*SET-U

CANONICAL LANGUAGE GRAPH

TRACE A WORD ↗
NODE / 1286attestedOld Saxon

hatōn

TRANSLITERATION hatōn

to hate; in lexicographic description, also pursue

DATE
Old Saxon Heliand and smaller-monument record
SENSE
hate pursue old saxon lemma
FAMILY
Indo-European / West Germanic
CANONICAL KEY
node:92:haton:attested:sense:hate-pursue-old-saxon-lemma

Köbler normalizes the class-II weak verb as hatōn and assigns it a four-locus inventory. The macron and lemma shape are editorial normalization rather than one uniquely written manuscript form.

01

ANCESTRAL EDGES

ROOT OF THIS ROOT

1
GO DEEPERorthographic variantestablished
Old Saxon · Munich Heliand manuscript, second half of the ninth century · hate verb manuscript spelling

hatan

to hate in the quoted enemy command; wider paradigm also glossed pursue

SOUND
The normalized lemma hatōn abstracts over written infinitive hatan in Munich manuscript M and haton in manuscript C. The macron and final-vowel normalization are editorial analyses; this edge does not claim that one token changed directly into the other.
MEANING
No meaning change is assigned. Both infinitive readings belong to the same reviewed hate verb, while their object dates and manuscript identities remain separate.
CHRONOLOGY
Normalized dictionary lemma over ninth- and tenth-century written evidence.
SCHOLAR
Gerhard Köbler · University of Texas Linguistics Research Center · SET-U manuscript review
CONFIDENCE
established — Köbler explicitly prints hatōn as the entry and hatan or haton as the Heliand 1451 manuscript readings. The Munich hatan pixels were directly inspected.
02

DIRECT DESCENDANT EDGES

THE NEXT HISTORICAL STEP

0

No reviewed descendants currently reuse this node. Absence describes the graph, not the entire history of the form.

03

TRANSITIVE DESCENDANT CLOSURE

EVERY REVIEWED BRANCH FROM HERE

0

This is the complete downstream closure currently supported by the canonical graph. Every displayed step is a real reviewed edge with its own sound claim, meaning claim, scholar, confidence, and citations.

UNIQUE DESCENDANT NODES
0
REVIEWED EDGES
0
DEEPEST PATH
0
MODERN DOSSIERS REACHED
0

No downstream edge has cleared review for this node. This is a graph-coverage statement, not a claim that the historical form produced nothing.

“Every” means every descendant in the reviewed SET-U graph. It does not convert missing scholarship or missing ingestion into a claim of historical completeness. The coverage ledger remains the honest denominator.

04

RECORDED EVIDENCE

ATTESTATIONS / FIRST KNOWN USE

0
NO RECORDED WITNESS ATTACHED.

The reviewed graph does not yet attach a source-reported or directly inspected witness to this canonical form.

05

EDITORIAL REUSE

WORD DOSSIERS USING THIS NODE

1