PERMANENT SOURCE RECORD
ALL SOURCES ↗BIBLIOGRAPHIC IDENTITYstreitberg-hatis
SOURCE
RECORD.
One work. Every claim that depends on it. No citation without a consequence you can inspect.
10 PUBLIC LINKS INTO THE GRAPH.
This count excludes duplicate dossier-path citations. Open the claims below to see exactly how the source is used.
historical dictionarystreitberg-hatis
Die gotische Bibel — Wörterbuch entry hatis
- AUTHOR / EDITOR
- Wilhelm Streitberg
- YEAR
- 1910
- PUBLISHER
- Carl Winter · Project Wulfila digital edition
- DOI
- Not recorded
- SOURCE TYPE
- historical dictionary
- EXTERNAL RECORD
- OPEN ORIGINAL ↗
012
CONTRARIAN TRUTH CLAIMS
RANKED REVEALS THAT CITE THIS SOURCE
RANK 30GRADE Asupports
Gothic hatis—the noun related to English hate—survives chiefly as wrath, including the wrath to come and the wrath of God.
Project Wulfila reports fifteen tokens in hatis, hatiza, and hatize. Fourteen are biblical; Streitberg maps the family chiefly to Greek orgē, gives Galatians 5:20 thumos, and flags Ephesians 4:31 because both stand together. Codex Argenteus folio 129r directly preserves hatiza in “the wrath to come.” Even the paradigm resists simplification: synchronic neuter a-stem, historically an i-stem remodeled into it.
*ḱeh₂d-
*ḱeh₂d- → *ḱh₂d-es- → *hatiz- → hatis
p. 55, Greek-equivalent and case distribution for hatisPublishes the chiefly orgē pattern, the Galatians thumos exception, and Ephesians ambiguity.
hatis dossier ↗truth record ↗89UNVEILING
RANK 45GRADE Acontext
One Gothic anger verb survives in one question—and not in its dictionary form.
Project Wulfila’s complete current inventory contains one hatizōn token: hatizoþ in John 7:23, “are you angry at me?” Codex Argenteus folio 94v directly preserves the inflection. The manuscript never writes the normalized infinitive or its editorial macron. Grammar then reveals another layer: hatizōn is a class-II verb built from the consonantal stem hatiz- of hatis “hatred” or “wrath.” One English gloss therefore hides a noun-to-verb formation, one surviving grammatical person, and a sharp boundary between pixels and reconstruction.
*ḱeh₂d-
*ḱeh₂d- → *ḱh₂d-es- → *hatiz- → hatis → hatizōn
p. 55, hatizōn and John 7:23Connects the historical dictionary entry to the surviving verse.
hatizōn dossier ↗truth record ↗89UNVEILING
024
SCHOLARLY DISAGREEMENT
DISPUTE POSITIONS THAT CITE THIS SOURCE
openchallengesprobable
How should Ephesians 2:3 hatize and hatis be parsed?
The witnesses disagree in form and the analytical layers disagree in labeling. Project Wulfila’s current morphology lists A hatize as genitive plural and B hatis as nominative or accusative singular; Braune calls B hatis a consonantal genitive beside A hatizē, while Streitberg’s later teaching glossary calls genitive hatis erroneous.
p. 55, genitive hatis B beside -ize A; teaching glossary marks genitive hatis erroneousPreserves a later pedagogical judgment that prevents false closure.
opensupportsprobable
Does Galatians 5:20 prove hatis always meant explosive anger?
No single verse can establish an invariant meaning. Galatians aligns plural hatiza with Greek thumoi, while other biblical contexts use orgē and Ephesians 4:31 does not permit a clean one-to-one choice. The exact semantic center of ordinary Gothic remains underdetermined by translation texts.
p. 55, thumos only at Galatians 5:20; otherwise orgē with Ephesians 4:31 doubtfulDemonstrates why one verse cannot define the entire semantic field.
resolvedsupportsestablished
Does Gothic hatis simply mean the modern emotion hate?
No. Hatred remains a legitimate dictionary gloss, but the surviving biblical tokens do different translation work: Streitberg maps the noun chiefly to Greek orgē, maps Galatians 5:20 to thumos, and flags Ephesians 4:31 because both Greek wrath nouns are adjacent.
p. 55, hatis: thumos in Galatians 5:20; otherwise orgē; Ephesians 4:31 doubtfulPublishes the contextual Greek-equivalent distribution rather than a single timeless gloss.
resolvedsupportsestablished
What does the surviving token mean in context?
It asks whether the audience is angry at Jesus. Project Wulfila aligns hatizoþ with Greek χολᾶτε and English “are ye angry at me”; Streitberg and Wright gloss the verb with anger rather than a general act of hating.
p. 55, hatizōn and John 7:23Supplies Streitberg’s lexical gloss and verse locator.
032
CANONICAL RELATIONSHIP CLAIMS
EDGES THAT CITE THIS SOURCE
EDGE 1132supportsprobable
hatis → *hatiz-
Gothic → Proto-Germanic · inheritance
- SOUND
- Proto-Germanic *hatiz- is represented by Gothic hatis word-finally and by the stem hatiz- before a vowel-initial ending, visible in hatiza. Gothic then regularizes the inherited i-stem into neuter a-stem inflection.
- MEANING
- The inherited anger or hostility noun becomes the Gothic translation choice for Greek wrath vocabulary. That contextual specialization does not prove the noun lacked hatred senses elsewhere.
- SCHOLAR / EDITOR
- R. D. Fulk · John T. Koch · Project Wulfila editors
p. 55, hatis (z), full case-and-context inventoryPublishes the hatis, hatiza, and hatize paradigm and its Greek translation equivalents.
EDGE 1237contextestablished
hatizōn → hatis
Gothic → Gothic · derivation
- SOUND
- The consonantal stem hatiz- of hatis receives the class-II weak-verb formation represented by the citation form hatizōn and the written second-person plural hatizoþ. The long ō is an editorial phonological representation, not a separate manuscript letter.
- MEANING
- A noun for hatred, wrath, or anger supplies a verb whose one surviving context means be angry with or at someone. One token does not establish whether the verb ever carried the noun’s entire semantic range.
- SCHOLAR / EDITOR
- Todd B. Krause · Jonathan Slocum · Joseph Wright · Wilhelm Streitberg · Project Wulfila editors
p. 55, hatizōn and John 7:23Supplies Streitberg’s historical dictionary entry underlying the current lemma record.
040
LEXICAL ATTESTATIONS
WITNESSES REPORTED BY THIS SOURCE
No lexical witness currently cites this source.
052
COMPARATIVE EVIDENCE
COGNATES, DESCENDANTS, AND RELATIVES
060
GEOGRAPHIC AND TEMPORAL CLAIMS
JOURNEY STAGES THAT CITE THIS SOURCE
No journey-stage claim currently cites this source.
070
NON-GENEALOGICAL CONNECTIONS
HISTORICAL CONTEXT, KEPT SEPARATE
No non-genealogical context link currently cites this source.
082
WORD-FAMILY REUSE
DOSSIERS THAT DEPEND ON THIS SOURCE
3 entry-scoped citations map reviewed dossier paths onto the canonical claims above.