*SET-U

THE TIMELINE ATLAS

JOURNEY ATLAS ↗

FORM / ROUTE / BOUND

1398 REVIEWED EVENTS

LANGUAGE
IN TIME.

One cross-word chronology for every defensibly bounded form and journey stage—without converting a vague historical label into a fake year.

1398BOUNDED EVENTS

820 canonical forms + 578 route stages.

4500 BCEEARLIEST ENCODED BOUND

A reviewed graph bound, not a claim of an earliest human word.

578NORMALIZED JOURNEY STAGES

Only stages with directly cited numeric bounds enter this atlas.

381JOURNEY DATES WITHHELD

Labels remain visible in Journey Atlas, but not parsed into false years.

00

FILTER THE CHRONOLOGY

WHEN DID THE EVIDENCE LAND?

1398 MATCHING EVENTS
THE TEMPORAL CONTRACT

TWO CLOCKS.
NO FALSE PRECISION.

FORM CHRONOLOGY dates a canonical linguistic form or reconstruction in the lexical graph.

ROUTE CHRONOLOGY dates a geographic or transmission stage in a word’s journey.

They can share an era band, but they are never silently treated as the same kind of claim.

01

CROSS-WORD CHRONOLOGY / EARLIEST BOUND FIRST

THE EVIDENCE IN TIME

PAGE 10 / 47
Antiquity30 ON THIS PAGE
500 BCE–200 CErange
ROUTE STAGEProto-Germanic linguistic horizon

hatia

*xatēnan ~ *xatōjanan beside *hatiz-

Orel's Gothic, Old English, Old Frisian, Old Saxon, Old Norse, and Old High German set supports a shared verb family while leaving reconstruction detail open.

1 EVIDENCE LINK

Comparative bounds, not a directly dated spoken token.

AUDIT RECORD ↗
500 BCE–200 CErange
CANONICAL FORMProto-Germanic

*bōwan

Proto-Germanic

to dwell; live

2 EVIDENCE LINKS

Canonical form chronology encoded in the reviewed lexical graph.

AUDIT RECORD ↗
500 BCE–200 CErange
ROUTE STAGEProto-Germanic linguistic horizon

hatizōn

*hatiz- noun family

The inherited noun family is reconstructed from attested Germanic comparanda. No archaeological point, single tribe, or attested Proto-Germanic denominative *hatizōn is asserted.

1 EVIDENCE LINK

A conventional comparative-linguistic interval, not a directly dated token.

AUDIT RECORD ↗
500 BCE–200 CErange
ROUTE STAGEProto-Germanic linguistic horizon

hazzōn

*xatēnan ~ *xatōjanan beside *hatiz-

Comparative Germanic forms support a weak-verb family beside the hate noun base while exact formation, ablaut, and semantic direction remain analytical.

2 EVIDENCE LINKS

A comparative-linguistic interval, not a directly dated token.

AUDIT RECORD ↗
500 BCE–200 CErange
CANONICAL FORMProto-Germanic

*wardaz

Proto-Germanic

guard; guardian

2 EVIDENCE LINKS

Canonical form chronology encoded in the reviewed lexical graph.

AUDIT RECORD ↗
500 BCE–200 CErange
ROUTE STAGEProto-Germanic linguistic horizon

fīunt

*fi(j)ēn- and lexicalized *fi(j)and-

Cross-branch evidence places the hate verb and enemy-agent formation before the separate written Germanic traditions.

2 EVIDENCE LINKS

Comparative bounds, not a directly dated spoken token or single coordinate.

AUDIT RECORD ↗
500 BCE–200 CErange
CANONICAL FORMProto-Germanic

*dīg-

Proto-Germanic

to knead or form

2 EVIDENCE LINKS

Canonical form chronology encoded in the reviewed lexical graph.

AUDIT RECORD ↗
500 BCE–200 CErange
ROUTE STAGEProto-Germanic linguistic horizon

hatōn

*xatēnan ~ *xatōjanan beside *hatiz-

Cross-Germanic daughter evidence supports the family while reconstruction notation and semantic priority remain unsettled.

2 EVIDENCE LINKS

Comparative bounds, not a directly dated spoken token or single coordinate.

AUDIT RECORD ↗
500 BCE–200 CErange
CANONICAL FORMProto-Germanic

*hlaibaz

Proto-Germanic

loaf of bread

2 EVIDENCE LINKS

Canonical form chronology encoded in the reviewed lexical graph.

AUDIT RECORD ↗
500 BCE–200 CErange
ROUTE STAGEProto-Germanic linguistic horizon

heti

*hatiz- and competing inherited stem analyses

Cross-Germanic daughter evidence supports the family while the i-stem and es/os-stem descriptions remain visibly distinct.

3 EVIDENCE LINKS

Comparative bounds, not a directly dated spoken token or single coordinate.

AUDIT RECORD ↗
500 BCE–200 CErange
ROUTE STAGEProto-Germanic linguistic horizon

hōti

competing *hwōtja- and *hatiz- parent analyses

Cross-source disagreement begins before the Old Saxon record: one source reconstructs a threat-related adjective, another classifies the form with hate.

2 EVIDENCE LINKS

Comparative bounds, not a directly dated spoken form or exact homeland.

AUDIT RECORD ↗
500 BCE–200 CErange
CANONICAL FORMProto-Germanic

*gumōn-

Proto-Germanic

man; human being

2 EVIDENCE LINKS

Canonical form chronology encoded in the reviewed lexical graph.

AUDIT RECORD ↗
500 BCE–200 CErange
ROUTE STAGEProto-Germanic linguistic horizon

friend

*frī-

The like, love, or friendly base is reconstructed from daughter-language evidence; no Proto-Germanic speaker, homeland point, or manuscript token is claimed.

2 EVIDENCE LINKS

A comparative-linguistic interval, not a directly dated word.

AUDIT RECORD ↗
500 BCE–200 CErange
ROUTE STAGEGermanic participial-formation horizon

friend

*frijōnd-

The loving-one agent formation predates the daughter-language records, but its exact lexicalization moment and inflectional shape remain reconstructed.

2 EVIDENCE LINKS

The same broad language horizon does not imply an exact coinage date.

AUDIT RECORD ↗
500 BCE–200 CErange
CANONICAL FORMProto-Germanic

*daigaz

Proto-Germanic

dough

3 EVIDENCE LINKS

Canonical form chronology encoded in the reviewed lexical graph.

AUDIT RECORD ↗
500 BCE–200 CErange
ROUTE STAGEProto-Germanic lexical horizon

Freund

*frī-

The love or favor base is reconstructed from daughter-language evidence; no single homeland point or recorded token is claimed.

1 EVIDENCE LINK

A comparative-linguistic interval.

AUDIT RECORD ↗
500 BCE–200 CErange
ROUTE STAGEGermanic participial-formation horizon

Freund

*frijōnd-

The loving-agent noun predates the daughter-language records, but its exact lexicalization moment remains reconstructed.

1 EVIDENCE LINK

The broad horizon does not imply an exact coinage date.

AUDIT RECORD ↗
500 BCE–200 CErange
ROUTE STAGEProto-Germanic lexical horizon

vriend

*frī-

The love or favor base is reconstructed from daughter-language evidence and is not pinned to one location.

1 EVIDENCE LINK

A comparative-linguistic interval.

AUDIT RECORD ↗
500 BCE–200 CErange
ROUTE STAGEGermanic participial-formation horizon

vriend

*frijōnd-

The loving-agent formation predates Old Dutch; no exact coinage event survives.

1 EVIDENCE LINK

A reconstruction horizon, not direct attestation.

AUDIT RECORD ↗
500 BCE–200 CErange
ROUTE STAGEProto-Germanic linguistic horizon

frændi

*frī-

The like, love, or friendly base is reconstructed from daughter-language evidence; no Proto-Germanic speaker, homeland point, or written occurrence is claimed.

2 EVIDENCE LINKS

A comparative-linguistic interval, not a directly dated word.

AUDIT RECORD ↗
500 BCE–200 CErange
ROUTE STAGEGermanic participial-formation horizon

frændi

*frijōnd-

The loving-agent formation predates the daughter-language records, but its exact lexicalization moment and full paradigm remain reconstructed.

2 EVIDENCE LINKS

The broad horizon does not imply an exact coinage date.

AUDIT RECORD ↗
500 BCE–200 CErange
ROUTE STAGEProto-Germanic linguistic horizon

frēond

*frī-

The like, love, or friendly base is reconstructed from daughter-language evidence. No Proto-Germanic speaker, homeland point, or written occurrence is claimed.

2 EVIDENCE LINKS

A comparative-linguistic interval, not a directly dated word.

AUDIT RECORD ↗
500 BCE–200 CErange
ROUTE STAGEGermanic participial-formation horizon

frēond

*frijōnd-

The loving-agent formation predates the daughter-language records, but its exact lexicalization moment and full paradigm remain reconstructed.

2 EVIDENCE LINKS

The shared horizon does not imply an exact coinage date.

AUDIT RECORD ↗
500 BCE–200 CErange
CANONICAL FORMProto-Germanic

*daigjōn-

Proto-Germanic

female baker or servant

3 EVIDENCE LINKS

Canonical form chronology encoded in the reviewed lexical graph.

AUDIT RECORD ↗
500 BCE–200 CErange
CANONICAL FORMProto-Germanic

*daiga-

Proto-Germanic stem

dough; kneaded mass

3 EVIDENCE LINKS

Canonical form chronology encoded in the reviewed lexical graph.

AUDIT RECORD ↗
500 BCE–200 CErange
CANONICAL FORMProto-Germanic

*kuninga-

Proto-Germanic

king; lineage-member title formation

8 EVIDENCE LINKS

Canonical form chronology encoded in the reviewed lexical graph.

AUDIT RECORD ↗
500 BCE–200 CErange
CANONICAL FORMProto-Germanic

*kunja-

Proto-Germanic

lineage, family, kin, descent, or people

10 EVIDENCE LINKS

Canonical form chronology encoded in the reviewed lexical graph.

AUDIT RECORD ↗
500 BCE–200 CErange
CANONICAL FORMProto-Germanic

*-inga- / *-unga-

Proto-Germanic

person associated with or belonging to a lineage

2 EVIDENCE LINKS

Canonical form chronology encoded in the reviewed lexical graph.

AUDIT RECORD ↗
500 BCE–200 CErange
CANONICAL FORMProto-Germanic

*kundjaz

Proto-Germanic

origin, birth, family, race, or kind

4 EVIDENCE LINKS

Canonical form chronology encoded in the reviewed lexical graph.

AUDIT RECORD ↗
500 BCE–200 CErange
CANONICAL FORMProto-Germanic

*kundiz

Proto-Germanic

natural, native, or fitting

4 EVIDENCE LINKS

Canonical form chronology encoded in the reviewed lexical graph.

AUDIT RECORD ↗
02 / WHAT STAYS OUT

UNBOUNDED IS
A REAL RESULT.

Stages without source-backed numeric bounds stay in their complete Journey Atlas route, carry an explicit temporal note, and remain absent here until the evidence supports normalization. The missing point is visible work—not permission to guess.

INSPECT ALL JOURNEYS ↗EXPORT TIMELINE EVENTS ↗