*SET-U

CANONICAL LANGUAGE GRAPH

TRACE A WORD ↗
NODE / 1265reconstructedProto-Indo-European

*kad-

TRANSLITERATION *kad-

a proposed base used in a wider Celtic, Germanic, Italic, Iranian, and Greek comparison

DATE
proposed Proto-Indo-European base
SENSE
proposed deep love hatred base
FAMILY
Indo-European
CANONICAL KEY
node:6:kad:reconstructed:sense:proposed-deep-love-hatred-base

The wider comparison is published, but its members do not yield one transparent semantic history. Love, hate, care, grief, and related fields are not collapsed into one prehistoric essence.

*

This form is reconstructed by comparison. It is not directly attested in this exact written form.

01

ANCESTRAL EDGES

ROOT OF THIS ROOT

1
*
THE TRAIL ENDS HERE.

No securely reviewed ancestor extends beyond this node. 1 evidence path stops at this boundary.

INSPECT 1 CITED BOUNDARY CLAIM
GO DEEPERknowledge boundaryboundary
Beyond secure reconstruction · beyond the proposed *kad- comparison · cais middle irish deep boundary

UNKNOWN

No securely accepted earlier ancestor or uniquely recoverable original meaning is known.

SOUND
No older form is promoted beyond the proposed *kad- comparison.
MEANING
The graph stops before the attested love and hate readings are reverse-engineered into a universal prehistoric emotion or action.
SCHOLAR
SET-U editorial boundary · John T. Koch · Anatoly Liberman
CONFIDENCE
boundary — The displayed route is a published proposal, not a secure endpoint shared by all reviewed scholarship.
02

DIRECT DESCENDANT EDGES

THE NEXT HISTORICAL STEP

1
DESCENDANTderivationproposed
Proto-Indo-European · proposed pre-Celtic or Indo-European formation · proposed suffixal formation

*kad-t/si-

a proposed formation underlying Proto-Celtic *katsi-

SOUND
The proposed *kad-t/si- formation is analyzed from the base *kad- with suffixal material.
MEANING
The wider comparison links semantically difficult fields including love, hatred, care, grief, and enmity; the graph preserves the comparison without declaring a single original meaning.
CHRONOLOGY
Two reconstructed analytical levels rather than independently dated lexical tokens.
SCHOLAR
John T. Koch · Anatoly Liberman
CONFIDENCE
proposed — The formal proposal is published, while the cross-branch semantic unity is disputed.
03

TRANSITIVE DESCENDANT CLOSURE

EVERY REVIEWED BRANCH FROM HERE

3

This is the complete downstream closure currently supported by the canonical graph. Every displayed step is a real reviewed edge with its own sound claim, meaning claim, scholar, confidence, and citations.

UNIQUE DESCENDANT NODES
3
REVIEWED EDGES
3
DEEPEST PATH
3
MODERN DOSSIERS REACHED
1
HISTORICAL STEP 011 EDGE
STEP 01derivationproposed
SOUND
The proposed *kad-t/si- formation is analyzed from the base *kad- with suffixal material.
MEANING
The wider comparison links semantically difficult fields including love, hatred, care, grief, and enmity; the graph preserves the comparison without declaring a single original meaning.
John T. Koch · Anatoly Liberman2 CITATIONSEDGE 1235 ↗
HISTORICAL STEP 021 EDGE
STEP 02derivationproposed
SOUND
Koch analyzes *katsi- from *kad-t/si-. The displayed consonant cluster and affricate outcome follow that published reconstruction rather than an independently observed sound record.
MEANING
A proposed suffixal formation is assigned to the Celtic love and hatred field; no single direction of semantic development is recovered.
John T. Koch1 CITATIONEDGE 1234 ↗
HISTORICAL STEP 031 EDGE
STEP 03proposed inheritanceproposed
SOUND
Koch compares Middle Irish cais with Proto-Celtic *katsi-. The reviewed evidence does not publish a complete, dated chain of Goidelic sound changes, so no missing intermediate forms are invented.
MEANING
The attested Irish entry carries both love and hate readings. The reconstruction does not identify which reading is older or prove that the opposition was already present in Proto-Celtic.
John T. Koch · Royal Irish Academy eDIL editors3 CITATIONSEDGE 1233 ↗

“Every” means every descendant in the reviewed SET-U graph. It does not convert missing scholarship or missing ingestion into a claim of historical completeness. The coverage ledger remains the honest denominator.

04

RECORDED EVIDENCE

ATTESTATIONS / FIRST KNOWN USE

0
NO RECORDED WITNESS ATTACHED.

That is expected for a reconstructed form: the node is inferred from comparison, not quoted from a surviving occurrence.

05

EDITORIAL REUSE

WORD DOSSIERS USING THIS NODE

1