*SET-U

GRAPH-WIDE SEARCH

MEASURE THE GRAPH ↗

NOT JUST A DICTIONARY LOOKUP

6 EVIDENCE COLLECTIONS

SEARCH
THE GRAPH.

Find a modern word—or search sideways through reconstructed roots, historical forms, meanings, languages, scholars, sources, claims, disputes, and witnesses.

WIKTIONARY VIA KAIKKI / WIKTEXTRACT

Imported dictionary evidence

SOURCE-IMPORTED · UNREVIEWED

These are source reports, not reviewed *SET-U ancestry. A list of templates or numbered etymologies is not an ancestor chain. Scholarly disagreements remain in the original source text.

35,981 English word records · 45,491 etymology sections in this online subset

PARTIAL ENGLISH COVERAGE · FULL CORPUS REMAINS LOCAL

No exact match for “Comp” in this partial English subset. That does not mean the full research corpus—or linguistic scholarship—has no record. Check the original dictionary entry ↗

From Wiktionary contributors; extracted by Tatu Ylonen / Wiktextract / Kaikki.org. Extraction source · CC-BY-SA-4.0. Selected source text is reformatted for display; language and section identity are retained.

Source dump: 2026-10-01 · Extraction: 2026-10-30. These dates identify a dump snapshot, not an individual page revision.

Snapshot checksums and coverage
SOURCE SHA-256
5ff2c072f8099f2d2ce484bd6957bf179f046d2ad37bc36555edf8bb84cb5291
CORPUS SHA-256
c4c2a77325141846709230e11c2959332acd630d53e52905b72d36211251b081
IMPORT RUN
73216b9a9b78ed3830994bf853103716f5a4dc57099e371e9f8fdc468facca26
SUBSET SELECTION
English-only: shortest normalized query first, then binary lexical order; complete word-language and case-variant groups only. This is a bounded online subset, not the full acquired corpus.

INDEPENDENT SOURCE LIBRARY

More sources for this spelling

These are spelling matches, not a claim of identical senses or agreement. Historical accounts retain their own editions and limits; none is automatically promoted into reviewed ancestry.

Mayhew–Skeat (1888)

1888; pinned HTML transcription updated October 28, 2024
Browse the independently attributed sources →
WIKTIONARY / SOURCE LOOKUPEXTERNAL · COMMUNITY EDITED

Comp

No extractable etymology was found for this exact spelling. Open the original dictionary entry ↗

Read the complete entry and references ↗ · Contribute a cited dossier

62REVIEWED RESULTS
12WORD DOSSIERS
12HISTORICAL NODES
9SOURCES
24CLAIMS
5WITNESSES
01

MODERN ENTRY POINTS

WORD DOSSIERS

12
onomastic compound elementcontrarian claim

-rīx

An attested Gaulish second member meaning “king” or “prince,” visible in compound personal names such as Dumnorix and Vercingetorix and inherited from Proto-Celtic *rīx-s.

OPEN THE FULL LINEAGE ↗
German masculine noundossier summary

Feind

The modern German noun for a personal, political, military, or ideological enemy or opponent. Duden derives it through Middle High German vīnt or vīant and Old High German fīand, literally the hating one; DWDS dates Old High German fīant and fījant to the eighth century and identifies the Germanic ancestor as a petrified substantivized present participle. Grimm’s dictionary independently compares Gothic fijands, Old English fēond, English fiend, Dutch vijand, and Nordic forms, while warning that its own still-deeper foam hypothesis required confirmation. The reviewed route therefore follows the inherited enemy noun to reconstructed *fi(j)and- and *fi(j)ēn-, then treats *peh₁- as proposed and stops.

OPEN THE FULL LINEAGE ↗
German masculine noundossier summary

Freund

German Freund continues Middle High German vriunt and Old High German friunt. DWDS/Pfeifer, Duden, and Grimm independently analyze the inherited Germanic formation as a substantivized present participle of the verb represented by Gothic frijōn and Old English frēogan: historically a loving or favorably disposed one. The record is semantically wider than a modern close companion: the historical dictionaries also document neighbor, relative, lover, ally, supporter, patron, address, and euphemistic uses. The graph joins the High German line to the same reviewed *frijōnd- and *frī- nodes as English friend, keeps *prī- proposed, and stops.

OPEN THE FULL LINEAGE ↗
German masculine nouncontrarian claim

Hass

The modern German noun for intense aversion, rejection, or hostility toward a person, group, or institution. Duden traces Middle and Old High German haʒ to suffering, sorrow, and resentment and records the 1996 spelling change from Haß to Hass. DWDS/Pfeifer reports the Old High German noun from the eighth century and places it in the Germanic family of Old Saxon heti, Old English hete, Old Norse hatr, Gothic hatis, and related forms. Grimm’s DWB preserves a more complicated semantic record: hostile pursuit or action, anger expressed in deeds, ordinary hostile disposition, and even measured rivalry during friendly competition. The reviewed route reuses *hatiz- and the qualified *ḱh₂d-es- / *ḱeh₂d- comparison, then stops.

OPEN THE FULL LINEAGE ↗
nouncontrarian claim

algebra

A mathematical discipline whose English name travels through Medieval Latin from Arabic al-jabr, restoration or completion.

OPEN THE FULL LINEAGE ↗
nounhistorical form

algorism

The older English word for calculation with Hindu-Arabic numerals, transmitted through French and Medieval Latin from the name al-Khwārizmī.

OPEN THE FULL LINEAGE ↗
nounhistorical form

algorithm

A finite or stepwise procedure, descended through medieval arithmetic vocabulary from the Latinized name of al-Khwārizmī.

OPEN THE FULL LINEAGE ↗
noun · adjectivehistorical form

arithmetic

The art or practice of counting and calculation; transmitted from Greek arithmos “number” through Latin and French.

OPEN THE FULL LINEAGE ↗
nouncontrarian claim

bride

A woman about to be or recently married; inherited from Old English brȳd and directly preserved inside bridegroom.

OPEN THE FULL LINEAGE ↗
Middle Irish noundossier summary

cais

eDIL separates two Irish headwords written cais. The first, also recorded as caise, is explicitly explained both as love and as hate; its cited passages and glossary equations range from searc and grádh "love" to miscais and mioscais "hatred", with context deciding individual readings. One Éigse line is tentatively translated so that the same visible form occurs on both sides: "my love ... is met by hatred(?)". The question mark matters. The second eDIL headword cais means "eye" and is excluded from this semantic lineage. These records establish a remarkable lexicographic opposition, not one timeless essence, a chronology from love to hate, or proof that every occurrence belongs to one historically indivisible sense. John T. Koch compares the noun with Proto-Celtic *katsi- < *kad-t/si- and a wider *kad- family, but that ancestry and its proposed Germanic comparison remain open. eDIL itself generally supplies etymologies only selectively. No manuscript pixels were directly inspected, no earliest-use or historical-frequency claim is made, and no exact pronunciation is invented.

OPEN THE FULL LINEAGE ↗
verbhistorical form

calculate

To determine mathematically or estimate, borrowed from a Latin family built around counting with pebbles.

OPEN THE FULL LINEAGE ↗
nouncontrarian claim

calculator

A person or device that calculates, inherited from a medieval human-reckoner word and the Latin counting-pebble family.

OPEN THE FULL LINEAGE ↗
02

ATTESTED / RECONSTRUCTED / BOUNDARY

HISTORICAL FORMS

12
*
Proto-Indo-European / Indo-European

*kad-

a proposed base used in a wider Celtic, Germanic, Italic, Iranian, and Greek comparison

DATE
proposed Proto-Indo-European base
MATCH
gloss
DOSSIERS
1
*
Proto-Celtic / Indo-European

*katsi-

a proposed Celtic formation compared with Middle Irish cais and Old Welsh cas

DATE
proposed Proto-Celtic
MATCH
gloss
DOSSIERS
1
*
Proto-Indo-European / Indo-European

*prī-

a proposed Indo-European root compared with the Germanic friend and free family

DATE
proposed Indo-European comparison
MATCH
gloss
DOSSIERS
5
●
Old English / Indo-European

-ræden

condition, state, estimation, rule, or relation to the first compound element

DATE
Old English
MATCH
gloss
DOSSIERS
0
●
Gaulish / Indo-European

-rīx

king or prince as the second member of compound personal names

DATE
first-century BCE onomastic hosts
MATCH
gloss
DOSSIERS
1
●
German / Indo-European

Freund

friend, trusted companion, romantic partner, supporter, patron, ally, or familiar form of address

DATE
New High German and current German
MATCH
gloss
DOSSIERS
1
●
Classical Arabic / Afro-Asiatic

al-jabr

restoration, completion; an operation in equation solving

DATE
9th century
MATCH
gloss
DOSSIERS
1
●
Medieval Latin / Indo-European

algorismus

arithmetic; computation with Hindu-Arabic numerals

DATE
12th–15th centuries
MATCH
gloss
DOSSIERS
2
●
Middle English / Indo-European

arsmetike / arsmetrik

arithmetic or the art of computation

DATE
Middle English, mid-13th–15th century
MATCH
gloss
DOSSIERS
1
●
Present-Day English / Indo-European

calculate

to compute, determine, estimate, or plan

DATE
1542–today
MATCH
gloss
DOSSIERS
1
●
Latin / Indo-European

calculāre

to count, reckon, compute

DATE
Latin antiquity and Late Latin
MATCH
gloss
DOSSIERS
2
●
Medieval Latin / Indo-European

calculātus

counted, reckoned, computed

DATE
Late Latin
MATCH
gloss
DOSSIERS
1
03

WHERE INTERPRETATION IS TESTED

CLAIMS & DISPUTES

24

SCHOLARLY DISPUTES / 12

openprobableposition text

Did -rīx mean exactly “king” in every compound name?

Not necessarily. The king or prince value is secure for the element, but scholarship distinguishes names where it is determinative from analyses in which it is semantically bleached or intensifying. Each host therefore requires its own compositional claim.

openprobableposition text

Is the exact phonetic shape of *fi(j)and- directly known?

No. The form is a comparative reconstruction. Optional j notation, branch vowels, and the relation of written historical variants require analysis rather than direct Proto-Germanic observation.

openproposedposition text

Is the deepest *peh₁- route established?

No. The Germanic verb and lexicalized agent formation are firmer than the proposed Indo-European comparison, whose formal intermediates and semantic unity remain reconstructive.

openprobableposition text

Can the exact Proto-Germanic pronunciation and paradigm be recovered?

Not completely. Comparative forms support the morphology, but no recording or written Proto-Germanic paradigm survives.

openproposedposition text

Does Freund securely descend from exactly *prī-?

The comparison is published on the shared friend-family route but remains proposed and less secure than the Germanic formation.

openprobableposition text

Was the relative sense inherited or independently strengthened in Germanic branches?

The sources establish the sense across German and Nordic evidence but do not recover one complete prehistoric semantic tree.

openproposedposition text

Do Celtic cais and Greek κῆδος prove that love and hate share one root?

No. They belong to a disputed wider comparison. Middle Irish cais carries a striking love-and-hatred field, but that does not make German Liebe an ancestor or cognate of Hass.

openproposedposition text

Is the deepest counting root *h₂rei- or *erei-dhmo- from *re-?

The references use different levels and notations: Merriam-Webster derives the Greek base through *h₂rei-, while Etymonline prints an expanded *erei-dhmo- formation tied to *re-.

openprobableposition text

What securely precedes Old English brȳd?

The sources publish broad Germanic comparanda, including Old High German brūt, but this dossier does not yet have a reviewed source that warrants one reconstructed parent.

openproposedposition text

Is Proto-Celtic *katsi- the secure direct parent of cais?

Koch publishes the comparison, but the reviewed materials do not expose a complete dated Goidelic derivation or independent consensus sufficient to mark the edge established.

openproposedposition text

Does cais securely prove cognacy with the Germanic hate family?

No. The Celtic–Germanic comparison is serious enough to display, but the graph keeps it as a context link rather than a genealogical edge because formal and semantic acceptance remain unsettled.

openprobableposition text

How was historical cais pronounced in each cited period and region?

Not directly recoverable from the reviewed evidence. Written forms and variants do not constitute recorded audio or a complete phonological reconstruction.

CONTRARIAN TRUTHS / 12

RANK 7GRADE Aranked reveal

Nice crossed from ignorance to approval.

Latin nescius “ignorant” became foolish or wanton, then fastidious and precise, and finally pleasant or kind.

RANK 12GRADE Aranked reveal

A Turkish word is not proof of who invented the food.

English yogurt is Turkish yoğurt, probably related to yoğur- “knead”; the origin of fermented milk is a different historical question.

RANK 13GRADE Aranked reveal

Legislation came before legislate.

The noun preserves a Latin law-bearing or law-proposing compound. English legislate was later back-formed from the already existing noun family.

RANK 23GRADE Aranked reveal

The d in kindred is an intruder—and kind is not in the word.

Kindred is kin plus a fossilized native element meaning a condition or state. One branch reaches the birth root; the other reaches a fit-together root. The modern d arrived between n and r after the compound already existed.

RANK 24GRADE Aranked reveal

Hatred is medieval—and its -red means neither red nor “more.”

Middle English assembled hate with a dying native element for a state or condition. The compound is younger than its parts; below the secure Germanic hate family, even the celebrated PIE root remains a qualified and semantically difficult proposal.

RANK 31GRADE Aranked reveal

Gothic’s two hate verbs trade places across two passages.

The complete surviving hatan corpus contains only hatandane in Luke 1:71 and hatandans in Luke 6:27. In Luke 1, fijandam supplies enemies while hatandane supplies those hating; in Luke 6, hatandans supplies enemies while fijandam supplies those hating. Both Codex Argenteus pages are directly inspected. The lexical swap—and the class-III versus class-I dispute—cannot be represented by one timeless translation arrow.

RANK 42GRADE Aranked reveal

The ordinary Old Norse enemy outlived the finite hate verb behind it.

ONP classifies fjá as poetic and exposes no prose citations. Cleasby, Fritzner, and Lexicon Poeticum converge on three Eddic contexts, while normalized texts preserve active fjá, finite fíár, and reflexive fiásk. Cleasby then points to fjándi as the participial relative that remained across Germanic. ONP gives that separate enemy noun 222 prose citations and a large semantic range. The two corpus totals are not directly frequency-comparable, and neither proves an exact extinction event; together they reveal the asymmetry between a tiny finite-verb record and the prolific lexicalized enemy branch.

RANK 45GRADE Aranked reveal

One Gothic anger verb survives in one question—and not in its dictionary form.

Project Wulfila’s complete current inventory contains one hatizōn token: hatizoþ in John 7:23, “are you angry at me?” Codex Argenteus folio 94v directly preserves the inflection. The manuscript never writes the normalized infinitive or its editorial macron. Grammar then reveals another layer: hatizōn is a class-II verb built from the consonantal stem hatiz- of hatis “hatred” or “wrath.” One English gloss therefore hides a noun-to-verb formation, one surviving grammatical person, and a sharp boundary between pixels and reconstruction.

RANK 46GRADE Aranked reveal

Old High German hazzōn is a paradigm fault line, not proof that hate originally meant pursue.

The clean dictionary headword conceals paired ēn and ōn forms: Starling reports hazzēn in the eighth century and hazzōn in the ninth, Duden prints haʒʒēn and haʒʒōn, and the UT reflex index also records hazēn and hazōn. Corpus-wide research confirms that Old High German ēn verbs can show ōn double forms. DWB reports aemulari and insequi alignments that support emulation, following, or hostile pursuit—but Pokorny’s comparative warning is exact: Germanic evidence does not prove that pursue was the root’s basic meaning. The normalized form, the source-reported tokens, the paradigm analysis, and the prehistoric semantic claim are four different evidence layers.

RANK 47GRADE Aranked reveal

The Old Dutch enemy noun outlived the hate verb that created it.

ONW counts twenty-six fīunt occurrences across six attested case-number cells, yet classifies the noun as synchronically unsegmented and says the corresponding hate verb is no longer known in Dutch. Comparative evidence reconstructs the noun as an old present-participial formation: the hating one. The grammar therefore preserves a fossil in nominative, genitive, dative, and accusative records after Dutch lost the living verb that once made the formation transparent. Six cells are evidence, not a complete paradigm; the early Psalms records survive in later copies; and the lone Devil gloss is disputed.

RANK 51GRADE Aranked reveal

Care, grief, funerals, and in-laws occupy one Greek noun—but hate does not secretly mean care.

LSJ's κῆδος entry moves through care and concern, anxiety and grief, troubles, mourning and funeral rites, an object of care, and connection by marriage. Homeric κήδεʼ can be many-troubled woes; Aeschylus can make Helen an object of care while playing on marriage affinity. Comparative sources then place the noun beside Celtic and Germanic hatred words under *ḱh₂d-es- and *ḱeh₂d-. The reveal is not a mystical reversal in which hate “really” means care. Merriam-Webster calls the semantic relations far from transparent, Liberman challenges the wider family's unity, and the Greek evidence itself resists a single linear story.

04

BOOKS / DICTIONARIES / ARTICLES / DATABASES

SOURCES

9
05

FIRST USES & HISTORICAL OBJECTS

ATTESTATION WITNESSES

5
06

SEARCH IS DISCOVERY, NOT PROOF

EVERY RESULT OPENS A PERMANENT EVIDENCE RECORD.

Matching text only locates a record. It does not raise confidence, settle a dispute, establish cognacy, or turn a source report into direct inspection. Follow the result into its citations and editorial limits.