begin in the 13th or 15th century?

The reviewed source reports differ. Etymonline gives mid-thirteenth-century arsmetike; Merriam-Webster gives a fifteenth-century first-known-use horizon.

openprobableposition text

What is the earliest surviving use of cais in either sense?

Not established here. eDIL supplies located citations but the underlying objects and dates were not normalized or directly inspected for an earliest-use audit.

openproposedposition text

Is Latin calculus securely a diminutive of calx?

No. Festus accepted the traditional limestone derivation, but the phonology and meanings are problematic. The edge remains proposed.

openprobableposition text

Was Portuguese chá borrowed specifically from Cantonese or from Mandarin?

WALS gives a Cantonese cha route through Macao; Infopédia labels the source Mandarin chá. The shared cha-type Chinese family is secure, but the immediate variety label is not unanimous.

openprobableposition text

Does the con- in conscience mean together or intensively?

Both analyses are published. Merriam-Webster presents com- plus scire, while American Heritage labels com- intensive; the dossier keeps the edge probable rather than forcing one exclusive gloss.

openestablishedposition text

Was emoticon first used in 1987 or only by 1992?

Merriam-Webster reports first known use in 1987; Etymonline reports the word by January 1992 and quotes an August 1992 explanation.

openprobableposition text

Does the specialist title begin in 1604 or the 1630s?

Merriam-Webster reports 1604; Etymonline reports the 1630s. These are different source horizons, not necessarily irreconcilable claims about the same underlying object.

openprobableposition text

Can the nd-ending alone distinguish enemy from one who hates?

No. Galatians 4:16 nominative fijands functions as the noun enemy, Romans 11:28 accusative fijandans is analyzed as a participle, and Romans 12:9 fiandans takes an accusative object. Twenty-one other corpus tokens remain explicitly lexically and morphosyntactically ambiguous.

openestablishedposition text

What is the exact earliest surviving fjá token?

Not established here. The reviewed sources supply poem and stanza locations but no directly inspected manuscript object, exact composition date, or uncontested first-use year.

openestablishedposition text

Was fjá obsolete at one exact medieval date?

No. Cleasby calls the word obsolete from a nineteenth-century lexicographic perspective, but the reviewed record does not identify a last speaker or extinction year.

CONTRARIAN TRUTHS / 12

RANK 11GRADE Aranked reveal

It was never humanity’s universal ancient name for spiritual practitioners.

English globalized a specific Evenki term through European scholarship and applied it to many unrelated traditions.

RANK 12GRADE Aranked reveal

A Turkish word is not proof of who invented the food.

English yogurt is Turkish yoğurt, probably related to yoğur- “knead”; the origin of fermented milk is a different historical question.

RANK 34GRADE Aranked reveal

The Devil entered English as the Enemy—and the enemy was a fossilized hater.

OED’s revised history identifies fiend as an inherited Germanic noun made from the present participle of the hate verb. Old English fēond meant enemy and foe as well as Devil; OED explains Satan as the ultimate Enemy and marks the literal enemy sense obsolete after the medieval period. Cotton MS Vitellius A XV still visibly preserves feondes in a concrete foe’s-footprint scene at Beowulf 2289.

RANK 35GRADE Aranked reveal

A fiend was an enemy before it was a demon.

OED’s revised history starts with enemy or foe and explains the Devil as the ultimate Enemy. The English noun continues Old English fēond, itself inherited from a Germanic lexicalized one-who-hates formation. Middle English then preserves enemy, Satan, demon, possession, and monster senses together before the literal enemy sense becomes obsolete.

RANK 37GRADE Aranked reveal

Swedish fiende is not built from modern hata.

SO says fiende originally meant hatande. SAOB and Hellquist make the hidden grammar explicit: the enemy noun is a lexicalized present participle of the Germanic fi(j)- verb, literally one who hates. But SAOB’s separate hata article places the modern Swedish hate verb in the hat- family. Swedish therefore carries two different Germanic hate histories side by side: one fossilized inside the everyday noun enemy, the other alive as the everyday verb hata.

RANK 51GRADE Aranked reveal

Care, grief, funerals, and in-laws occupy one Greek noun—but hate does not secretly mean care.

LSJ's κῆδος entry moves through care and concern, anxiety and grief, troubles, mourning and funeral rites, an object of care, and connection by marriage. Homeric κήδεʼ can be many-troubled woes; Aeschylus can make Helen an object of care while playing on marriage affinity. Comparative sources then place the noun beside Celtic and Germanic hatred words under *ḱh₂d-es- and *ḱeh₂d-. The reveal is not a mystical reversal in which hate “really” means care. Merriam-Webster calls the semantic relations far from transparent, Liberman challenges the wider family's unity, and the Greek evidence itself resists a single linear story.

RANK 59GRADE A-contrarian claim

Old Norse hatr has a 54-to-1 grammar problem.

The University of Copenhagen’s Dictionary of Old Norse Prose separates a 54-citation neuter noun from a one-citation masculine analysis—and flags the lone masculine assignment as possibly an elementary error. A directly inspected c.1150-1200 manuscript visibly preserves Hatr, but a visible token cannot settle gender by itself. The reveal is not that Old Norse had two equally secure hate nouns; it is that rigorous lexicography preserves the fracture instead of hiding it.

RANK 66GRADE Acontrarian claim

The borrowed name is part of the object’s history.

English kimchi directly continues Korean 김치; the graph refuses a deeper arrow until specialist evidence supports one.

RANK 77GRADE Acontrarian claim

Same sound, same object, different ancestry.

Turkish kayık reaches Old Turkic kayguk; kayak reaches Inuit qayaq. Their uncanny agreement is chance resemblance, not evidence of contact or a common root.

RANK 86GRADE Aranked reveal

Origin does not get the last word.

Calling something “etymological” describes its historical analysis; it does not make an obsolete sense more correct than a word’s established current meaning.

RANK 89GRADE Aranked reveal

The host could also be the guest.

Latin hospes carried reciprocal host-and-guest roles. The opposition feels fixed in modern English, but the historical hospitality relationship could reverse when obligations were returned.

04

BOOKS / DICTIONARIES / ARTICLES / DATABASES

SOURCES

12
historical dictionary35 CLAIM LINKS

Svenska Akademiens ordbok — FIENDE

Svenska Akademiens ordboksredaktion / 1924

source titleAUDIT EVERY USE ↗
historical dictionary32 CLAIM LINKS

Deutsches Wörterbuch von Jacob Grimm und Wilhelm Grimm — hassen

Jacob Grimm · Wilhelm Grimm · DWDS editorial team / 2026

author or editorAUDIT EVERY USE ↗
historical dictionary23 CLAIM LINKS

Liddell–Scott–Jones Greek-English Lexicon — κῆδος

Henry George Liddell · Robert Scott · Henry Stuart Jones · Scaife ATLAS editors / 1940

author or editorAUDIT EVERY USE ↗
historical dictionary19 CLAIM LINKS

Deutsches Wörterbuch von Jacob Grimm und Wilhelm Grimm — feind, m.

Jacob Grimm · Wilhelm Grimm · Trier Center for Digital Humanities / 2025

author or editorAUDIT EVERY USE ↗
historical dictionary16 CLAIM LINKS

Deutsches Wörterbuch von Jacob Grimm und Wilhelm Grimm — Freund

Jacob Grimm · Wilhelm Grimm / 1878

author or editorAUDIT EVERY USE ↗
historical dictionary16 CLAIM LINKS

Deutsches Wörterbuch von Jacob Grimm und Wilhelm Grimm — hasz, m.

Jacob Grimm · Wilhelm Grimm · DWDS editorial team / 2026

author or editorAUDIT EVERY USE ↗
historical dictionary10 CLAIM LINKS

ἔτυμος — A Greek-English Lexicon

Henry George Liddell · Robert Scott · Henry Stuart Jones / 1940

author or editorAUDIT EVERY USE ↗
digital critical edition8 CLAIM LINKS

Electronic Beowulf, Fifth Edition

Kevin Kiernan, editor and designer · Emil Iacob, software engineer / 2026

author or editorAUDIT EVERY USE ↗
scholarly dictionary8 CLAIM LINKS

Etymological Dictionary of Greek

Robert S. P. Beekes / 2010

author or editorAUDIT EVERY USE ↗
historical dictionary8 CLAIM LINKS

Robot — Word History

Merriam-Webster Editors / 2026

source titleAUDIT EVERY USE ↗
historical dictionary7 CLAIM LINKS

Middelnederlandsch Woordenboek — VRIENT I

Eelco Verwijs · Jacob Verdam · Instituut voor de Nederlandse Taal / 1929

author or editorAUDIT EVERY USE ↗
historical dictionary6 CLAIM LINKS

-rē̆de(n suffix — Middle English Dictionary

Robert E. Lewis et al. · Frances McSparran et al. / 2001

author or editorAUDIT EVERY USE ↗
05

FIRST USES & HISTORICAL OBJECTS

ATTESTATION WITNESSES

12
DIRECTLY INSPECTEDprinted book

The e-rara object record and searchable scan locate John Harris's dictionary definition of algorithm.

algorithm / algorithm / 1704

Lexicon technicum: or, an universal English dictionary of arts and sciencesreporting source / OPEN RECORD ↗
DIRECTLY INSPECTEDprinted book

The photographed English title page prints the plural headword in “Rossum's Universal Robots.”

robot / robot / 1923

R.U.R. (Rossum's Universal Robots): A Fantastic Melodramawitness excerpt / OPEN RECORD ↗
SOURCE REPORTEDlexical corpus record

Otfried, friends addressed directly

friunt / Freund / ninth century, source-reported

Deutsches Wörterbuch von Jacob Grimm und Wilhelm Grimm — Freundreporting source / OPEN RECORD ↗
SOURCE REPORTEDlexical corpus record

Otfried, beloved friends

friunt / Freund / ninth century, source-reported

Deutsches Wörterbuch von Jacob Grimm und Wilhelm Grimm — Freundreporting source / OPEN RECORD ↗
SOURCE REPORTEDlexical corpus record

Iwein, best friend

vriunt / Freund / circa 1200, source-reported

Deutsches Wörterbuch von Jacob Grimm und Wilhelm Grimm — Freundreporting source / OPEN RECORD ↗
SOURCE REPORTEDlexical corpus record

Iwein, Gawain as best friend

vriunt / Freund / circa 1200, source-reported

Deutsches Wörterbuch von Jacob Grimm und Wilhelm Grimm — Freundreporting source / OPEN RECORD ↗
SOURCE REPORTEDlexical corpus record

Matthias von Beheim, Matthew 5:11

haʒʒen / hassen / 1343 textual horizon, source-reported

Deutsches Wörterbuch von Jacob Grimm und Wilhelm Grimm — hassenreporting source / OPEN RECORD ↗
SOURCE REPORTEDlexical corpus record

Matthias von Beheim, John 5:16

haʒʒen / hassen / 1343 textual horizon, source-reported

Deutsches Wörterbuch von Jacob Grimm und Wilhelm Grimm — hassenreporting source / OPEN RECORD ↗
SOURCE REPORTEDlexical corpus record

German Bible enemy proverb

Feind / Feind / 1483

Deutsches Wörterbuch von Jacob Grimm und Wilhelm Grimm — feind, m.witness excerpt / OPEN RECORD ↗
SOURCE REPORTEDlexical corpus record

Early New High German proverb record

Haß / hasz / Hass / 1560

Deutsches Wörterbuch von Jacob Grimm und Wilhelm Grimm — hasz, m.reporting source / OPEN RECORD ↗
SOURCE REPORTEDlexical corpus record

Agricola, Sprichwörter

hassen / hassen / 1560

Deutsches Wörterbuch von Jacob Grimm und Wilhelm Grimm — hassenreporting source / OPEN RECORD ↗
SOURCE REPORTEDlexical corpus record

Hobbes translation of Aristotle, explicit love definition

friend / friend / before 1637, source-reported

Oxford English Dictionary — friend, n. & adj.reporting source / OPEN RECORD ↗
06

SEARCH IS DISCOVERY, NOT PROOF

EVERY RESULT OPENS A PERMANENT EVIDENCE RECORD.

Matching text only locates a record. It does not raise confidence, settle a dispute, establish cognacy, or turn a source report into direct inspection. Follow the result into its citations and editorial limits.