*SET-U

CANONICAL LANGUAGE GRAPH

TRACE A WORD ↗
NODE / 1287attestedOld Saxon

hatan

TRANSLITERATION hatan

to hate in the quoted enemy command; wider paradigm also glossed pursue

DATE
Munich Heliand manuscript, second half of the ninth century
SENSE
hate verb manuscript spelling
FAMILY
Indo-European / West Germanic
CANONICAL KEY
node:92:hatan:attested:sense:hate-verb-manuscript-spelling

The exact infinitive hatan is directly visible in Cgm 25 scan 45 at Heliand 1451. Köbler places it under normalized hatōn beside manuscript-C haton, participial hatandiero or hettendero, preterite hatoda, and a glossarial haton. The exact queue candidate is therefore a represented spelling, not a second lexeme.

01

ANCESTRAL EDGES

ROOT OF THIS ROOT

1
GO DEEPERcompeting inheritanceproposed
Proto-Germanic · Proto-Germanic reconstruction alternatives · hate class three reconstruction

*xatēnan ~ *xatōjanan

reconstructed class-III or related weak verbs meaning hate

SOUND
Old Saxon h continues the Germanic fricative represented by Orel as x, while the attested ō-class paradigm is compared with reconstructed weak-verb alternatives. Orel prints *xatēnan ~ *xatōjanan; Köbler prints *hatōn.
MEANING
The inherited Germanic hostility verb continues as Old Saxon hate or, in lexicographic description, pursue. The evidence does not establish pursuit as the one earlier or original meaning.
CHRONOLOGY
Proto-Germanic reconstruction into the Old Saxon Heliand and gloss record.
SCHOLAR
Vladimir Orel · Gerhard Köbler · University of Texas Linguistics Research Center
CONFIDENCE
proposed — The branch lexeme and cross-Germanic family are secure, but reconstruction notation, weak-verb subclass history, and the semantic center vary by source.
02

DIRECT DESCENDANT EDGES

THE NEXT HISTORICAL STEP

1
DESCENDANTorthographic variantestablished
Old Saxon · Old Saxon Heliand and smaller-monument record · hate pursue old saxon lemma

hatōn

to hate; in lexicographic description, also pursue

SOUND
The normalized lemma hatōn abstracts over written infinitive hatan in Munich manuscript M and haton in manuscript C. The macron and final-vowel normalization are editorial analyses; this edge does not claim that one token changed directly into the other.
MEANING
No meaning change is assigned. Both infinitive readings belong to the same reviewed hate verb, while their object dates and manuscript identities remain separate.
CHRONOLOGY
Normalized dictionary lemma over ninth- and tenth-century written evidence.
SCHOLAR
Gerhard Köbler · University of Texas Linguistics Research Center · SET-U manuscript review
CONFIDENCE
established — Köbler explicitly prints hatōn as the entry and hatan or haton as the Heliand 1451 manuscript readings. The Munich hatan pixels were directly inspected.
03

TRANSITIVE DESCENDANT CLOSURE

EVERY REVIEWED BRANCH FROM HERE

1

This is the complete downstream closure currently supported by the canonical graph. Every displayed step is a real reviewed edge with its own sound claim, meaning claim, scholar, confidence, and citations.

UNIQUE DESCENDANT NODES
1
REVIEWED EDGES
1
DEEPEST PATH
1
MODERN DOSSIERS REACHED
1
HISTORICAL STEP 011 EDGE
STEP 01orthographic variantestablished
SOUND
The normalized lemma hatōn abstracts over written infinitive hatan in Munich manuscript M and haton in manuscript C. The macron and final-vowel normalization are editorial analyses; this edge does not claim that one token changed directly into the other.
MEANING
No meaning change is assigned. Both infinitive readings belong to the same reviewed hate verb, while their object dates and manuscript identities remain separate.
Gerhard Köbler · University of Texas Linguistics Research Center · SET-U manuscript review3 CITATIONSEDGE 1253 ↗

“Every” means every descendant in the reviewed SET-U graph. It does not convert missing scholarship or missing ingestion into a claim of historical completeness. The coverage ledger remains the honest denominator.

04

RECORDED EVIDENCE

ATTESTATIONS / FIRST KNOWN USE

6
05

EDITORIAL REUSE

WORD DOSSIERS USING THIS NODE

1