820 canonical forms + 578 route stages.
THE TIMELINE ATLAS
JOURNEY ATLAS ↗FORM / ROUTE / BOUND
1398 REVIEWED EVENTSLANGUAGE
IN TIME.
One cross-word chronology for every defensibly bounded form and journey stage—without converting a vague historical label into a fake year.
A reviewed graph bound, not a claim of an earliest human word.
Only stages with directly cited numeric bounds enter this atlas.
Labels remain visible in Journey Atlas, but not parsed into false years.
FILTER THE CHRONOLOGY
WHEN DID THE EVIDENCE LAND?
TWO CLOCKS.
NO FALSE PRECISION.
FORM CHRONOLOGY dates a canonical linguistic form or reconstruction in the lexical graph.
ROUTE CHRONOLOGY dates a geographic or transmission stage in a word’s journey.
They can share an era band, but they are never silently treated as the same kind of claim.
CROSS-WORD CHRONOLOGY / EARLIEST BOUND FIRST
THE EVIDENCE IN TIME
hōti
Old Saxon Heliand record
hostile, inimical, or enraged
-logy
Old French -logie
The Latin learned element continues in Old French before reaching Middle English.
The bounds identify the conventional Old French stage rather than one dated borrowing event.
AUDIT RECORD ↗-al
Old French period
adjective-forming suffix
-iser / -izer
Old French period
verb-forming suffix
regal
Old French
royal, kingly
reiame
Old French
kingdom, government
reial
Old French
royal
riche
Old French
rich, wealthy
femele
Old French
female
humain
Old French
human
embuié
Old French
person in fetters
embuier
Old French
to fetter
buie
Old French
fetter; shackle
figure
Old French
shape; form; likeness
-logie
Old French
learned noun-forming element transmitted into Middle English
hatōn
Cgm 25, second half of the ninth century
The MDZ catalog identifies Corvey and dates the Munich manuscript to the second half of the ninth century. The point represents the catalog attribution, not the birthplace of the lexeme.
A cataloged manuscript-production interval represented by a bounded approximate point.
AUDIT RECORD ↗heti
Cgm 25, second half of the ninth century
The directly inspected Munich witness visibly preserves heti at Heliand 1322. The point represents the catalog attribution, not the birthplace of the lexeme.
A cataloged manuscript-production interval represented by a bounded approximate point.
AUDIT RECORD ↗hōti
Cgm 25, second half of the ninth century
The Munich witness directly preserves hotie and hotean. The point represents a catalog attribution, not the adjective's birthplace.
A bounded manuscript-production interval represented by an approximate catalog point.
AUDIT RECORD ↗hatan
Munich Heliand manuscript, second half of the ninth century
to hate in the quoted enemy command; wider paradigm also glossed pursue
heti
Cotton C and Vatican V readings
Köbler reports the same Heliand 1322 spelling in C and V, but neither token was directly inspected and no single shared production point is invented.
A conservative manuscript-transmission band; individual object dates and places are not collapsed.
AUDIT RECORD ↗heti
dative heti and genitive hetias
The Genesis object remains unresolved here; the Academy source key dates the Saxon Confession to the tenth century. The two records are not treated as one manuscript event.
mussel
before the 12th century–today
a marine or freshwater bivalve mollusk
mouse
before the 12th century–today
a small rodent; later many transferred senses
Liebe
10th-century liubî records
The EWA article reports liubî and lioba in glosses and named Old High German sources from the tenth century.
The century belongs to the reported Old High German textual horizon, not a claim about first spoken use.
AUDIT RECORD ↗fīēn
no securely identified continuation after the reviewed pocket
The reviewed source does not establish one exact extinction event, last speaker, or later High German descendant of this verb.
An evidence gap after the bounded record, not a dated death certificate for the verb.
AUDIT RECORD ↗cais
cais and caise
eDIL groups citations capable of love or hate readings under its first cais headword. Individual cited objects and composition dates were not normalized or directly inspected.
A conventional Middle Irish language-stage range; it is not an earliest-use claim for the headword or either sense.
AUDIT RECORD ↗fjá
Hýmiskviða 22: goð fjá
The active verb occurs in a normalized Eddic verse about the world-serpent that hates the gods; no manuscript coordinate is manufactured.
A broad poetic-transmission horizon because no exact composition date or manuscript object was verified here.
AUDIT RECORD ↗fjá
Lokasenna 35: mangi fíár
The finite form appears in a normalized verse meaning that no one hates the son; the record is not converted into a false first-use date.
fjá
Skírnismál 33: Freyr fiásk
The reflexive form appears in a normalized curse stanza; active and reflexive grammar remain visible without inventing separate origins.
fjá
Old Norse poetic record; exact composition dates not fixed here
to hate; in the reflexive, to hate someone
UNBOUNDED IS
A REAL RESULT.
Stages without source-backed numeric bounds stay in their complete Journey Atlas route, carry an explicit temporal note, and remain absent here until the evidence supports normalization. The missing point is visible work—not permission to guess.