Canonical edges, each carrying form and meaning history.
THE CHANGE ATLAS
WORD FAMILIES ↗EVERY REVIEWED EDGE / TWO HISTORIES EACH
FORM → MEANING → EVIDENCEHOW WORDS MOVE.
HOW MEANINGS MUTATE.
A global atlas of every reviewed transformation in the graph—from lost vowels and borrowed spellings to meanings narrowed, inverted, elevated, and remade.
EVERY TRANSFORMATION
IS A CLAIM.
Every edge names the linked forms, relationship, sound history, semantic history, scholar, confidence, chronology when known, and the sources that warrant it. Search the language of change without flattening it.
No reviewed edge is allowed to omit what changed in form.
No reviewed edge is allowed to omit what changed in meaning.
515 distinct sources support the edge ledger.
Named analyses remain attached instead of becoming anonymous fact.
Borrowing, inheritance, derivation, uncertainty, and more stay distinct.
SEARCH THE TRANSFORMATIONS
FOLLOW CHANGE ITSELF.
The atlas searches the exact reviewed prose and authoritative edge labels. It does not manufacture universal “sound laws” or semantic categories by guessing from descriptions.
ALL TRANSFORMATIONS
1025 EVIDENCE-BACKED CHANGES
Modern dime preserves the older spelling while English pronunciation developed to /daɪm/.
A general tenth-part or tithe word is applied specifically to a coin worth one tenth of a dollar.
CHRONOLOGYMiddle English ancestry; United States coin sense reported from 1786.
CONFIDENCE NOTEMerriam-Webster supplies both the older tenth-part meaning and the 1786 coin use.
Middle English dime adapts Anglo-French disme or dime, including loss of the written consonant in the simplified form.
The meaning remains a tenth part or tithe.
CHRONOLOGYAnglo-French to Middle English.
CONFIDENCE NOTEThe borrowing route is explicit in the source.
Anglo-French disme and dime continue Latin decima through regular Romance reduction and spelling change.
The tenth-part and tithe meaning remains central.
CHRONOLOGYLatin to Anglo-French.
CONFIDENCE NOTEThe source directly traces the French forms to Latin decima.
Latin decima is the feminine form of decimus.
The ordinal adjective “tenth” is substantivized as a tenth part or tithe.
CHRONOLOGYLatin derivation.
CONFIDENCE NOTEMerriam-Webster explicitly identifies decima as feminine of decimus.
Modern hostel continues the Middle English form, including its revived use after a period of reduced currency.
A general inn or lodging word specializes toward inexpensive, communal, youth, and institutional accommodation.
CHRONOLOGYMedieval English origin with later revival and specialization.
CONFIDENCE NOTEThe dictionary and family history support the medieval word and modern lodging senses.
Middle English hostel borrows Anglo-French ostel or hostel with close preservation of the form.
The lodging meaning remains stable.
CHRONOLOGYAnglo-French to Middle English.
CONFIDENCE NOTEThe borrowing is directly stated.
Anglo-French ostel or hostel continues Latin hospitāle with loss and reduction around the initial consonant cluster.
Guest accommodation remains the core meaning.
CHRONOLOGYLatin to Gallo-Romance and Anglo-French.
CONFIDENCE NOTEThe source directly gives Latin hospitāle as the predecessor.
English hospice adapts French hospice with English pronunciation.
A religious or charitable lodging develops toward institutional palliative care and support.
CHRONOLOGYMiddle French to English.
CONFIDENCE NOTEThe French borrowing, 1818 first use, and older lodging sense are directly reported.
Middle French hospise or hospice adapts Medieval Latin hospitium, including the ending that becomes French -ce.
Hospitality, lodging, and shelter remain central.
CHRONOLOGYMedieval Latin to Middle French.
CONFIDENCE NOTEThe source explicitly describes the Medieval Latin borrowing and French ending.
Medieval Latin hospitium is built on the hospit- stem of hospes with a denominal suffix.
The host-or-guest role becomes accommodation, hospitality, or shelter.
CHRONOLOGYLatin and Medieval Latin derivation.
CONFIDENCE NOTEThe derivation is explicit in the hospice entry.
Modern lesson continues the Middle English form with spelling stabilization.
A reading or assigned text expands into instruction and then something learned from experience.
CHRONOLOGYMiddle English to modern English.
CONFIDENCE NOTEThe historical and current senses are documented in the entry.
Middle English lesson or lessoun adapts Anglo-French leçon.
The reading and instructional senses remain connected.
CHRONOLOGYAnglo-French to Middle English.
CONFIDENCE NOTEThe Anglo-French borrowing is directly reported.
Anglo-French leçon continues Late Latin lectiō through regular Romance sound and spelling development.
An act or selection of reading remains the source of the lesson sense.
CHRONOLOGYLate Latin to Anglo-French.
CONFIDENCE NOTEThe source gives Late Latin lection-, lectio as the French source.
Latin lectiō is formed from the reading stem associated with legere.
The act of gathering or selecting develops into reading, then a reading passage.
CHRONOLOGYLatin derivation.
CONFIDENCE NOTEThe derivation from Latin legere “to read” is explicit.
English select borrows Latin selectus with minor English phonological adaptation.
The Latin “chosen apart” sense becomes English adjectival and verbal selection.
CHRONOLOGYEnglish adjective reported from 1565 and verb from 1566.
CONFIDENCE NOTEThe source explicitly gives Latin selectus as the English source.
Latin selectus is the past participle of seligere.
The action “choose apart” becomes the result “chosen.”
CHRONOLOGYLatin morphology.
CONFIDENCE NOTEThe inflectional relation is explicit in the entry.
Latin seligere combines se- “apart” with legere “gather, select.”
Gathering becomes discriminating choice by adding the apart element.
CHRONOLOGYLatin derivation.
CONFIDENCE NOTEThe source explicitly decomposes se- plus legere.
Ancient long /yː/ develops through Greek iotacism to Modern Greek /i/, while polytonic μῦς is written monotonic μυς.
The anatomical muscle sense becomes the ordinary modern center; the mouse sense survives as learned vocabulary while everyday Greek normally uses another rodent word.
CHRONOLOGYAncient Greek to Modern Greek.
CONFIDENCE NOTEBoth the modern anatomical entry and its Ancient Greek source are directly documented.
Late Latin nescientia is adapted into English nescience with loss of the Latin ending and English stress and consonant development.
The abstract meaning remains lack of knowledge or awareness.
CHRONOLOGYLate Latin to English by 1612.
CONFIDENCE NOTEThe borrowing path and 1612 English record are directly reported.
Late Latin nescientia is built on the present-participial stem nescient- of nesciens.
A not-knowing person or state supplies the abstract noun for ignorance.
CHRONOLOGYLate Latin derivation.
CONFIDENCE NOTEThe morphological sequence is explicit in the etymology.
Latin nesciens is the present participle of nescīre.
The activity or state of not knowing is expressed as “not knowing.”
CHRONOLOGYLatin derivation.
CONFIDENCE NOTEThe participial relationship is explicit in the etymology.
Middle High German liebe continues into modern German Liebe with capitalization of the noun and standardization of spelling and pronunciation.
The inherited abstract noun remains centered on affection while broadening across personal, religious, and object-directed uses.
CHRONOLOGYMiddle High German to present-day German.
CONFIDENCE NOTEThe immediate Middle High German stage is explicit in the modern dictionary.
Old High German liubī develops into Middle High German liebe through regular High German vowel and ending development.
Love, favor, pleasure, and affection remain overlapping parts of the semantic field.
CHRONOLOGYOld High German to Middle High German.
CONFIDENCE NOTEBoth historical stages and their continuity are directly reported.
Middle Dutch lief continues into modern Dutch lief with stable spelling and later standardization of pronunciation and inflection.
Dear, beloved, pleasant, and kind remain within the inherited adjective’s semantic range.
CHRONOLOGYMiddle Dutch to present-day Dutch.
CONFIDENCE NOTEModern grammar and the historical form are directly documented.
READ THE EDGE, NOT JUST THE WORD
TWO HISTORIES TRAVEL TOGETHER.
Pronunciation, spelling, morphology, loss, insertion, adaptation, and regular historical development.
Narrowing, broadening, metaphor, social reanalysis, technical specialization, and meaning retained.
Attested forms, reconstructed forms marked by *, and explicit knowledge boundaries never share one certainty label.
Scholar, confidence, chronology, source stance, locator, and evidence note remain attached to the atomic edge.