820 canonical forms + 578 route stages.
THE TIMELINE ATLAS
JOURNEY ATLAS ↗FORM / ROUTE / BOUND
1398 REVIEWED EVENTSLANGUAGE
IN TIME.
One cross-word chronology for every defensibly bounded form and journey stage—without converting a vague historical label into a fake year.
A reviewed graph bound, not a claim of an earliest human word.
Only stages with directly cited numeric bounds enter this atlas.
Labels remain visible in Journey Atlas, but not parsed into false years.
0046 MATCHING EVENTS
FILTER THE CHRONOLOGY
WHEN DID THE EVIDENCE LAND?
TWO CLOCKS.
NO FALSE PRECISION.
FORM CHRONOLOGY dates a canonical linguistic form or reconstruction in the lexical graph.
ROUTE CHRONOLOGY dates a geographic or transmission stage in a word’s journey.
They can share an era band, but they are never silently treated as the same kind of claim.
CROSS-WORD CHRONOLOGY / EARLIEST BOUND FIRST
THE EVIDENCE IN TIME
Prehistory9 ON THIS PAGE
4500 BCE–2500 BCErange
ROUTE STAGEDisputed Indo-European comparative horizon
hate
*ḱeh₂d- and *ḱh₂d-es-
A formal comparison extends beyond Germanic, but neither one original meaning nor one point homeland is established.
4500 BCE–2500 BCErange
ROUTE STAGEProto-Indo-European linguistic horizon
fijan
proposed *peh₁- comparison
A deeper harm, blame, suffering, or hate comparison is published, but the precise formal route and original semantic center remain proposed.
1 EVIDENCE LINK
A conventional linguistic interval for a proposed reconstruction, not a dated inscription or speaker community point.
AUDIT RECORD ↗4500 BCE–2500 BCErange
ROUTE STAGEProto-Indo-European linguistic horizon
fijands
proposed *peh₁- comparison
A deeper harm, blame, suffering, or hate comparison is published, but the formal route and original semantic center remain proposed.
1 EVIDENCE LINK
A conventional linguistic interval for a proposed reconstruction, not a dated inscription or single community point.
AUDIT RECORD ↗4500 BCE–2500 BCErange
ROUTE STAGEProto-Indo-European linguistic horizon
fēond
proposed *peh₁- comparison
A deeper harm, blame, suffering, or hate comparison is published, but its exact formation and semantic unity remain proposed.
1 EVIDENCE LINK
A conventional reconstruction interval, not a dated inscription or mappable speech community.
AUDIT RECORD ↗4500 BCE–2500 BCErange
ROUTE STAGEProto-Indo-European linguistic horizon
fēogan
proposed *peh₁- comparison
A deeper harm, blame, suffering, or hate comparison is published, but its exact formation and semantic unity remain proposed.
1 EVIDENCE LINK
A conventional reconstruction interval, not a dated inscription or mappable speech community.
AUDIT RECORD ↗4500 BCE–2500 BCErange
ROUTE STAGEProto-Indo-European linguistic horizon
fiend
proposed *peh₁- comparison
A deeper harm, blame, suffering, or hate comparison is published, but its exact formation and semantic unity remain proposed.
1 EVIDENCE LINK
A conventional reconstruction interval, not a dated inscription or mappable speech community.
AUDIT RECORD ↗4500 BCE–2500 BCErange
ROUTE STAGEProto-Indo-European linguistic horizon
Feind
proposed *peh₁- comparison
A deeper harm, blame, suffering, or hate comparison is published, but its exact formation and semantic unity remain proposed.
2 EVIDENCE LINKS
A conventional reconstruction interval, not a dated inscription or mappable speech community.
AUDIT RECORD ↗4500 BCE–2500 BCErange
ROUTE STAGEProposed Indo-European linguistic horizon
cais
*kad- and *kad-t/si-
The deepest displayed route is a cross-branch comparative proposal. No archaeological point, single speech community, or original love-versus-hate meaning is asserted.
4500 BCE–2500 BCErange
ROUTE STAGEProposed Indo-European hate-grief horizon
hōti
UT k̑ād- lane crosswalked to the reviewed *ḱeh₂d- proposal
The other route places hōti with the hate family. Its semantic unity and exact reconstruction remain qualified.
1 EVIDENCE LINK
Competing comparative lane, not a second event in a single linear journey.
AUDIT RECORD ↗Antiquity21 ON THIS PAGE
500 BCE–200 CErange
ROUTE STAGEProto-Germanic linguistic horizon
hatred
*hatiz- and *hatōjan-
The secure comparative family contains a hate or enmity noun and a related verb formation, reconstructed from attested Germanic descendants.
2 EVIDENCE LINKS
The range is linguistic, not an archaeological location or first-use date.
AUDIT RECORD ↗500 BCE–200 CErange
ROUTE STAGEProto-Germanic linguistic horizon
hate
*hatiz- and *hatōjan-
The reconstructed noun and derived weak verb are supported by attested Germanic comparanda.
500 BCE–200 CErange
ROUTE STAGEProto-Germanic linguistic horizon
fijands
*fi(j)ēn- hate verb
The reconstructed verb supplies the base for the active-participial enemy formation.
500 BCE–200 CErange
ROUTE STAGEProto-Germanic linguistic horizon
fijands
lexicalized *fi(j)and- enemy formation
Cross-branch enemy nouns show that one who hates had lexicalized as enemy before the surviving Gothic record.
2 EVIDENCE LINKS
The interval does not identify an exact lexicalization event or speaker.
AUDIT RECORD ↗500 BCE–200 CErange
ROUTE STAGEProto-Germanic linguistic horizon
fēond
*fi(j)ēn- and lexicalized *fi(j)and-
Germanic branches preserve both the hate verb and lexicalized present-participial enemy noun. The asterisked forms are comparative reconstructions.
2 EVIDENCE LINKS
A comparative-linguistic interval rather than an attested spelling date.
AUDIT RECORD ↗500 BCE–200 CErange
ROUTE STAGEProto-Germanic linguistic horizon
fēogan
reconstructed *fi(j)ēn-
Germanic branches preserve related hate verbs, but the displayed form is comparative reconstruction.
2 EVIDENCE LINKS
A comparative-linguistic interval rather than an attested spelling date.
AUDIT RECORD ↗500 BCE–200 CErange
ROUTE STAGEProto-Germanic linguistic horizon
fiend
*fi(j)ēn- and lexicalized *fi(j)and-
Germanic branches preserve both the hate verb and lexicalized present-participial enemy noun. The asterisked forms are comparative reconstructions.
2 EVIDENCE LINKS
A comparative-linguistic interval rather than an attested spelling date.
AUDIT RECORD ↗500 BCE–200 CErange
ROUTE STAGEProto-Germanic linguistic horizon
hassen
*xatēnan ~ *xatōjanan beside *hatiz-
Comparative Germanic forms support a verb family beside the hate noun base while exact formation, ablaut, and semantic direction remain analytical.
500 BCE–200 CErange
ROUTE STAGEProto-Germanic linguistic horizon
vijand
*fi(j)ēn- and *fi(j)and-
The hate verb and lexicalized participial enemy noun are comparative reconstructions shared across Germanic branches.
500 BCE–200 CErange
ROUTE STAGEProto-Germanic linguistic horizon
fiende
*fi(j)ēn- and *fi(j)and-
The hate verb and lexicalized participial enemy noun are comparative reconstructions shared across Germanic branches.
3 EVIDENCE LINKS
Comparative bounds, not directly dated spoken tokens or a single geographic point.
AUDIT RECORD ↗500 BCE–200 CErange
ROUTE STAGEProto-Germanic linguistic horizon
fīant
*fi(j)ēn- and lexicalized *fi(j)and-
Cross-branch evidence places the hate verb and lexicalized enemy formation before the separate written Germanic traditions.
2 EVIDENCE LINKS
Comparative bounds, not a directly dated spoken token or single coordinate.
AUDIT RECORD ↗500 BCE–200 CErange
ROUTE STAGEProto-Germanic linguistic horizon
fjándi
*fi(j)ēn- and lexicalized *fi(j)and-
Cross-branch evidence places the hate verb and lexicalized enemy formation before the separate written Germanic traditions.
2 EVIDENCE LINKS
Comparative bounds, not a directly dated spoken token or single coordinate.
AUDIT RECORD ↗500 BCE–200 CErange
ROUTE STAGEProto-Germanic linguistic horizon
fjende
*fi(j)ēn- and lexicalized *fi(j)and-
Cross-branch evidence places the hate verb and enemy formation before the written Germanic traditions.
2 EVIDENCE LINKS
Comparative bounds, not a directly dated spoken token or single coordinate.
AUDIT RECORD ↗500 BCE–200 CErange
ROUTE STAGEProto-Germanic linguistic horizon
fīēn
reconstructed *fi(j)ēn-
Cross-branch evidence places the hate verb before the separate written Germanic traditions.
1 EVIDENCE LINK
Comparative bounds, not a directly dated spoken token or single coordinate.
AUDIT RECORD ↗500 BCE–200 CErange
ROUTE STAGEProto-Germanic linguistic horizon
fjá
reconstructed *fi(j)ēn-
Cross-branch evidence places the hate verb before the separate written Germanic traditions.
1 EVIDENCE LINK
Comparative bounds, not a directly dated spoken token or single coordinate.
AUDIT RECORD ↗500 BCE–200 CErange
ROUTE STAGEProto-Germanic linguistic horizon
hazzōn
*xatēnan ~ *xatōjanan beside *hatiz-
Comparative Germanic forms support a weak-verb family beside the hate noun base while exact formation, ablaut, and semantic direction remain analytical.
500 BCE–200 CErange
ROUTE STAGEProto-Germanic linguistic horizon
fīunt
*fi(j)ēn- and lexicalized *fi(j)and-
Cross-branch evidence places the hate verb and enemy-agent formation before the separate written Germanic traditions.
2 EVIDENCE LINKS
Comparative bounds, not a directly dated spoken token or single coordinate.
AUDIT RECORD ↗500 BCE–200 CErange
ROUTE STAGEProto-Germanic linguistic horizon
hōti
competing *hwōtja- and *hatiz- parent analyses
Cross-source disagreement begins before the Old Saxon record: one source reconstructs a threat-related adjective, another classifies the form with hate.
2 EVIDENCE LINKS
Comparative bounds, not a directly dated spoken form or exact homeland.
AUDIT RECORD ↗300 CE–399 CEcentury
ROUTE STAGEFourth-century Gothic translation tradition
fijands
fijands noun beside productive fijan participles
Gothic retained both the inherited enemy noun and the live one-who-hates participle; 21 surviving candidates remain shared between them.
3 EVIDENCE LINKS
The century dates the translation tradition rather than each manuscript or the birth of the noun.
AUDIT RECORD ↗450 CE–1066 CErange
ROUTE STAGEOld English-speaking England
fēogan
fēogan, fiógan, feón, and fión
The dictionary paradigm and examples preserve a native hate-or-persecute verb across spelling, contraction, and inflectional variation.
2 EVIDENCE LINKS
A broad language-period bound, not a first-utterance date or one defensible coordinate.
AUDIT RECORD ↗450 CE–1150 CErange
ROUTE STAGEOld English records
hatred
hete and hatian
English records preserve both noun and verb. The later noun hate can be analyzed as direct continuation with remodeling or as a derivative from the verb that replaced hete.
2 EVIDENCE LINKS
The Old English forms are attested; their later lexical convergence is not assigned to one event.
AUDIT RECORD ↗UNBOUNDED IS
A REAL RESULT.
Stages without source-backed numeric bounds stay in their complete Journey Atlas route, carry an explicit temporal note, and remain absent here until the evidence supports normalization. The missing point is visible work—not permission to guess.