*SET-U

THE TIMELINE ATLAS

JOURNEY ATLAS ↗

FORM / ROUTE / BOUND

1398 REVIEWED EVENTS

LANGUAGE
IN TIME.

One cross-word chronology for every defensibly bounded form and journey stage—without converting a vague historical label into a fake year.

1398BOUNDED EVENTS

820 canonical forms + 578 route stages.

4500 BCEEARLIEST ENCODED BOUND

A reviewed graph bound, not a claim of an earliest human word.

578NORMALIZED JOURNEY STAGES

Only stages with directly cited numeric bounds enter this atlas.

381JOURNEY DATES WITHHELD

Labels remain visible in Journey Atlas, but not parsed into false years.

00

FILTER THE CHRONOLOGY

WHEN DID THE EVIDENCE LAND?

1398 MATCHING EVENTS
THE TEMPORAL CONTRACT

TWO CLOCKS.
NO FALSE PRECISION.

FORM CHRONOLOGY dates a canonical linguistic form or reconstruction in the lexical graph.

ROUTE CHRONOLOGY dates a geographic or transmission stage in a word’s journey.

They can share an era band, but they are never silently treated as the same kind of claim.

01

CROSS-WORD CHRONOLOGY / EARLIEST BOUND FIRST

THE EVIDENCE IN TIME

PAGE 19 / 47
Medieval30 ON THIS PAGE
700 CE–1350 CErange
CANONICAL FORMOld Norse

traust

Old Norse

confidence, firmness

3 EVIDENCE LINKS

Canonical form chronology encoded in the reviewed lexical graph.

AUDIT RECORD ↗
700 CE–1500 CErange
ROUTE STAGEScandinavia and the Old Norse world

law

approximately 700–1500

Old Norse lag and lög connect laying and order with law before and during Scandinavian contact with English.

2 EVIDENCE LINKS

The interval is the documented language horizon, not the coinage date of one legal sense.

AUDIT RECORD ↗
700 CE–1500 CErange
CANONICAL FORMOld Norse

lǫg / lög; lag

Old Norse

law; a laying, layer, order, or disposition

4 EVIDENCE LINKS

Canonical form chronology encoded in the reviewed lexical graph.

AUDIT RECORD ↗
700 CE–1500 CErange
CANONICAL FORMOld Norse

hūsbōndi

Old Norse

householder; master of a house

5 EVIDENCE LINKS

Canonical form chronology encoded in the reviewed lexical graph.

AUDIT RECORD ↗
700 CE–1500 CErange
CANONICAL FORMOld Norse

bōndi

Old Norse

householder; dweller

3 EVIDENCE LINKS

Canonical form chronology encoded in the reviewed lexical graph.

AUDIT RECORD ↗
700 CE–1500 CErange
CANONICAL FORMOld Norse

būa

Old Norse

to dwell; inhabit; prepare

2 EVIDENCE LINKS

Canonical form chronology encoded in the reviewed lexical graph.

AUDIT RECORD ↗
700 CE–1500 CErange
CANONICAL FORMOld Norse

hūs

Old Norse

house

2 EVIDENCE LINKS

Canonical form chronology encoded in the reviewed lexical graph.

AUDIT RECORD ↗
700 CE–1500 CErange
ROUTE STAGEOld Norse textual world

frændi

frændi / editorial frǽndi

ONP documents friend, foster-brother or companion, relative or son, parents, and ancestor uses across the Old Norse prose record without reducing the language to one birthplace.

1 EVIDENCE LINK

Conventional Old Norse bounds; individual manuscript ranges are preserved separately.

AUDIT RECORD ↗
700 CE–1500 CErange
CANONICAL FORMMedieval Latin

exhumare

Medieval Latin

to remove from the earth

3 EVIDENCE LINKS

Canonical form chronology encoded in the reviewed lexical graph.

AUDIT RECORD ↗
700 CE–1500 CErange
CANONICAL FORMOld Norse

hatr

Old Norse textual record

hatred, enmity, spite; perhaps mockery or scorn in one uncertain context

9 EVIDENCE LINKS

Canonical form chronology encoded in the reviewed lexical graph.

AUDIT RECORD ↗
700 CE–1500 CErange
CANONICAL FORMOld Norse

hata

Old Norse prose and poetic record

to persecute; reject or despise; humiliate; hate; damage or destroy in poetic use; become or remain hostile in reflexive constructions

12 EVIDENCE LINKS

Canonical form chronology encoded in the reviewed lexical graph.

AUDIT RECORD ↗
700 CE–1500 CErange
CANONICAL FORMOld Norse

frændi

Old Norse poetic and prose record

friend or companion; especially kinsman, relative, son, parent, or ancestor

10 EVIDENCE LINKS

Canonical form chronology encoded in the reviewed lexical graph.

AUDIT RECORD ↗
700 CE–1550 CErange
CANONICAL FORMOld Norse

fjándi

Old Norse poetic and prose record

enemy or opponent; devil, demon, evil spirit, pagan god, Satan, or a derogatory hated being or thing

15 EVIDENCE LINKS

Canonical form chronology encoded in the reviewed lexical graph.

AUDIT RECORD ↗
700 CE–2026 CErange
CANONICAL FORMPresent-Day English

December

before the 12th century–today

the twelfth month of the Gregorian calendar

3 EVIDENCE LINKS

Canonical form chronology encoded in the reviewed lexical graph.

AUDIT RECORD ↗
725 CE–1150 CErange
CANONICAL FORMOld English

lufu

before 725–c. 1150

love, affection, friendliness

5 EVIDENCE LINKS

Canonical form chronology encoded in the reviewed lexical graph.

AUDIT RECORD ↗
750 CE–799 CEcentury
ROUTE STAGEOld High German textual world

Feind

fīant and fījant from the eighth century

DWDS/Pfeifer dates the forms to the eighth century; Duden prints fīand and identifies the hating-participle analysis.

2 EVIDENCE LINKS

The century is source-reported and does not identify one manuscript, first speaker, or single coordinate.

AUDIT RECORD ↗
750 CE–799 CEcentury
ROUTE STAGEOld High German textual world

Hass

haʒ reported from the eighth century

DWDS/Pfeifer dates the form to the eighth century; the public source does not identify one inspected manuscript object in this dossier.

2 EVIDENCE LINKS

The representative attestation year is a century marker, not an exact first use.

AUDIT RECORD ↗
750 CE–799 CEcentury
ROUTE STAGEOld High German textual world

fīant

fīant and fījant reported from the eighth century

DWDS/Pfeifer supplies a century-level headword horizon; AWB documents the later corpus in extensive detail.

2 EVIDENCE LINKS

A source-reported century, not one first token, manuscript, speaker, or map point.

AUDIT RECORD ↗
750 CE–799 CEcentury
ROUTE STAGEAlemannic manuscript world

fīēn

eighth-century fîên records

AWB says the verb occurs only in Alemannic manuscripts of the eighth and ninth centuries; individual records are not converted into invented modern coordinates.

1 EVIDENCE LINK

A dictionary-reported manuscript horizon, not an exact token date or object inspection.

AUDIT RECORD ↗
750 CE–899 CErange
CANONICAL FORMOld High German

fīēn

Old High German; only in Alemannic manuscripts of the eighth and ninth centuries

to hate, not love, be hostile to, detest, or reject

10 EVIDENCE LINKS

Canonical form chronology encoded in the reviewed lexical graph.

AUDIT RECORD ↗
750 CE–1050 CErange
CANONICAL FORMOld High German

liubī

Old High German, attested from the tenth century

love, affection, esteem, pleasure, favor

5 EVIDENCE LINKS

Canonical form chronology encoded in the reviewed lexical graph.

AUDIT RECORD ↗
750 CE–1050 CErange
CANONICAL FORMOld High German

liob

Old High German

dear, beloved, pleasing

4 EVIDENCE LINKS

Canonical form chronology encoded in the reviewed lexical graph.

AUDIT RECORD ↗
750 CE–1050 CErange
ROUTE STAGEOld High German reconstruction horizon

hetzen

*hezzen

A projected High German bridge is useful for formal continuity but is explicitly starred in Bailey’s data and therefore receives no manuscript pin.

2 EVIDENCE LINKS

The numeric bounds are the historical language period, not dates of a directly inspected token.

AUDIT RECORD ↗
750 CE–1050 CErange
ROUTE STAGEOld High German textual world

hassen

haʒʒēn / haʒʒōn and reported pursuit glosses

Duden publishes the variants; DWB reports Graff forms aligned with following or pursuing. No primary object was directly inspected for this stage.

2 EVIDENCE LINKS

The language-period interval does not identify a first use or date the proposed action sense.

AUDIT RECORD ↗
750 CE–1050 CErange
ROUTE STAGEOld High German transmission

hazzōn

ēn / ōn double forms as a corpus-wide problem

Research on the complete attested Old High German ēn-verb corpus finds recurring ōn double forms and identifies the Franconian area as a transition zone. The accessible abstract does not establish hazzōn as one of its twenty repeated examples.

1 EVIDENCE LINK

The interval represents the Old High German textual period, not a date for one token or one paradigm shift.

AUDIT RECORD ↗
750 CE–1050 CErange
CANONICAL FORMOld High German

wīb

Old High German

woman; wife in recorded expressions

4 EVIDENCE LINKS

Canonical form chronology encoded in the reviewed lexical graph.

AUDIT RECORD ↗
750 CE–1050 CErange
ROUTE STAGEOld High German textual record

Freund

friunt from the eighth century

Pfeifer dates the form to the eighth century; Grimm supplies source-reported Old High German quotations.

2 EVIDENCE LINKS

Conventional Old High German bounds with individually qualified witness records.

AUDIT RECORD ↗
750 CE–1050 CErange
CANONICAL FORMOld High German

brūt

Old High German

bride

1 EVIDENCE LINK

Canonical form chronology encoded in the reviewed lexical graph.

AUDIT RECORD ↗
750 CE–1050 CErange
CANONICAL FORMOld High German

*hezzen

reconstructed Old High German bridge

a reconstructed weak verb meaning chase or persecute

5 EVIDENCE LINKS

Canonical form chronology encoded in the reviewed lexical graph.

AUDIT RECORD ↗
750 CE–1050 CErange
CANONICAL FORMOld High German

fīant

Old High German, recorded from the eighth century

enemy; substantivized hating participant

21 EVIDENCE LINKS

Canonical form chronology encoded in the reviewed lexical graph.

AUDIT RECORD ↗
02 / WHAT STAYS OUT

UNBOUNDED IS
A REAL RESULT.

Stages without source-backed numeric bounds stay in their complete Journey Atlas route, carry an explicit temporal note, and remain absent here until the evidence supports normalization. The missing point is visible work—not permission to guess.

INSPECT ALL JOURNEYS ↗EXPORT TIMELINE EVENTS ↗