*SET-U

GRAPH-WIDE SEARCH

MEASURE THE GRAPH ↗

NOT JUST A DICTIONARY LOOKUP

6 EVIDENCE COLLECTIONS

SEARCH
THE GRAPH.

Find a modern word—or search sideways through reconstructed roots, historical forms, meanings, languages, scholars, sources, claims, disputes, and witnesses.

WIKTIONARY VIA KAIKKI / WIKTEXTRACT

Imported dictionary evidence

SOURCE-IMPORTED · UNREVIEWED

These are source reports, not reviewed *SET-U ancestry. A list of templates or numbered etymologies is not an ancestor chain. Scholarly disagreements remain in the original source text.

35,981 English word records · 45,491 etymology sections in this online subset

PARTIAL ENGLISH COVERAGE · FULL CORPUS REMAINS LOCAL

4 source sections across 1 headword matching “Fin”. These are separate from the reviewed results below.

Open the permanent entry for fin →
finEnglish (en) · Etymology 1Source text

From Middle English fin, from Old English finn, from Proto-Germanic *finnō, *finǭ (“dorsal fin”) (compare Dutch vin, German Finne, Swedish finne, fena), from Proto-Indo-European *(s)pīn- (“backbone, dorsal fin”) (compare Old Irish ind (“end, point”), Latin pinna (“feather, wing, fin”), Tocharian A spin (“hook”).

Original Wiktionary entry and references ↗
finEnglish (en) · Etymology 2Source text

From Yiddish פֿינף (finf, “five”). Doublet of cinque, finnuf, five, pimp (“five”), ponzu, punch (“beverage”), and sengi (“currency”).

Original Wiktionary entry and references ↗
finEnglish (en) · Etymology 3Source text

From French fin (“end”). Doublet of fine and finis.

Original Wiktionary entry and references ↗
finEnglish (en) · Etymology 4Source text

From Wiktionary contributors; extracted by Tatu Ylonen / Wiktextract / Kaikki.org. Extraction source · CC-BY-SA-4.0. Selected source text is reformatted for display; language and section identity are retained.

Source dump: 2026-10-01 · Extraction: 2026-10-30. These dates identify a dump snapshot, not an individual page revision.

Snapshot checksums and coverage
SOURCE SHA-256
5ff2c072f8099f2d2ce484bd6957bf179f046d2ad37bc36555edf8bb84cb5291
CORPUS SHA-256
c4c2a77325141846709230e11c2959332acd630d53e52905b72d36211251b081
IMPORT RUN
73216b9a9b78ed3830994bf853103716f5a4dc57099e371e9f8fdc468facca26
SUBSET SELECTION
English-only: shortest normalized query first, then binary lexical order; complete word-language and case-variant groups only. This is a bounded online subset, not the full acquired corpus.

INDEPENDENT SOURCE LIBRARY

More sources for this spelling

These are spelling matches, not a claim of identical senses or agreement. Historical accounts retain their own editions and limits; none is automatically promoted into reviewed ancestry.

Browse the independently attributed sources →
67REVIEWED RESULTS
12WORD DOSSIERS
7HISTORICAL NODES
12SOURCES
24CLAIMS
12WITNESSES
01

MODERN ENTRY POINTS

WORD DOSSIERS

12
verbhistorical-form prefix

feign

To invent, fabricate, make a likeness, or pretend; borrowed through Anglo-French from Latin fingere, to shape or fashion.

OPEN THE FULL LINEAGE ↗
nounhistorical-form prefix

fiction

Invented narrative, imaginative creation, pretense, or legal assumption; borrowed through French from Latin fictio, an action of shaping, molding, or feigning.

OPEN THE FULL LINEAGE ↗
noundossier summary

algorithm

A finite or stepwise procedure, descended through medieval arithmetic vocabulary from the Latinized name of al-Khwārizmī.

OPEN THE FULL LINEAGE ↗
nouncontrarian claim

bayou

English bayou, recorded by 1763, came from Louisiana French bayouque. An early Choctaw *bayok is a plausible proposed source, but the historical form and its alleged contraction to modern bók are not securely attested.

OPEN THE FULL LINEAGE ↗
Gothic class-III weak-verb lemmadossier summary

fijan

A Gothic class-III weak verb conventionally glossed hate or detest. Project Wulfila currently exposes 42 candidate tokens under fijan: 13 verified, eight further lexically unambiguous, and 21 explicitly ambiguous with the masculine nd-stem noun fijands, enemy. The surface inventory contains fifteen written shapes, including one exact infinitive fijan in John 7:7 and four j-less forms. Ayora Estevan shows why the overlap cannot be normalized away: Proto-Germanic had already lexicalized *fi(j)and- as enemy, while Gothic still used the matching present-participial formation for one who hates.

OPEN THE FULL LINEAGE ↗
Danish common-gender noundossier summary

fjende

Modern Danish fjende is the ordinary noun for a person, state, force, ideological opponent, or figurative thing that harms something else. Den Danske Ordbog derives it from Old Norse fjándi, compares German Feind, and identifies the older formation as a present participle of a verb corresponding to Old Norse fjá, to hate or persecute. Gammeldansk Ordbog records fiende broadly from 1100–1300. Ordbog over det danske Sprog preserves fiende, finde, and related spellings, an ordinary enemy sense, military and animal uses, abstract threats, and a special religious Devil branch. Holbergordbog shows that Fiende could still scan as either three syllables or two, alongside Fiænde, Finde, Fînde, and clipped Fiend. The word is therefore a grammatical fossil, not a current psychological definition: a lexicalized one-who-hates became the ordinary Danish enemy noun and accumulated broad contextual work. The current pronunciations are dictionary records, not retrojections into medieval Danish. No manuscript or print object is claimed as directly inspected.

OPEN THE FULL LINEAGE ↗
Old Norse verbdossier summary

fjá

Old Norse fjá was a verb meaning to hate. The Dictionary of Old Norse Prose classifies it as poetic and exposes zero prose citations; its glossarium links point to the early form fía and the reconstructed Proto-Germanic *fi(j)ēn-. Cleasby and Vigfússon call the verb obsolete, compare Gothic fijan and Old English feon or fjan, and locate it in Hýmiskviða 22 and Lokasenna 35, with the reflexive fjásk in Skírnismál 33. Fritzner independently gives the same three locations. The normalized verse texts preserve three different grammatical surfaces: goð fjá in Hýmiskviða, mangi fíár in Lokasenna, and Freyr fiásk in Skírnismál. Lexicon Poeticum likewise reports three poetic records, but explicitly warns that its concordance is unreviewed and that dates should be checked. These are source-reported lexical and edited-text records, not directly inspected manuscript objects, and three records in the reviewed poetic concordance are not a census of every Old Norse utterance. The finite verb became a tiny poetic fossil while its inherited participial relative fjándi became the ordinary enemy noun and accumulated 222 citations in ONP's prose corpus. Those corpus totals are not directly frequency-comparable, but the contrast makes the grammatical survival visible. The generated possible runic inscription shown by modern dictionary transcriptions is not historical evidence and is excluded. No historical sound recording exists, so the dossier does not fabricate one exact pronunciation.

OPEN THE FULL LINEAGE ↗
Old High German weak verbdossier summary

fīēn

Old High German fīēn—printed fîên in the Althochdeutsches Wörterbuch—was a weak verb meaning to hate, not love, be hostile to, detest, or reject. The official dictionary says it is attested only in Alemannic manuscripts of the eighth and ninth centuries, then inventories an infinitive fien, present participle fiendi, second-person singular preterite fietos, and accusative plural masculine past participle fieta. Three rule-text records concern hating discipline, one’s own will, or no person; gloss records align the participial forms with Latin exosus or exosos; and an Esther gloss aligns fien with detestari. These are source-reported edition and dictionary records, not directly inspected manuscript objects, and the broad manuscript horizon does not identify one exact first token. A separate twelfth-century article printed fien [sic] with the gloss ubere is explicitly left uninterpreted by the dictionary and is not merged into this hate verb. Beside the verb, Old High German had the already lexicalized enemy noun fīant, whose old participial character could still shine through in fixed phrases. The graph therefore shows a living daughter verb beside a grammatical fossil without pretending that either attested form is the reconstructed Proto-Germanic word itself. No historical sound recording exists and the dossier does not display a fabricated phonetic certainty.

OPEN THE FULL LINEAGE ↗
Gothic class-III weak-verb lemmadossier summary

hatan

A Gothic weak verb conventionally glossed hate, represented by exactly two currently reported corpus tokens: hatandane in Luke 1:71 and hatandans in Luke 6:27. Both are present participles; no surviving token writes the normalized infinitive. Their translation behavior defeats a one-word gloss: Luke 1 uses fijandam for enemies and hatandane for those hating, while Luke 6 uses hatandans for enemies and fijandam for those hating. Project Wulfila keeps class-III hatan separate from class-I hatjan, Braune calls the forms conjugational fluctuation, Orel publishes a reconstructed class-III alternation, and Sturtevant argues that the hatan shape may instead be a specifically Gothic secondary formation.

OPEN THE FULL LINEAGE ↗
noun · verbcontrarian claim

hate

An inherited Germanic hostility word whose English noun and verb histories converge imperfectly: Old English preserves both hete and hatian, Middle English may have remodeled the noun from the verb, and the proposed deeper Indo-European family remains semantically opaque.

OPEN THE FULL LINEAGE ↗
Gothic class-II weak-verb lemmacontrarian claim

hatizōn

A Gothic weak verb meaning be angry with or at someone, represented by exactly one verified corpus token: present active second-person plural hatizoþ in John 7:23. Project Wulfila and Streitberg align the form with Greek χολᾶτε in the question “are you angry at me?” and analyze the verb with a dative object. The University of Texas derivational grammar builds class-II hatizōn on the consonantal stem hatiz- of hatis “hatred” or “wrath”; Wright independently lists it as a class-II weak verb. The macronized infinitive is a scholarly citation form, while the manuscript writes only the inflected token without a vowel-length mark. The route continues through the reviewed Germanic noun family and a qualified Indo-European comparison, then stops. One corpus token cannot establish spoken rarity, first use, a complete semantic range, exact pronunciation, or one prehistoric essence.

OPEN THE FULL LINEAGE ↗
Gothic class-I weak-verb lemmadossier summary

hatjan

A Gothic weak verb meaning hate, represented by exactly one verified corpus token: the present participle hatjandam in Matthew 5:44. Project Wulfila lemmatizes that token as class-I hatjan, while the parallel Luke 6:27 command uses class-III hatandans from hatan. Braune treats the two shapes as conjugational fluctuation; Orel and the current corpus keep distinct formations visible. The normalized infinitive, the written participle, and the reconstructed parent are therefore never collapsed.

OPEN THE FULL LINEAGE ↗
02

ATTESTED / RECONSTRUCTED / BOUNDARY

HISTORICAL FORMS

7
03

WHERE INTERPRETATION IS TESTED

CLAIMS & DISPUTES

24

SCHOLARLY DISPUTES / 12

openboundaryposition text

Can aguacate be securely pushed deeper than āhuacatl?

Not from the reviewed sources. The institutional dictionaries reach the Nahuatl word and its historical witnesses but do not establish a deeper lexical ancestor.

openboundaryposition text

Is *lˤra the final word on the ancestry of tea?

It is the final reviewed reconstruction in this dossier, not a declaration that no deeper hypothesis exists. No unique deeper form is promoted until a competing analysis is encoded with direct evidence.

openproposedposition text

Can the movement family be pushed securely beyond *meue-?

Not from the reviewed evidence. Etymonline publishes *meue- for the movement root, but this dossier does not promote an older form without specialist comparative review.

openestablishedposition text

Does Lexicon Poeticum establish exactly ten or eleven poetic tokens?

No definitive total is promoted. The h-word list reports ten, while the headword page exposes eleven linked rows including variants; the project warns that the concordance is unreviewed.

openprobableposition text

Does the trailing star specifically mean that the nominative singular is unattested?

That is a plausible reading because Köbler lists only accusative, dative, and genitive evidence, but no explicit legend defining this exact trailing star was located in the reviewed source.

openestablishedposition text

Does the threat-whet route unveil the word's one true nature as sharpened hostility?

No. That is an evocative modern paraphrase, not an attested ancient definition. The route itself is disputed, and the visible contexts establish hostile disposition or intent without recovering prehistoric consciousness.

openproposedposition text

Is Finnish sauna ultimately an ancient Germanic loan?

Petri Kallio proposes Proto-Finnic *sakna as an ancient borrowing from Palaeo-Germanic *stagh-ná-, with pile or stack developing through stone-pile stove to sauna. The proposal has support but remains disputed.

openprobableposition text

Does tipi simply and literally mean “they dwell”?

The reviewed evidence safely derives thípi from a dwelling root; suffix analyses vary in how they label the final morphology, so the dossier promotes “dwelling” rather than one viral literal sentence.

openestablishedposition text

Can care, grief, mourning, affinity, and hate be ordered as one proven semantic chain?

No. The Greek senses are attested, but their internal chronology and the cross-branch prehistoric sequence are not recoverable as one linear ladder.

resolvedestablishedposition text

Does -logy simply mean “the study of”?

No. Merriam-Webster gives oral or written expression as one sense and doctrine, theory, or science as another; American Heritage separately gives discourse or expression and science, theory, or study. “Study of” is a useful reading in many formations, not a universal historical definition.

resolvedestablishedposition text

Did German Feind originally mean demon?

No. The High German record centers on enemy or adversary. DWB does document der böse Feind or der Feind for the Devil, but that is a historical specialization beside the ordinary enemy noun, not the original definition.

resolvedestablishedposition text

Does every modern Feind literally mean one who hates?

No. The participial source is historical morphology. Modern Duden senses include personal enemy, hostile power or force, and a determined opponent of something without requiring a recoverable emotion in every token.

CONTRARIAN TRUTHS / 12

RANK 2GRADE Aranked reveal

Truth began with firmness and fidelity.

Before truth centered factual correspondence, its family named what was firm, faithful, and steadfast.

RANK 4GRADE Aranked reveal

Humility is an earth-and-lowness metaphor.

Latin humus “ground” produced humilis “low,” then humilitās “lowness,” before the moral virtue.

RANK 6GRADE Aranked reveal

Evidence became a thread you could follow.

Old English cliewen was a ball of thread; the labyrinth metaphor turned it into guidance through uncertainty.

RANK 7GRADE Aranked reveal

Nice crossed from ignorance to approval.

Latin nescius “ignorant” became foolish or wanton, then fastidious and precise, and finally pleasant or kind.

RANK 16GRADE Aranked reveal

Humiliation is evidenced in English before humiliate.

Chaucer’s Middle English humiliacioun occurs in a humility passage; Merriam-Webster reports the English verb humiliate only circa 1534. Christian Latin and French preserve lowering, abasement, mortification, and self-humbling before current definitions center degradation, disgrace, and shame.

RANK 40GRADE Aranked reveal

Modern Danish kept the enemy but lost the hate verb inside its grammar.

DDO identifies fjende as historically a present participle of a verb corresponding to Old Norse fjá, to hate or persecute. Old Danish fiende then survives through a remarkable surface cloud: Fiende, Fiænde, Finde, Fînde, clipped Fiend, and both two- and three-syllable scans. The current noun no longer means that every enemy literally feels hate; it names active opposition and extends to states, ideologies, animals, weather, and abstractions. The grammatical fossil unveils a history, not a timeless essence.

RANK 41GRADE Aranked reveal

The enemy fossil and the living hate verb coexisted in Old High German.

AWB records fîên as a weak verb only in eighth- and ninth-century Alemannic manuscripts, but the pocket preserves an infinitive, present participle, preterite, and past participle across hate, hostility, detestation, and rejection. Beside it, fîant was already a strong masculine enemy noun whose old participial character could still shine through in fixed phrases. Old High German therefore preserves both sides of the history at once: the live verbal family and the noun already lexicalized from it. The evidence reveals a grammatical relationship, not the psychology of every enemy and not a securely recovered Proto-Indo-European essence.

RANK 42GRADE Acontrarian claim

The ordinary Old Norse enemy outlived the finite hate verb behind it.

ONP classifies fjá as poetic and exposes no prose citations. Cleasby, Fritzner, and Lexicon Poeticum converge on three Eddic contexts, while normalized texts preserve active fjá, finite fíár, and reflexive fiásk. Cleasby then points to fjándi as the participial relative that remained across Germanic. ONP gives that separate enemy noun 222 prose citations and a large semantic range. The two corpus totals are not directly frequency-comparable, and neither proves an exact extinction event; together they reveal the asymmetry between a tiny finite-verb record and the prolific lexicalized enemy branch.

RANK 45GRADE Aranked reveal

One Gothic anger verb survives in one question—and not in its dictionary form.

Project Wulfila’s complete current inventory contains one hatizōn token: hatizoþ in John 7:23, “are you angry at me?” Codex Argenteus folio 94v directly preserves the inflection. The manuscript never writes the normalized infinitive or its editorial macron. Grammar then reveals another layer: hatizōn is a class-II verb built from the consonantal stem hatiz- of hatis “hatred” or “wrath.” One English gloss therefore hides a noun-to-verb formation, one surviving grammatical person, and a sharp boundary between pixels and reconstruction.

RANK 51GRADE Aranked reveal

Care, grief, funerals, and in-laws occupy one Greek noun—but hate does not secretly mean care.

LSJ's κῆδος entry moves through care and concern, anxiety and grief, troubles, mourning and funeral rites, an object of care, and connection by marriage. Homeric κήδεʼ can be many-troubled woes; Aeschylus can make Helen an object of care while playing on marriage affinity. Comparative sources then place the noun beside Celtic and Germanic hatred words under *ḱh₂d-es- and *ḱeh₂d-. The reveal is not a mystical reversal in which hate “really” means care. Merriam-Webster calls the semantic relations far from transparent, Liberman challenges the wider family's unity, and the Greek evidence itself resists a single linear story.

RANK 55GRADE Aranked reveal

frændi is friend’s cognate—but kinship became its Old Norse center.

The Germanic family did not carry one frozen dictionary definition into every daughter language. OED places Old Icelandic frændi beside English friend; Cleasby–Vigfússon and Fritzner preserve the old participial analysis; ONP then exposes what happened in use. Its 225 citations distinguish friend, foster brother or companion, kinsman or son, parents, and ancestor, with no sharp wall between friend and kin. The unveiling is semantic divergence backed by a shared graph: English centers chosen companion, while the Scandinavian cognate centers family without ceasing to be cognate.

RANK 56GRADE Aranked reveal

The Old English friend was a loving-agent noun—but not merely a modern intimate.

OED and Bosworth–Toller preserve the morphology behind frēond: an inherited nd-stem formation tied to the verb meaning free or love. The same sources then refuse a slogan-sized definition. Old English uses cover close companion, ally or non-enemy, relation, friend of God, friend versus foe, and friends acting as arbitrators. Cotton MS Vitellius A XV folio 152r visibly preserves freondum in a hall filled with favored people at Beowulf 1018. The unveiling is not that friend secretly means love in every sentence; it is that a loving-agent fossil became a socially versatile noun before modern English existed.

04

BOOKS / DICTIONARIES / ARTICLES / DATABASES

SOURCES

12
historical dictionary102 CLAIM LINKS

Hate — definition, etymology, and first known use

Merriam-Webster Editors / 2026

source titleAUDIT EVERY USE ↗
historical dictionary20 CLAIM LINKS

Wife — Definition and Word History

Merriam-Webster Editors / 2026

source titleAUDIT EVERY USE ↗
institutional lexicon20 CLAIM LINKS

hetzen — Rechtschreibung, Bedeutung, Definition, Herkunft

Dudenredaktion

source titleAUDIT EVERY USE ↗
historical dictionary16 CLAIM LINKS

Dairy — Definition, Word History, and First Known Use

Merriam-Webster Editors / 2026

source titleAUDIT EVERY USE ↗
historical dictionary14 CLAIM LINKS

Chai — Definition and Word History

Merriam-Webster Editors / 2026

source titleAUDIT EVERY USE ↗
historical dictionary14 CLAIM LINKS

Dialogue — Definition, Word History, and First Known Use

Merriam-Webster Editors / 2026

source titleAUDIT EVERY USE ↗
historical dictionary14 CLAIM LINKS

Humiliate — Definition, Word History, and First Known Use

Merriam-Webster Editors / 2026

source titleAUDIT EVERY USE ↗
historical dictionary13 CLAIM LINKS

Adverb — Definition, Word History, and First Known Use

Merriam-Webster Editors / 2026

source titleAUDIT EVERY USE ↗
historical dictionary13 CLAIM LINKS

Candid — Definition, Word History, and First Known Use

Merriam-Webster Editors / 2026

source titleAUDIT EVERY USE ↗
historical dictionary13 CLAIM LINKS

Fiction — Definition, Word History, and First Known Use

Merriam-Webster Editors / 2026

source titleAUDIT EVERY USE ↗
historical dictionary13 CLAIM LINKS

Husband — Definition, Word History, and First Known Use

Merriam-Webster Editors / 2026

source titleAUDIT EVERY USE ↗
historical dictionary12 CLAIM LINKS

Kindred — definition, etymology, and first known use

Merriam-Webster Editors / 2026

source titleAUDIT EVERY USE ↗
05

FIRST USES & HISTORICAL OBJECTS

ATTESTATION WITNESSES

12
DIRECTLY INSPECTEDprinted book

The first edition of the Académie française dictionary prints DESASTRE as a headword and defines it as a disastrous accident or misfortune.

désastre / disaster / 1694

Le dictionnaire de l'Académie française. Tome 1 (A–L), première éditionreporting source / OPEN RECORD ↗
DIRECTLY INSPECTEDprinted book

The e-rara object record and searchable scan locate John Harris's dictionary definition of algorithm.

algorithm / algorithm / 1704

Lexicon technicum: or, an universal English dictionary of arts and sciencesreporting source / OPEN RECORD ↗
DIRECTLY INSPECTEDprinted book

John Harris’s Lexicon technicum prints DECIMAL in the head phrase DECIMAL Fraction and begins its mathematical definition.

decimal / decimal / 1704

Lexicon technicum: or, an universal English dictionary of arts and sciencesreporting source / OPEN RECORD ↗
DIRECTLY INSPECTEDprinted book

John Harris’s Lexicon technicum prints MUSCLE as a headword and defines its role in voluntary animal motion.

muscle / muscle / 1704

Lexicon technicum: or, an universal English dictionary of arts and sciencesreporting source / OPEN RECORD ↗
DIRECTLY INSPECTEDprinted book

John Harris’s Lexicon technicum prints ETYMOLOGY as a headword and defines it as the part of grammar concerned with words’ origins and true signification.

etymology / etymology / 1704

Lexicon technicum: or, an universal English dictionary of arts and sciencesreporting source / OPEN RECORD ↗
DIRECTLY INSPECTEDprinted book

The SYSTEM entry in John Harris’s Lexicon technicum uses Science for an organized branch of knowledge when defining a system of philosophy.

science / science / 1704

Lexicon technicum: or, an universal English dictionary of arts and sciencesreporting source / OPEN RECORD ↗
SOURCE REPORTEDlexicographic first use

Merriam-Webster first-known-use report

bride / bride / before the 12th century

Bride — Definition, Word History, and First Known Usereporting source / OPEN RECORD ↗
SOURCE REPORTEDlexicographic first use

Merriam-Webster first-known-use record for king

king / king / before the 12th century

King — definition, etymology, and first known usereporting source / OPEN RECORD ↗
SOURCE REPORTEDlexicographic first use

Merriam-Webster first-known-use record for kin

kin / kin / before the 12th century

Kin — definition, etymology, and first known usereporting source / OPEN RECORD ↗
SOURCE REPORTEDlexicographic first use

Merriam-Webster first-known-use record for kind as a noun

kind / kind / before the 12th century

Kind — definition, etymology, and first known usereporting source / OPEN RECORD ↗
SOURCE REPORTEDlexicographic first use

Merriam-Webster first-known-use record for kindred as a noun

kindred / kindred / before the 12th century

Kindred — definition, etymology, and first known usereporting source / OPEN RECORD ↗
SOURCE REPORTEDlexical corpus record

Merriam-Webster report of kynrædan

cynræden / cynrēde / kindred / late Old English, unique inflected form

Kindred — definition, etymology, and first known usereporting source / OPEN RECORD ↗
06

SEARCH IS DISCOVERY, NOT PROOF

EVERY RESULT OPENS A PERMANENT EVIDENCE RECORD.

Matching text only locates a record. It does not raise confidence, settle a dispute, establish cognacy, or turn a source report into direct inspection. Follow the result into its citations and editorial limits.