BIBLIOGRAPHIC IDENTITYmdz-cgm25-scan41-heti

SOURCE
RECORD.

One work. Every claim that depends on it. No citation without a consequence you can inspect.

CLAIM-LEVEL USAGE

11 PUBLIC LINKS INTO THE GRAPH.

This count excludes duplicate dossier-path citations. Open the claims below to see exactly how the source is used.

digitized primary sourcemdz-cgm25-scan41-heti

Heliand — BSB Cgm 25, scan 41, folio 20r, heti locus

AUTHOR / EDITOR: Bayerische Staatsbibliothek · Münchener DigitalisierungsZentrum
YEAR: 875
PUBLISHER: Bayerische Staatsbibliothek
DOI: Not recorded
SOURCE TYPE: digitized primary source
EXTERNAL RECORD: OPEN ORIGINAL ↗

0CANONICAL EDGES

1WITNESSES

0COMPARISONS

0CONTEXT LINKS

1RANKED REVEALS

7DISPUTES

2JOURNEY STAGES

2WORD DOSSIERS

CONTRARIAN TRUTH CLAIMS

RANKED REVEALS THAT CITE THIS SOURCE

RANK 49GRADE Asupports

The token is attested even though the dictionary headword wears an asterisk.

Köbler heads the Old Saxon noun hėti* but lists written accusative and dative heti plus genitive hetias beneath it. The exact Munich Heliand token is directly visible in the clause rîkioro manno heti endi harmquidi. The dictionary count three also hides a second distinction: it means three lexical loci, while Heliand 1322 survives with M, C, and V readings, producing five reported witness readings across the dossier. The star therefore belongs to an editorial headword layer; it does not erase the attested surface or turn Old Saxon into Proto-Germanic. The visible Heliand context is endured hostility or persecution, while the Saxon Confession groups hetias with malice, envy, and slander. Even the inherited grammar stays open: Fulk and Köbler use an i-stem analysis, whereas Pfeifer calls the wider noun an old es/os-stem.

*ḱeh₂d-

*ḱeh₂d- → *ḱh₂d-es- → *hatiz- → heti

Cgm 25 scan 41, folio 20r, line containing rikioro manno heti

Directly verifies the attested Munich surface and its immediate phrase.

heti dossier ↗truth record ↗89UNVEILING

SCHOLARLY DISAGREEMENT

DISPUTE POSITIONS THAT CITE THIS SOURCE

resolvedsupportsestablished

Is Old Saxon heti itself attested?

Yes. Köbler reports accusative and dative singular heti, and the exact Munich Heliand 1322 token is visible in Cgm 25 folio 20r.

Cgm 25 scan 41, folio 20r, Heliand 1322

Directly verifies the written Munich token.

heti dossier ↗dispute record ↗

resolvedsupportsestablished

Was the Munich heti token directly inspected?

Yes. The full-resolution MDZ image of Cgm 25 scan 41 was visually checked against the dictionary and LWL transcription.

Full-resolution Cgm 25 scan 41

Provides the directly inspected artifact.

heti dossier ↗dispute record ↗

resolvedsupportsestablished

Does the representative year 875 prove a first use of heti?

No. The Heliand work is earlier than the Munich copy, and other witnesses have distinct or unresolved object dates. The numeric year only positions a second-half ninth-century manuscript.

Item metadata and scan 41

Separates the second-half ninth-century object date from the work and token history.

heti dossier ↗dispute record ↗

resolvedsupportsestablished

Does Heliand 1322 use heti only for a private feeling?

No. Köbler gives Latin persecutio for the Heliand use, and the visible clause says righteous people endure powerful men's heti and harmquidi. The noun functions in an external hostility or persecution setting.

Cgm 25 folio 20r, line containing heti endi harmquidi

Directly verifies the noun inside the endured-hostility clause.

heti dossier ↗dispute record ↗

resolvedsupportsestablished

Can heti be pinned to one exact birthplace?

No. The Heliand poetic origin is unresolved, its witnesses traveled through distinct manuscript contexts, and the Genesis and confession records are not one production event.

Cgm 25 catalog attribution and witness image

Provides one manuscript location without identifying the lexeme's origin.

heti dossier ↗dispute record ↗

resolvedcontextestablished