CLAIM / COUNTERCLAIM / LIMITRECORD 78
DISPUTE
RECORD.
One scholarly question. Every attached source. The present editorial state, without pretending the last word has been written.
openboundary
Is *lˤra the final word on the ancestry of tea?
It is the final reviewed reconstruction in this dossier, not a declaration that no deeper hypothesis exists. No unique deeper form is promoted until a competing analysis is encoded with direct evidence.
WORD UNDER REVIEWDISPUTE 78
chai
/tʃaɪ/ · noun
In current English, a South Asian-style tea commonly prepared with milk and spices; the word belongs to the overland cha/chay transmission family ultimately derived from Chinese 茶.
01DIRECT CLAIM EVIDENCE
2 SOURCES WITH A STANCE
A citation is not a vote. Each record says whether the work supports, challenges, contradicts, or contextualizes the position—and identifies the exact locus used.
SOURCE 01supportsscholarly database
Baxter–Sagart Old Chinese Reconstruction, Version 1.1
Supplies *lˤra as the reviewed Old Chinese reconstruction and no single deeper form in this dataset.
Table row 茶 chá, PDF page 11- AUTHOR / EDITOR
- William H. Baxter and Laurent Sagart
- YEAR
- 2014
- PUBLISHER
- University of Michigan Linguistics
SOURCE 02contexttypological database
Chapter 138: Tea
Supports Chinese origin for the major global families while also documenting forms outside them.
Chapter 138, introductory and distributional discussion- AUTHOR / EDITOR
- Östen Dahl
- YEAR
- 2013
- PUBLISHER
- The World Atlas of Language Structures Online
02 / EDITORIAL STATE
THE QUESTION REMAINS OPEN.
- CONFIDENCE
- boundary
- STATUS
- open
- LEGACY SOURCE SUMMARY
- Baxter and Sagart provide the Old Chinese reconstruction; WALS supports the Chinese-derived global families but does not establish one deeper ancestor.
WHY NO RESOLUTIONThe reviewed evidence does not yet warrant collapsing the competing or incomplete analyses into one secure answer.