*SET-U

GRAPH-WIDE SEARCH

MEASURE THE GRAPH ↗

NOT JUST A DICTIONARY LOOKUP

6 EVIDENCE COLLECTIONS

SEARCH
THE GRAPH.

Find a modern word—or search sideways through reconstructed roots, historical forms, meanings, languages, scholars, sources, claims, disputes, and witnesses.

WIKTIONARY VIA KAIKKI / WIKTEXTRACT

Imported dictionary evidence

SOURCE-IMPORTED · UNREVIEWED

These are source reports, not reviewed *SET-U ancestry. A list of templates or numbered etymologies is not an ancestor chain. Scholarly disagreements remain in the original source text.

35,981 English word records · 45,491 etymology sections in this online subset

PARTIAL ENGLISH COVERAGE · FULL CORPUS REMAINS LOCAL

4 source sections across 1 headword matching “Dig”. These are separate from the reviewed results below.

Open the permanent entry for dig →
digEnglish (en) · Etymology 1Source text

From Middle English diggen (“to dig”, 13th c.), an alteration of dīken, from Old English dīcian (“to dig a ditch, mound up earth”), from Proto-West Germanic *dīkōn, which see for cognates. This verb is denominal from Proto-Germanic *dīkaz (“pool, puddle; dyke, ditch”), from Proto-Indo-European *dʰeygʷ- (“to stab, dig”). The form with g may have been influenced by Old French *diguer, a variant of dikier, itself from the West Germanic verb above. French forms with g are attested only in the 15th c., thus 200 years later than in English. On the other hand, French has according forms also for the underlying noun (cf. digue) and the phonetic development is more plausible in French than in English.

Original Wiktionary entry and references ↗
digEnglish (en) · Etymology 2Source text

From African American Vernacular English; due to lack of writing of slave speech, etymology is difficult to trace, but it has been suggested that it is from Wolof dëgg, dëgga (“to understand, to appreciate”). It has also been suggested that it is from Irish dtuig, thus being a doublet of twig. Others do not propose a distinct etymology, instead considering this a semantic shift of the existing English term (compare dig in/dig into).

Original Wiktionary entry and references ↗
digEnglish (en) · Etymology 3Source text
digEnglish (en) · Etymology 4Source text

Unknown. Compare Middle English digge.

Original Wiktionary entry and references ↗

From Wiktionary contributors; extracted by Tatu Ylonen / Wiktextract / Kaikki.org. Extraction source · CC-BY-SA-4.0. Selected source text is reformatted for display; language and section identity are retained.

Source dump: 2026-10-01 · Extraction: 2026-10-30. These dates identify a dump snapshot, not an individual page revision.

Snapshot checksums and coverage
SOURCE SHA-256
5ff2c072f8099f2d2ce484bd6957bf179f046d2ad37bc36555edf8bb84cb5291
CORPUS SHA-256
c4c2a77325141846709230e11c2959332acd630d53e52905b72d36211251b081
IMPORT RUN
73216b9a9b78ed3830994bf853103716f5a4dc57099e371e9f8fdc468facca26
SUBSET SELECTION
English-only: shortest normalized query first, then binary lexical order; complete word-language and case-variant groups only. This is a bounded online subset, not the full acquired corpus.

INDEPENDENT SOURCE LIBRARY

More sources for this spelling

These are spelling matches, not a claim of identical senses or agreement. Historical accounts retain their own editions and limits; none is automatically promoted into reviewed ancestry.

Browse the independently attributed sources →
53REVIEWED RESULTS
12WORD DOSSIERS
4HISTORICAL NODES
12SOURCES
24CLAIMS
1WITNESSES
01

MODERN ENTRY POINTS

WORD DOSSIERS

12
nouncontrarian claim

aguacate

The Spanish word for the avocado tree and fruit, borrowed from Nahuatl āhuacatl, whose historical records include both fruit and testicle senses.

OPEN THE FULL LINEAGE ↗
Old English verbdossier summary

fēogan

An Old English verb meaning hate or persecute, recorded as FEÓGAN, feógean, fiógan, contracted feón and fión, with participle feógende and a broad present-and-past paradigm. Bosworth–Toller supplies examples whose objects include crimes, evil ways, law, peace, a temple, friends, and people. The verb continues reconstructed Proto-Germanic *fi(j)ēn-. Its active-participial formation lexicalized prehistorically as the enemy noun behind Old English fēond and modern fiend, but the verb, participle, and noun are not one interchangeable category.

OPEN THE FULL LINEAGE ↗
Old English strong masculine nd-agent noundossier summary

fēond

An Old English enemy, foe, and Devil noun inherited from the Germanic lexicalized present-participial formation *fi(j)and-. OED’s revised 2026 entry treats fēond and fīond as dialectal Old English forms, documents i-mutated fīend and fȳnd inside the inherited nd-stem inflection, and traces the word through a highly variable Middle English record into modern fiend. Bosworth–Toller supplies the Old English paradigm and examples; the Middle English Dictionary independently reports 188 quotations across eight senses. Cotton MS Vitellius A XV folio 180v was directly inspected at Beowulf 2289, where feondes modifies fotlast, the foe’s footprint.

OPEN THE FULL LINEAGE ↗
Old Dutch masculine noundossier summary

fīunt

Old Dutch fīunt is the normalized headword behind a twenty-six-occurrence historical-dictionary record for enemy or opponent. ONW classifies the noun as synchronically unsegmented but says it was originally the present participle of the verb corresponding to Old High German fīēn and Gothic fijan, a verb no longer known in Dutch. Its frequency table preserves six case-number cells: nominative and genitive singular plus nominative, genitive, dative, and accusative plural. Those are not a complete paradigm. The article displays twenty representative location blocks after warning that locations in the semantic profile have been reduced. Most early Wachtendonck Psalms material is linguistically dated 901–1000 but survives in copies dated 1595–1605, circa 1598, or 1701–1800; no tenth-century manuscript object was inspected. One dfiunt or fiunt gloss aligned with Latin diabolus is textually disputed, and one Groningen psalm gloss is explicitly assigned to Old Frisian by the dictionary. This dossier therefore treats fīunt as a nominal fossil with a partially preserved inflectional record, not as a productive Old Dutch participle or a complete transparent paradigm.

OPEN THE FULL LINEAGE ↗
nouncontrarian claim

hammock

The suspended-bed sense entered English through Spanish hamaca from Taíno hamaca; it is etymologically separate from the southern U.S. terrain word hammock.

OPEN THE FULL LINEAGE ↗
Gothic neuter nouncontrarian claim

hatis

A Gothic noun conventionally glossed hate, hatred, anger, or wrath. Project Wulfila reports fifteen corpus tokens in three surface forms: hatis, hatiza, and hatize. Its fourteen biblical tokens translate Greek wrath vocabulary rather than supplying a clean mirror of modern personal dislike: Streitberg maps the family chiefly to orgē, assigns Galatians 5:20 to thumos, and leaves Ephesians 4:31 unresolved because both Greek nouns stand together. The visible Gothic paradigm is also historical evidence: Project Wulfila treats hatis as a neuter a-stem, while Fulk analyzes it as an inherited i-stem transferred to the a-stems.

OPEN THE FULL LINEAGE ↗
Gothic class-I weak-verb lemmacontrarian claim

hatjan

A Gothic weak verb meaning hate, represented by exactly one verified corpus token: the present participle hatjandam in Matthew 5:44. Project Wulfila lemmatizes that token as class-I hatjan, while the parallel Luke 6:27 command uses class-III hatandans from hatan. Braune treats the two shapes as conjugational fluctuation; Orel and the current corpus keep distinct formations visible. The normalized infinitive, the written participle, and the reconstructed parent are therefore never collapsed.

OPEN THE FULL LINEAGE ↗
Old Saxon class-II weak verbhistorical form

hatōn

The normalized Old Saxon weak-verb lemma hatōn is supported by a four-locus dictionary inventory: Heliand 1451 writes infinitive hatan in manuscript M and haton in manuscript C; Heliand 4915 writes genitive-plural present-participial hatandiero in M and hettendero in C; manuscript C supplies preterite hatoda at Heliand 5423; and GlG supplies infinitive haton aligned with Latin odisse. Those are six witness readings at four cited loci, not six independent lexemes or four manuscripts. The first Munich infinitive and the Munich hatandiero locus were directly inspected. The category problem is deeper than spelling: Köbler also indexes the Heliand 4915 forms under the separate agent noun hėttiand, enemy. The record therefore exposes the exact point where a live participial form and a lexicalized enemy noun overlap. It does not prove that pursue was the root meaning, that every enemy hates, or that every indexed form belongs unambiguously to one synchronic category.

OPEN THE FULL LINEAGE ↗
Old High German weak-verb citation formcontrarian claim

hazzōn

An Old High German citation form in the inherited Germanic hate-verb family, printed beside hazzēn and spelling variants hazēn, hazōn, haʒʒēn, and haʒʒōn. Starling’s source record dates hazzēn to the eighth century and hazzōn to the ninth; Duden and Grimm’s DWB group the ēn and ōn forms in the history of German hassen. Corpus-wide research independently shows that some Old High German class-III ēn verbs also occur with class-II ōn forms, but the accessible abstract does not establish that hazzōn is one of its twenty repeatedly attested double forms. DWB reports haʒôn aligned with Latin aemulari and the forms hatamas and hatent with insequamur and insequuntur. Those reports support an action range involving following or hostile pursuit; they are not directly inspected manuscript tokens. Pokorny’s account, as transmitted by Starling, explicitly warns that the Germanic evidence does not prove “pursue” was the root’s basic meaning. The route therefore distinguishes the normalized headword, the combined historical variants, the reconstructed Germanic weak verb and noun family, the qualified Indo-European comparison, and the point where knowledge ends.

OPEN THE FULL LINEAGE ↗
verbdossier summary

humiliate

To reduce someone in their own or others’ estimation, causing shame or loss of dignity; from Late Latin forms meaning to make low or humble.

OPEN THE FULL LINEAGE ↗
nouncontrarian claim

jaguar

English jaguar, recorded by 1604, came through Portuguese from Tupi jawára, whose range was broader than the modern zoological species label.

OPEN THE FULL LINEAGE ↗
nouncontrarian claim

kayak

An English borrowing recorded in 1757 from Inuit qayaq, the name of the Indigenous Arctic watercraft; the reviewed English source does not identify one specific Inuit language variety.

OPEN THE FULL LINEAGE ↗
02

ATTESTED / RECONSTRUCTED / BOUNDARY

HISTORICAL FORMS

4
03

WHERE INTERPRETATION IS TESTED

CLAIMS & DISPUTES

24

SCHOLARLY DISPUTES / 12

openprobableposition text

Can the exact Proto-Germanic pronunciation and paradigm be recovered?

Not completely. Comparative forms support the morphology, but no recording or written Proto-Germanic paradigm survives.

openprobableposition text

Can the exact Proto-Germanic pronunciation and inflection be recovered?

Not completely. OED reconstructs vowel contraction and formal variation, but no recording or written Proto-Germanic paradigm survives.

openprobableposition text

Can the exact Proto-Germanic pronunciation and full paradigm be recovered?

Not completely. Comparative evidence supports the nd-participial morphology, but no written paradigm or recording survives.

openprobableposition text

Are hatan and hatjan two Gothic verbs or one fluctuating paradigm?

The sources preserve different analytical levels. Project Wulfila gives separate class-III and class-I lemmas; Orel publishes distinct comparative formations. Braune says hatan fluctuates with class-I hatjan, while Sturtevant proposes a specifically Gothic secondary explanation.

openprobableposition text

Are hatjan and hatan two Gothic verbs or one fluctuating paradigm?

The located scholarship does not collapse to one answer. Project Wulfila gives separate class-I and class-III lemmas; Orel publishes distinct Germanic formations. Braune says hatan fluctuates between class III and class I, and Wright lists both under the same gloss.

openprobableposition text

Was the weak verb formed directly from *hatiz-?

The weak verb and Old Saxon heti belong to the same inherited family, but the exact formation direction and chronology among noun, weak-verb paradigms, and agent noun remain reconstructed.

openprobableposition text

Were hazzēn and hazzōn separate unrelated verbs?

That is not established. Dictionaries group both forms under the history of hassen, while corpus-wide scholarship shows that ēn verbs can acquire ōn double forms. The exact relationship for this lexeme still requires token-level paradigm study.

openprobableposition text

Can the exact Proto-Germanic pronunciation and paradigm be recovered?

Not completely. The participial reconstruction is well supported, but no recorded Proto-Germanic token or full paradigm survives.

resolvedestablishedposition text

Is modern fiende still a productive Swedish participle?

No. SO and SAOB classify current fiende as a noun. The participial origin is historical and lexicalized.

resolvedestablishedposition text

Are frīend and frȳnd separate friend words?

No. OED explains them as inherited i-mutated inflectional forms, with some analogical re-formation possible elsewhere in the paradigm.

resolvedestablishedposition text

Are fēogan and feón separate hate verbs?

No secure split is modeled. Bosworth–Toller links feón directly as a similar entry and the full paradigm lists feón among fēogan’s contracted variants.

resolvedprobableposition text

Is feógende automatically the noun fēond?

No. Feógende is the productive Old English participle listed in the verb paradigm. Fēond is a lexicalized nd-agent noun inherited from the prehistoric formation.

CONTRARIAN TRUTHS / 12

RANK 27GRADE Aranked reveal

The Old English verb survives most visibly as an enemy.

The located weak-verb corpus inventory gives hettan only one form: hettende. Bosworth–Toller records that surface family repeatedly under hettend, “enemy” or “antagonist,” including Genesis and the Phoenix. The verb is therefore not a neat recovered paradigm; it is a lemma inferred at the edge between action, agent, and lexicalized foe.

RANK 30GRADE Aranked reveal

Gothic hatis—the noun related to English hate—survives chiefly as wrath, including the wrath to come and the wrath of God.

Project Wulfila reports fifteen tokens in hatis, hatiza, and hatize. Fourteen are biblical; Streitberg maps the family chiefly to Greek orgē, gives Galatians 5:20 thumos, and flags Ephesians 4:31 because both stand together. Codex Argenteus folio 129r directly preserves hatiza in “the wrath to come.” Even the paradigm resists simplification: synchronic neuter a-stem, historically an i-stem remodeled into it.

RANK 46GRADE Acontrarian claim

Old High German hazzōn is a paradigm fault line, not proof that hate originally meant pursue.

The clean dictionary headword conceals paired ēn and ōn forms: Starling reports hazzēn in the eighth century and hazzōn in the ninth, Duden prints haʒʒēn and haʒʒōn, and the UT reflex index also records hazēn and hazōn. Corpus-wide research confirms that Old High German ēn verbs can show ōn double forms. DWB reports aemulari and insequi alignments that support emulation, following, or hostile pursuit—but Pokorny’s comparative warning is exact: Germanic evidence does not prove that pursue was the root’s basic meaning. The normalized form, the source-reported tokens, the paradigm analysis, and the prehistoric semantic claim are four different evidence layers.

RANK 47GRADE Aranked reveal

The Old Dutch enemy noun outlived the hate verb that created it.

ONW counts twenty-six fīunt occurrences across six attested case-number cells, yet classifies the noun as synchronically unsegmented and says the corresponding hate verb is no longer known in Dutch. Comparative evidence reconstructs the noun as an old present-participial formation: the hating one. The grammar therefore preserves a fossil in nominative, genitive, dative, and accusative records after Dutch lost the living verb that once made the formation transparent. Six cells are evidence, not a complete paradigm; the early Psalms records survive in later copies; and the lone Devil gloss is disputed.

RANK 57GRADE Aranked reveal

The verb disappeared from ordinary English; its prehistoric hater survived as fiend.

Old English fēogan meant hate or persecute and had a productive paradigm including feógende. The Germanic active-participial formation had already lexicalized as an enemy noun before the recorded branches. English therefore preserves the family most visibly not in its ordinary verb hate, but in fēond and modern fiend.

RANK 65GRADE Aranked reveal

A borrowed word can encode a category that English flattens.

Navajo hooghan means home or house within Diné life; English hogan should not be generalized into a label for any Indigenous dwelling.

RANK 67GRADE Acontrarian claim

The Indigenous route is real scholarship—but not a closed case.

English securely borrowed Louisiana French bayouque. Early Choctaw *bayok is plausible, while the oft-repeated bayuk form and its contraction to modern bók remain insecure.

RANK 68GRADE Acontrarian claim

The brand and species name began as a broader Indigenous predator word.

Portuguese carried Tupi jawára into English, where a broad large-carnivore label became the name of Panthera onca.

RANK 119GRADE Aranked reveal

Lady is not the feminine form of lord.

Old English hlǣfdige shares lord’s loaf component but pairs it with a kneading element, not guardian.

RANK 123GRADE Aranked reveal

Loaf is the word inside both lord and lady.

Old English hlāf continues as loaf and is also the exact historical bread component shared by hlāford and hlǣfdige.

RANK 135GRADE Aranked reveal

Humiliate is historically to make low.

Late Latin humiliāre means to make low or humble and grows from humilis, low or near the ground, which is formed from humus, earth. Modern shame and loss of dignity sit on that lowering history.

RANK 164GRADE Acontrarian claim

The bed word is Indigenous Caribbean—and its English look-alike is unrelated.

Hammock came through Spanish hamaca from Taíno hamaca. The southern U.S. terrain noun has a separate etymology.

04

BOOKS / DICTIONARIES / ARTICLES / DATABASES

SOURCES

12
historical dictionary21 CLAIM LINKS

An Icelandic-English Dictionary — fjándi

Richard Cleasby · Guðbrandur Vigfússon / 1874

publisherAUDIT EVERY USE ↗
historical dictionary20 CLAIM LINKS

An Icelandic-English Dictionary — FRÆNDI

Richard Cleasby · Guðbrandur Vigfússon / 1874

publisherAUDIT EVERY USE ↗
historical dictionary19 CLAIM LINKS

Deutsches Wörterbuch von Jacob Grimm und Wilhelm Grimm — feind, m.

Jacob Grimm · Wilhelm Grimm · Trier Center for Digital Humanities / 2025

author or editorAUDIT EVERY USE ↗
historical dictionary18 CLAIM LINKS

A Concise Anglo-Saxon Dictionary — hete and related entries

John R. Clark Hall / 1916

publisherAUDIT EVERY USE ↗
historical dictionary16 CLAIM LINKS

Deutsches Wörterbuch von Jacob Grimm und Wilhelm Grimm — Freund

Jacob Grimm · Wilhelm Grimm / 1878

publisherAUDIT EVERY USE ↗
historical dictionary14 CLAIM LINKS

An Icelandic-English Dictionary — fjá

Richard Cleasby · Guðbrandur Vigfússon / 1874

publisherAUDIT EVERY USE ↗
historical dictionary14 CLAIM LINKS

An Icelandic-English Dictionary — hatr

Richard Cleasby · Guðbrandur Vigfússon · Sampo Silvennoinen digital edition / 1874

author or editorAUDIT EVERY USE ↗
historical grammar11 CLAIM LINKS

Grammar of the Gothic Language — glossary entries hatan, hatis, hatizōn, and hatjan

Joseph Wright / 1910

publisherAUDIT EVERY USE ↗
historical dictionary10 CLAIM LINKS

Die gotische Bibel — Wörterbuch entry hatis

Wilhelm Streitberg / 1910

publisherAUDIT EVERY USE ↗
historical dictionary10 CLAIM LINKS

ἔτυμος — A Greek-English Lexicon

Henry George Liddell · Robert Scott · Henry Stuart Jones / 1940

publisherAUDIT EVERY USE ↗
historical dictionary9 CLAIM LINKS

An Icelandic-English Dictionary — hata

Richard Cleasby · Guðbrandur Vigfússon / 1874

publisherAUDIT EVERY USE ↗
digitized primary source9 CLAIM LINKS

Heliand — BSB Cgm 25, scan 41, folio 20r, heti locus

Bayerische Staatsbibliothek · Münchener DigitalisierungsZentrum / 875

author or editorAUDIT EVERY USE ↗
05

FIRST USES & HISTORICAL OBJECTS

ATTESTATION WITNESSES

1
06

SEARCH IS DISCOVERY, NOT PROOF

EVERY RESULT OPENS A PERMANENT EVIDENCE RECORD.

Matching text only locates a record. It does not raise confidence, settle a dispute, establish cognacy, or turn a source report into direct inspection. Follow the result into its citations and editorial limits.