PERMANENT SOURCE RECORD
ALL SOURCES ↗BIBLIOGRAPHIC IDENTITYcleasby-vigfusson-hata
SOURCE
RECORD.
One work. Every claim that depends on it. No citation without a consequence you can inspect.
9 PUBLIC LINKS INTO THE GRAPH.
This count excludes duplicate dossier-path citations. Open the claims below to see exactly how the source is used.
historical dictionarycleasby-vigfusson-hata
An Icelandic-English Dictionary — hata
- AUTHOR / EDITOR
- Richard Cleasby · Guðbrandur Vigfússon
- YEAR
- 1874
- PUBLISHER
- Clarendon Press · digital transcription
- DOI
- Not recorded
- SOURCE TYPE
- historical dictionary
- EXTERNAL RECORD
- OPEN ORIGINAL ↗
010
CONTRARIAN TRUTH CLAIMS
RANKED REVEALS THAT CITE THIS SOURCE
No ranked contrarian reveal currently cites this source.
025
SCHOLARLY DISAGREEMENT
DISPUTE POSITIONS THAT CITE THIS SOURCE
opensupportsproposed
Was shun the original meaning of hata?
Not established. Cleasby and Vigfússon propose that the poetic dative shun sense was probably original, then immediately say hatta with double t may be the better reading.
Poetic dative sense and original-sense proposal; immediate hatta caveatPublishes both the proposal and its textual objection.
opensupportsproposed
Does hata gulli simply mean hate gold?
Not securely. Cleasby treats the dative phrase as spend gold, ONP has a separate prose contempt-for-gold record, and the poetic reading itself is questioned.
hata gulli, spend gold; reading caveatPublishes the poetic formula and dispute.
resolvedsupportsestablished
Was Old Norse hata a verb?
Yes. ONP marks hata vb. with the weak stem [-að-], and Cleasby, Zoëga, and Fritzner independently classify the lemma as a verb.
Headword hata, active and reflexive grammarIndependently documents the verb.
resolvedsupportsestablished
Are the possible runic inscriptions on modern dictionary pages historical attestations?
No. They are generated transliteration widgets without an object, inscription identifier, shelfmark, or historical locator.
Modern page widget: possible runic inscriptionShows the generated display lacks a historical object citation.
resolvedsupportsestablished
Is hatask a separate unrelated verb?
No on the reviewed evidence. ONP and Cleasby treat the middle-voice, reflexive, and reciprocal constructions inside the hata paradigm.
Reflexive and reciprocal hata constructionsIndependently documents the grammar.
031
CANONICAL RELATIONSHIP CLAIMS
EDGES THAT CITE THIS SOURCE
EDGE 1223contextprobable
hata → *xatēnan ~ *xatōjanan
Old Norse → Proto-Germanic · inheritance
- SOUND
- Old Norse h continues the Germanic fricative Orel writes x, while the weak-verb stem and North Germanic inflection produce the attested hata paradigm. The reviewed sources do not expose one complete dated series of intermediate spoken forms.
- MEANING
- The inherited hostility verb is distributed across persecution, rejection, humiliation, hate, damage or destruction, participial, and reciprocal constructions. Dictionary sense order is not promoted as a chronological semantic path.
- SCHOLAR / EDITOR
- Vladimir Orel · Dictionary of Old Norse Prose editors · Johan Fritzner
Headword hata and Germanic cognate listSupplies active, reflexive, reciprocal, and participial Old Norse grammar.
040
LEXICAL ATTESTATIONS
WITNESSES REPORTED BY THIS SOURCE
No lexical witness currently cites this source.
053
COMPARATIVE EVIDENCE
COGNATES, DESCENDANTS, AND RELATIVES
060
GEOGRAPHIC AND TEMPORAL CLAIMS
JOURNEY STAGES THAT CITE THIS SOURCE
No journey-stage claim currently cites this source.
070
NON-GENEALOGICAL CONNECTIONS
HISTORICAL CONTEXT, KEPT SEPARATE
No non-genealogical context link currently cites this source.
081
WORD-FAMILY REUSE
DOSSIERS THAT DEPEND ON THIS SOURCE
1 entry-scoped citations map reviewed dossier paths onto the canonical claims above.