*SET-U

THE TIMELINE ATLAS

JOURNEY ATLAS ↗

FORM / ROUTE / BOUND

1398 REVIEWED EVENTS

LANGUAGE
IN TIME.

One cross-word chronology for every defensibly bounded form and journey stage—without converting a vague historical label into a fake year.

1398BOUNDED EVENTS

820 canonical forms + 578 route stages.

4500 BCEEARLIEST ENCODED BOUND

A reviewed graph bound, not a claim of an earliest human word.

578NORMALIZED JOURNEY STAGES

Only stages with directly cited numeric bounds enter this atlas.

381JOURNEY DATES WITHHELD

Labels remain visible in Journey Atlas, but not parsed into false years.

00

FILTER THE CHRONOLOGY

WHEN DID THE EVIDENCE LAND?

1398 MATCHING EVENTS
THE TEMPORAL CONTRACT

TWO CLOCKS.
NO FALSE PRECISION.

FORM CHRONOLOGY dates a canonical linguistic form or reconstruction in the lexical graph.

ROUTE CHRONOLOGY dates a geographic or transmission stage in a word’s journey.

They can share an era band, but they are never silently treated as the same kind of claim.

01

CROSS-WORD CHRONOLOGY / EARLIEST BOUND FIRST

THE EVIDENCE IN TIME

PAGE 21 / 47
Medieval30 ON THIS PAGE
830 CE–999 CErange
CANONICAL FORMOld Saxon

hōti

Old Saxon Heliand record

hostile, inimical, or enraged

9 EVIDENCE LINKS

Canonical form chronology encoded in the reviewed lexical graph.

AUDIT RECORD ↗
842 CE–1400 CErange
ROUTE STAGENorthern France

-logy

Old French -logie

The Latin learned element continues in Old French before reaching Middle English.

1 EVIDENCE LINK

The bounds identify the conventional Old French stage rather than one dated borrowing event.

AUDIT RECORD ↗
842 CE–1400 CErange
CANONICAL FORMOld French

-al

Old French period

adjective-forming suffix

2 EVIDENCE LINKS

Canonical form chronology encoded in the reviewed lexical graph.

AUDIT RECORD ↗
842 CE–1400 CErange
CANONICAL FORMOld French

-iser / -izer

Old French period

verb-forming suffix

2 EVIDENCE LINKS

Canonical form chronology encoded in the reviewed lexical graph.

AUDIT RECORD ↗
842 CE–1400 CErange
CANONICAL FORMOld French

regal

Old French

royal, kingly

3 EVIDENCE LINKS

Canonical form chronology encoded in the reviewed lexical graph.

AUDIT RECORD ↗
842 CE–1400 CErange
CANONICAL FORMOld French

reiame

Old French

kingdom, government

2 EVIDENCE LINKS

Canonical form chronology encoded in the reviewed lexical graph.

AUDIT RECORD ↗
842 CE–1400 CErange
CANONICAL FORMOld French

reial

Old French

royal

2 EVIDENCE LINKS

Canonical form chronology encoded in the reviewed lexical graph.

AUDIT RECORD ↗
842 CE–1400 CErange
CANONICAL FORMOld French

riche

Old French

rich, wealthy

3 EVIDENCE LINKS

Canonical form chronology encoded in the reviewed lexical graph.

AUDIT RECORD ↗
842 CE–1400 CErange
CANONICAL FORMOld French

femele

Old French

female

3 EVIDENCE LINKS

Canonical form chronology encoded in the reviewed lexical graph.

AUDIT RECORD ↗
842 CE–1400 CErange
CANONICAL FORMOld French

humain

Old French

human

2 EVIDENCE LINKS

Canonical form chronology encoded in the reviewed lexical graph.

AUDIT RECORD ↗
842 CE–1400 CErange
CANONICAL FORMOld French

embuié

Old French

person in fetters

3 EVIDENCE LINKS

Canonical form chronology encoded in the reviewed lexical graph.

AUDIT RECORD ↗
842 CE–1400 CErange
CANONICAL FORMOld French

embuier

Old French

to fetter

2 EVIDENCE LINKS

Canonical form chronology encoded in the reviewed lexical graph.

AUDIT RECORD ↗
842 CE–1400 CErange
CANONICAL FORMOld French

buie

Old French

fetter; shackle

2 EVIDENCE LINKS

Canonical form chronology encoded in the reviewed lexical graph.

AUDIT RECORD ↗
842 CE–1400 CErange
CANONICAL FORMOld French

figure

Old French

shape; form; likeness

1 EVIDENCE LINK

Canonical form chronology encoded in the reviewed lexical graph.

AUDIT RECORD ↗
842 CE–1400 CErange
CANONICAL FORMOld French

-logie

Old French

learned noun-forming element transmitted into Middle English

2 EVIDENCE LINKS

Canonical form chronology encoded in the reviewed lexical graph.

AUDIT RECORD ↗
850 CE–899 CErange
ROUTE STAGECorvey catalog attribution

hatōn

Cgm 25, second half of the ninth century

The MDZ catalog identifies Corvey and dates the Munich manuscript to the second half of the ninth century. The point represents the catalog attribution, not the birthplace of the lexeme.

1 EVIDENCE LINK

A cataloged manuscript-production interval represented by a bounded approximate point.

AUDIT RECORD ↗
850 CE–899 CErange
ROUTE STAGECorvey catalog attribution

heti

Cgm 25, second half of the ninth century

The directly inspected Munich witness visibly preserves heti at Heliand 1322. The point represents the catalog attribution, not the birthplace of the lexeme.

1 EVIDENCE LINK

A cataloged manuscript-production interval represented by a bounded approximate point.

AUDIT RECORD ↗
850 CE–899 CErange
ROUTE STAGECorvey catalog attribution

hōti

Cgm 25, second half of the ninth century

The Munich witness directly preserves hotie and hotean. The point represents a catalog attribution, not the adjective's birthplace.

3 EVIDENCE LINKS

A bounded manuscript-production interval represented by an approximate catalog point.

AUDIT RECORD ↗
850 CE–899 CErange
CANONICAL FORMOld Saxon

hatan

Munich Heliand manuscript, second half of the ninth century

to hate in the quoted enemy command; wider paradigm also glossed pursue

12 EVIDENCE LINKS

Canonical form chronology encoded in the reviewed lexical graph.

AUDIT RECORD ↗
850 CE–999 CErange
ROUTE STAGELater Heliand manuscript transmission

heti

Cotton C and Vatican V readings

Köbler reports the same Heliand 1322 spelling in C and V, but neither token was directly inspected and no single shared production point is invented.

2 EVIDENCE LINKS

A conservative manuscript-transmission band; individual object dates and places are not collapsed.

AUDIT RECORD ↗
850 CE–999 CErange
ROUTE STAGEOld Saxon Genesis and Saxon Confession records

heti

dative heti and genitive hetias

The Genesis object remains unresolved here; the Academy source key dates the Saxon Confession to the tenth century. The two records are not treated as one manuscript event.

2 EVIDENCE LINKS

A bounded documentary horizon with unequal object-level certainty.

AUDIT RECORD ↗
900 CE →open
CANONICAL FORMPresent-Day English

mussel

before the 12th century–today

a marine or freshwater bivalve mollusk

4 EVIDENCE LINKS

Canonical form chronology encoded in the reviewed lexical graph.

AUDIT RECORD ↗
900 CE →open
CANONICAL FORMPresent-Day English

mouse

before the 12th century–today

a small rodent; later many transferred senses

3 EVIDENCE LINKS

Canonical form chronology encoded in the reviewed lexical graph.

AUDIT RECORD ↗
900 CE–999 CEcentury
ROUTE STAGEOld High German textual world

Liebe

10th-century liubî records

The EWA article reports liubî and lioba in glosses and named Old High German sources from the tenth century.

1 EVIDENCE LINK

The century belongs to the reported Old High German textual horizon, not a claim about first spoken use.

AUDIT RECORD ↗
900 CE–1050 CErange
ROUTE STAGEOld High German lexical boundary

fīēn

no securely identified continuation after the reviewed pocket

The reviewed source does not establish one exact extinction event, last speaker, or later High German descendant of this verb.

1 EVIDENCE LINK

An evidence gap after the bounded record, not a dated death certificate for the verb.

AUDIT RECORD ↗
900 CE–1200 CErange
ROUTE STAGEMedieval Irish textual and glossary tradition

cais

cais and caise

eDIL groups citations capable of love or hate readings under its first cais headword. Individual cited objects and composition dates were not normalized or directly inspected.

2 EVIDENCE LINKS

A conventional Middle Irish language-stage range; it is not an earliest-use claim for the headword or either sense.

AUDIT RECORD ↗
900 CE–1300 CErange
ROUTE STAGEOld Norse poetic transmission

fjá

Hýmiskviða 22: goð fjá

The active verb occurs in a normalized Eddic verse about the world-serpent that hates the gods; no manuscript coordinate is manufactured.

2 EVIDENCE LINKS

A broad poetic-transmission horizon because no exact composition date or manuscript object was verified here.

AUDIT RECORD ↗
900 CE–1300 CErange
ROUTE STAGEOld Norse poetic transmission

fjá

Lokasenna 35: mangi fíár

The finite form appears in a normalized verse meaning that no one hates the son; the record is not converted into a false first-use date.

2 EVIDENCE LINKS

A broad poetic-transmission horizon rather than a point date.

AUDIT RECORD ↗
900 CE–1300 CErange
ROUTE STAGEOld Norse poetic transmission

fjá

Skírnismál 33: Freyr fiásk

The reflexive form appears in a normalized curse stanza; active and reflexive grammar remain visible without inventing separate origins.

2 EVIDENCE LINKS

A broad poetic-transmission horizon rather than a point date.

AUDIT RECORD ↗
900 CE–1300 CErange
CANONICAL FORMOld Norse

fjá

Old Norse poetic record; exact composition dates not fixed here

to hate; in the reflexive, to hate someone

5 EVIDENCE LINKS

Canonical form chronology encoded in the reviewed lexical graph.

AUDIT RECORD ↗
02 / WHAT STAYS OUT

UNBOUNDED IS
A REAL RESULT.

Stages without source-backed numeric bounds stay in their complete Journey Atlas route, carry an explicit temporal note, and remain absent here until the evidence supports normalization. The missing point is visible work—not permission to guess.

INSPECT ALL JOURNEYS ↗EXPORT TIMELINE EVENTS ↗