*SET-U

GRAPH-WIDE SEARCH

MEASURE THE GRAPH ↗

NOT JUST A DICTIONARY LOOKUP

6 EVIDENCE COLLECTIONS

SEARCH
THE GRAPH.

Find a modern word—or search sideways through reconstructed roots, historical forms, meanings, languages, scholars, sources, claims, disputes, and witnesses.

WIKTIONARY VIA KAIKKI / WIKTEXTRACT

Imported dictionary evidence

SOURCE-IMPORTED · UNREVIEWED

These are source reports, not reviewed *SET-U ancestry. A list of templates or numbered etymologies is not an ancestor chain. Scholarly disagreements remain in the original source text.

35,981 English word records · 45,491 etymology sections in this online subset

PARTIAL ENGLISH COVERAGE · FULL CORPUS REMAINS LOCAL

3 source sections across 2 headwords matching “Nor”. These are separate from the reviewed results below.

Open the permanent entry for NOR →Open the permanent entry for nor →
NOREnglish (en) · Unnumbered etymologySource text

From nor. Reinterpreted as NOT + OR or negation + OR (see also NAND, formed analogically).

Original Wiktionary entry and references ↗
norEnglish (en) · Etymology 1Source text

Contraction of Middle English nauther, from nother. Cognate with neither. By surface analysis, not + or.

Original Wiktionary entry and references ↗
norEnglish (en) · Etymology 2Source text

From Etymology 1 (sense 2 above), reinterpreted as not + or or negation + or.

Original Wiktionary entry and references ↗

From Wiktionary contributors; extracted by Tatu Ylonen / Wiktextract / Kaikki.org. Extraction source · CC-BY-SA-4.0. Selected source text is reformatted for display; language and section identity are retained.

Source dump: 2026-10-01 · Extraction: 2026-10-30. These dates identify a dump snapshot, not an individual page revision.

Snapshot checksums and coverage
SOURCE SHA-256
5ff2c072f8099f2d2ce484bd6957bf179f046d2ad37bc36555edf8bb84cb5291
CORPUS SHA-256
c4c2a77325141846709230e11c2959332acd630d53e52905b72d36211251b081
IMPORT RUN
73216b9a9b78ed3830994bf853103716f5a4dc57099e371e9f8fdc468facca26
SUBSET SELECTION
English-only: shortest normalized query first, then binary lexical order; complete word-language and case-variant groups only. This is a bounded online subset, not the full acquired corpus.

INDEPENDENT SOURCE LIBRARY

More sources for this spelling

These are spelling matches, not a claim of identical senses or agreement. Historical accounts retain their own editions and limits; none is automatically promoted into reviewed ancestry.

Browse the independently attributed sources →
72REVIEWED RESULTS
12WORD DOSSIERS
12HISTORICAL NODES
12SOURCES
24CLAIMS
12WITNESSES
01

MODERN ENTRY POINTS

WORD DOSSIERS

12
onomastic compound elementdossier summary

-rīx

An attested Gaulish second member meaning “king” or “prince,” visible in compound personal names such as Dumnorix and Vercingetorix and inherited from Proto-Celtic *rīx-s.

OPEN THE FULL LINEAGE ↗
German masculine noundossier summary

Feind

The modern German noun for a personal, political, military, or ideological enemy or opponent. Duden derives it through Middle High German vīnt or vīant and Old High German fīand, literally the hating one; DWDS dates Old High German fīant and fījant to the eighth century and identifies the Germanic ancestor as a petrified substantivized present participle. Grimm’s dictionary independently compares Gothic fijands, Old English fēond, English fiend, Dutch vijand, and Nordic forms, while warning that its own still-deeper foam hypothesis required confirmation. The reviewed route therefore follows the inherited enemy noun to reconstructed *fi(j)and- and *fi(j)ēn-, then treats *peh₁- as proposed and stops.

OPEN THE FULL LINEAGE ↗
German masculine noundossier summary

Hass

The modern German noun for intense aversion, rejection, or hostility toward a person, group, or institution. Duden traces Middle and Old High German haʒ to suffering, sorrow, and resentment and records the 1996 spelling change from Haß to Hass. DWDS/Pfeifer reports the Old High German noun from the eighth century and places it in the Germanic family of Old Saxon heti, Old English hete, Old Norse hatr, Gothic hatis, and related forms. Grimm’s DWB preserves a more complicated semantic record: hostile pursuit or action, anger expressed in deeds, ordinary hostile disposition, and even measured rivalry during friendly competition. The reviewed route reuses *hatiz- and the qualified *ḱh₂d-es- / *ḱeh₂d- comparison, then stops.

OPEN THE FULL LINEAGE ↗
noun · verbcontrarian claim

boomerang

An Aboriginal Australian borrowing recorded in English by 1824. Dharug and Dharawal forms have been proposed, but the Australian National Dictionary Centre says the exact source language remains uncertain.

OPEN THE FULL LINEAGE ↗
nouncontrarian claim

chá

The Portuguese word for tea, a European cha-type form associated with sixteenth-century Portuguese contact through Macao rather than the Dutch te-type route.

OPEN THE FULL LINEAGE ↗
noundossier summary

etymon

A technical English noun for an earlier source form, a foreign donor, or a base used in composition or derivation.

OPEN THE FULL LINEAGE ↗
Swedish common-gender noundossier summary

fiende

The ordinary Swedish noun for an enemy, opponent, hostile state, or figurative threat continues Old Swedish fiande or fiände and an inherited Germanic present-participial formation: literally the hating one. Svenska Akademiens current dictionary calls the word Common Germanic and gives the original force hatande; SAOB and Hellquist independently derive the noun from the fi(j)- hate verb behind Gothic fijan and Old Norse fjá. Modern Swedish hata belongs to a separate Germanic hat- family, so fiende is not transparently built from the verb Swedish speakers now use for hate. Historical Swedish also used Fienden for the Devil, but that branch is not the word’s only or current central meaning. All medieval and early-modern examples here are source-reported lexical records, not directly inspected manuscript objects.

OPEN THE FULL LINEAGE ↗
Gothic class-III weak-verb lemmadossier summary

fijan

A Gothic class-III weak verb conventionally glossed hate or detest. Project Wulfila currently exposes 42 candidate tokens under fijan: 13 verified, eight further lexically unambiguous, and 21 explicitly ambiguous with the masculine nd-stem noun fijands, enemy. The surface inventory contains fifteen written shapes, including one exact infinitive fijan in John 7:7 and four j-less forms. Ayora Estevan shows why the overlap cannot be normalized away: Proto-Germanic had already lexicalized *fi(j)and- as enemy, while Gothic still used the matching present-participial formation for one who hates.

OPEN THE FULL LINEAGE ↗
Danish common-gender noundossier summary

fjende

Modern Danish fjende is the ordinary noun for a person, state, force, ideological opponent, or figurative thing that harms something else. Den Danske Ordbog derives it from Old Norse fjándi, compares German Feind, and identifies the older formation as a present participle of a verb corresponding to Old Norse fjá, to hate or persecute. Gammeldansk Ordbog records fiende broadly from 1100–1300. Ordbog over det danske Sprog preserves fiende, finde, and related spellings, an ordinary enemy sense, military and animal uses, abstract threats, and a special religious Devil branch. Holbergordbog shows that Fiende could still scan as either three syllables or two, alongside Fiænde, Finde, Fînde, and clipped Fiend. The word is therefore a grammatical fossil, not a current psychological definition: a lexicalized one-who-hates became the ordinary Danish enemy noun and accumulated broad contextual work. The current pronunciations are dictionary records, not retrojections into medieval Danish. No manuscript or print object is claimed as directly inspected.

OPEN THE FULL LINEAGE ↗
Old Norse verbcontrarian claim

fjá

Old Norse fjá was a verb meaning to hate. The Dictionary of Old Norse Prose classifies it as poetic and exposes zero prose citations; its glossarium links point to the early form fía and the reconstructed Proto-Germanic *fi(j)ēn-. Cleasby and Vigfússon call the verb obsolete, compare Gothic fijan and Old English feon or fjan, and locate it in Hýmiskviða 22 and Lokasenna 35, with the reflexive fjásk in Skírnismál 33. Fritzner independently gives the same three locations. The normalized verse texts preserve three different grammatical surfaces: goð fjá in Hýmiskviða, mangi fíár in Lokasenna, and Freyr fiásk in Skírnismál. Lexicon Poeticum likewise reports three poetic records, but explicitly warns that its concordance is unreviewed and that dates should be checked. These are source-reported lexical and edited-text records, not directly inspected manuscript objects, and three records in the reviewed poetic concordance are not a census of every Old Norse utterance. The finite verb became a tiny poetic fossil while its inherited participial relative fjándi became the ordinary enemy noun and accumulated 222 citations in ONP's prose corpus. Those corpus totals are not directly frequency-comparable, but the contrast makes the grammatical survival visible. The generated possible runic inscription shown by modern dictionary transcriptions is not historical evidence and is excluded. No historical sound recording exists, so the dossier does not fabricate one exact pronunciation.

OPEN THE FULL LINEAGE ↗
Old Norse masculine nouncontrarian claim

fjándi

Old Norse fjándi is a masculine noun whose inherited shape still exposes a prehistoric agent formation. Cleasby and Vigfússon compare Gothic fiands, Old English feond, German Feind, Swedish fiende, and Danish fjende, identify the nd as participial, and gloss the older formation as properly a hater. They then distinguish the ordinary enemy sense from a post-Christian fiend development. The University of Copenhagen Dictionary of Old Norse Prose supplies 222 citations and six semantic zones: enemy or opponent; devil, monster, or demon; evil spirit; pagan god; the Devil or Satan; and a derogatory term for a hated or bewitched person, animal, or object. Lexicon Poeticum independently exposes 49 poetic records, including source-reported tenth-century enemy uses and later Christian fiend uses, while warning that its concordance and dates require checking. The noun therefore does not possess one timeless true meaning: an inherited lexicalized hater became an ordinary enemy word, and the branch later accumulated several demonic and derogatory senses. The displayed pronunciation is an editorial normalized approximation, not recorded historical audio. No underlying manuscript object is claimed as directly inspected in this dossier.

OPEN THE FULL LINEAGE ↗
English common noun and historical adjectivedossier summary

friend

English friend continues Middle English frẹ̄nd and Old English frēond, an inherited Germanic nd-stem agent noun. OED identifies cognates across West, East, and North Germanic and analyzes them as noun uses of a present participle of the Germanic base behind free; Bosworth–Toller explicitly calls Old English freónd the participle of freón, a verb meaning free or love; American Heritage independently explains the formation as originally one who loves. The historical noun later covers intimate companion, ally, supporter, relation, lover, form of address, Quaker, climbing device, and social-network contact. The graph displays a normalized *frijōnd- participial formation, Germanic *frī-, the proposed Indo-European comparison *prī-, and then stops.

OPEN THE FULL LINEAGE ↗
02

ATTESTED / RECONSTRUCTED / BOUNDARY

HISTORICAL FORMS

12
●
Old Norse / Indo-European

bōndi

householder; dweller

DATE
Old Norse
MATCH
language
DOSSIERS
1
●
Old Norse / Indo-European

būa

to dwell; inhabit; prepare

DATE
Old Norse
MATCH
language
DOSSIERS
1
●
Present-Day English / Indo-European

etymon

an earlier source form, foreign donor, or derivational base

DATE
1573–today
MATCH
gloss
DOSSIERS
1
●
Old Norse / Indo-European

fjá

to hate; in the reflexive, to hate someone

DATE
Old Norse poetic record; exact composition dates not fixed here
MATCH
language
DOSSIERS
1
●
Old Norse / Indo-European

fjándi

enemy or opponent; devil, demon, evil spirit, pagan god, Satan, or a derogatory hated being or thing

DATE
Old Norse poetic and prose record
MATCH
language
DOSSIERS
1
●
Old Norse / Indo-European

frændi

friend or companion; especially kinsman, relative, son, parent, or ancestor

DATE
Old Norse poetic and prose record
MATCH
language
DOSSIERS
1
●
Old Norse / Indo-European

fía

to hate

DATE
early Old Norse form reported by Zoëga and referenced by ONP
MATCH
language
DOSSIERS
1
●
Old Norse / Indo-European

hata

to persecute; reject or despise; humiliate; hate; damage or destroy in poetic use; become or remain hostile in reflexive constructions

DATE
Old Norse prose and poetic record
MATCH
language
DOSSIERS
1
●
Old Norse / Indo-European

hatr

hatred, enmity, spite; perhaps mockery or scorn in one uncertain context

DATE
Old Norse textual record
MATCH
language
DOSSIERS
1
●
Old Norse / Indo-European

hūs

house

DATE
Old Norse
MATCH
language
DOSSIERS
0
●
Old Norse / Indo-European

hūsbōndi

householder; master of a house

DATE
Old Norse
MATCH
language
DOSSIERS
1
●
Old Norse / Indo-European

lǫg / lög; lag

law; a laying, layer, order, or disposition

DATE
Old Norse
MATCH
language
DOSSIERS
1
03

WHERE INTERPRETATION IS TESTED

CLAIMS & DISPUTES

24

SCHOLARLY DISPUTES / 12

openprobableposition text

Was the relative sense inherited or independently strengthened in Germanic branches?

The sources establish the sense across German and Nordic evidence but do not recover one complete prehistoric semantic tree.

openprobableposition text

What is the earliest surviving use of cais in either sense?

Not established here. eDIL supplies located citations but the underlying objects and dates were not normalized or directly inspected for an earliest-use audit.

openprobableposition text

Did English chai come from one identifiable donor language?

The modern culinary sense strongly points toward South Asian usage, but Merriam-Webster lists Turkish, Russian, Persian, Hindi, and Urdu source forms without selecting one unique donor.

openprobableposition text

Exactly which Romance language handed the word to English?

French and Italian stages are both central in reference accounts; a single linear donor route can overstate the surviving evidence.

openprobableposition text

Can the exact Proto-Germanic pronunciation and lexicalization moment be recovered?

No. *fi(j)and- and *fi(j)ēn- are normalized comparative reconstructions; optional j, branch vowels, and the timing of lexicalization remain analytical.

openprobableposition text

Are there exactly three surviving Old Norse uses?

Three is the count in the reviewed public Lexicon Poeticum surface and matches the three locations in Cleasby and Fritzner, but it is not presented as a census of every lost or surviving utterance.

openprobableposition text

Can the exact pronunciation and path into fjá be recovered?

Not completely. Vowel quantity, optional glide, contraction, surface variation, and poetic normalization belong to historical analysis rather than recorded audio.

openprobableposition text

Can the exact Proto-Germanic pronunciation and lexicalization moment be recovered?

No. *fi(j)and- and *fi(j)ēn- are normalized comparative reconstructions; optional j, branch vowels, and the moment the agent became an ordinary noun remain analytical.

openprobableposition text

Can the exact Old Norse pronunciation be heard or uniquely recovered?

No. The displayed IPA is a normalized scholarly approximation; manuscript spelling and comparative phonology cannot reproduce one recorded medieval voice.

openprobableposition text

Did friend or kin come first semantically?

The inherited agent formation and daughter-language distributions do not recover one securely dated semantic split. Old Norse evidence preserves overlap rather than a single transition record.

openprobableposition text

Can the exact pronunciation of frēond be heard or uniquely recovered?

No. The displayed IPA is a normalized scholarly approximation across written dialect evidence, not one recorded Old English voice.

openprobableposition text

Can the exact Proto-Germanic pronunciation and lexicalization moment be recovered?

No. *fi(j)and- and *fi(j)ēn- are normalized comparative reconstructions; optional j, branch vowels, and the moment the agent became an ordinary noun remain analytical.

CONTRARIAN TRUTHS / 12

RANK 7GRADE Acontrarian claim

Nice crossed from ignorance to approval.

Latin nescius “ignorant” became foolish or wanton, then fastidious and precise, and finally pleasant or kind.

RANK 18GRADE Aranked reveal

The famous Gaulish ending is -rīx, not decorative -ix.

Cambridge identifies Gaulish -rix /-rīxs/ “king” inside Dumnorix and Vercingetorix and derives it from Proto-Celtic *rīx-s. The r belongs to the historical element; the exact force of that element still varies across individual names.

RANK 24GRADE Acontrarian claim

Hatred is medieval—and its -red means neither red nor “more.”

Middle English assembled hate with a dying native element for a state or condition. The compound is younger than its parts; below the secure Germanic hate family, even the celebrated PIE root remains a qualified and semantically difficult proposal.

RANK 39GRADE Acontrarian claim

Old Norse fjándi was an enemy before it was the Devil.

Cleasby and Vigfússon identify the inherited -nd- shape as participial and gloss the older formation as properly a hater. Their first sense is the ordinary enemy; only after the introduction of Christianity does the historical account assign fjándi the fiend branch. ONP then reveals how far the word traveled: 222 citations across enemy, demon, evil spirit, pagan god, Satan, and derogatory uses for hated or bewitched beings and things. The truth is not that every enemy secretly hates. It is that a lexicalized agent noun became an ordinary social category, then accumulated new religious and expressive work.

RANK 40GRADE Aranked reveal

Modern Danish kept the enemy but lost the hate verb inside its grammar.

DDO identifies fjende as historically a present participle of a verb corresponding to Old Norse fjá, to hate or persecute. Old Danish fiende then survives through a remarkable surface cloud: Fiende, Fiænde, Finde, Fînde, clipped Fiend, and both two- and three-syllable scans. The current noun no longer means that every enemy literally feels hate; it names active opposition and extends to states, ideologies, animals, weather, and abstractions. The grammatical fossil unveils a history, not a timeless essence.

RANK 42GRADE Acontrarian claim

The ordinary Old Norse enemy outlived the finite hate verb behind it.

ONP classifies fjá as poetic and exposes no prose citations. Cleasby, Fritzner, and Lexicon Poeticum converge on three Eddic contexts, while normalized texts preserve active fjá, finite fíár, and reflexive fiásk. Cleasby then points to fjándi as the participial relative that remained across Germanic. ONP gives that separate enemy noun 222 prose citations and a large semantic range. The two corpus totals are not directly frequency-comparable, and neither proves an exact extinction event; together they reveal the asymmetry between a tiny finite-verb record and the prolific lexicalized enemy branch.

RANK 43GRADE Acontrarian claim

Old Norse hate was action, contempt, humiliation, and feeling inside one verb.

ONP's 101-citation prose article orders four active senses before its participial and reciprocal branches: persecute; despise, reject, or cast aside; mock or humiliate; and hate, despise, or stand hostile. Fritzner independently moves from pursuit and destruction to ordinary hate. A c1200 manuscript leaf visibly writes hata in a command to love chastity and hate no person. The article's sense order is not a chronology, and the poetic concordance is explicitly unreviewed; the reveal is the documented semantic range, not an invented first essence.

RANK 45GRADE Aranked reveal

One Gothic anger verb survives in one question—and not in its dictionary form.

Project Wulfila’s complete current inventory contains one hatizōn token: hatizoþ in John 7:23, “are you angry at me?” Codex Argenteus folio 94v directly preserves the inflection. The manuscript never writes the normalized infinitive or its editorial macron. Grammar then reveals another layer: hatizōn is a class-II verb built from the consonantal stem hatiz- of hatis “hatred” or “wrath.” One English gloss therefore hides a noun-to-verb formation, one surviving grammatical person, and a sharp boundary between pixels and reconstruction.

RANK 46GRADE Aranked reveal

Old High German hazzōn is a paradigm fault line, not proof that hate originally meant pursue.

The clean dictionary headword conceals paired ēn and ōn forms: Starling reports hazzēn in the eighth century and hazzōn in the ninth, Duden prints haʒʒēn and haʒʒōn, and the UT reflex index also records hazēn and hazōn. Corpus-wide research confirms that Old High German ēn verbs can show ōn double forms. DWB reports aemulari and insequi alignments that support emulation, following, or hostile pursuit—but Pokorny’s comparative warning is exact: Germanic evidence does not prove that pursue was the root’s basic meaning. The normalized form, the source-reported tokens, the paradigm analysis, and the prehistoric semantic claim are four different evidence layers.

RANK 55GRADE Acontrarian claim

frændi is friend’s cognate—but kinship became its Old Norse center.

The Germanic family did not carry one frozen dictionary definition into every daughter language. OED places Old Icelandic frændi beside English friend; Cleasby–Vigfússon and Fritzner preserve the old participial analysis; ONP then exposes what happened in use. Its 225 citations distinguish friend, foster brother or companion, kinsman or son, parents, and ancestor, with no sharp wall between friend and kin. The unveiling is semantic divergence backed by a shared graph: English centers chosen companion, while the Scandinavian cognate centers family without ceasing to be cognate.

RANK 59GRADE A-contrarian claim

Old Norse hatr has a 54-to-1 grammar problem.

The University of Copenhagen’s Dictionary of Old Norse Prose separates a 54-citation neuter noun from a one-citation masculine analysis—and flags the lone masculine assignment as possibly an elementary error. A directly inspected c.1150-1200 manuscript visibly preserves Hatr, but a visible token cannot settle gender by itself. The reveal is not that Old Norse had two equally secure hate nouns; it is that rigorous lexicography preserves the fracture instead of hiding it.

RANK 61GRADE Acontrarian claim

Its most famous behavior is not universal—and even its exact donor language is unsettled.

Many hunting and fighting boomerangs do not return. Dharug and Dharawal sources have been proposed, while ANU keeps the exact language unresolved.

04

BOOKS / DICTIONARIES / ARTICLES / DATABASES

SOURCES

12
historical dictionary35 CLAIM LINKS

Bosworth–Toller Anglo-Saxon Dictionary — FEÓGAN

Joseph Bosworth · Thomas Northcote Toller · Christ Sean · Ondřej Tichý / 2014

author or editorAUDIT EVERY USE ↗
historical dictionary26 CLAIM LINKS

An Anglo-Saxon Dictionary Online — feónd

Joseph Bosworth · Thomas Northcote Toller · Christ Sean · Ondřej Tichy / 2014

author or editorAUDIT EVERY USE ↗
historical dictionary22 CLAIM LINKS

Dictionary of Old Norse Prose — fjándi, masculine noun

Dictionary of Old Norse Prose editors / 2010

author or editorAUDIT EVERY USE ↗
historical dictionary21 CLAIM LINKS

An Icelandic-English Dictionary — fjándi

Richard Cleasby · Guðbrandur Vigfússon / 1874

publisherAUDIT EVERY USE ↗
historical dictionary20 CLAIM LINKS

An Icelandic-English Dictionary — FRÆNDI

Richard Cleasby · Guðbrandur Vigfússon / 1874

publisherAUDIT EVERY USE ↗
historical dictionary20 CLAIM LINKS

Dictionary of Old Norse Prose — frǽndi, masculine noun

Dictionary of Old Norse Prose editors / 2010

author or editorAUDIT EVERY USE ↗
historical dictionary19 CLAIM LINKS

An Anglo-Saxon Dictionary Online — freónd

Joseph Bosworth · Thomas Northcote Toller · Christ Sean · Ondřej Tichy / 2014

author or editorAUDIT EVERY USE ↗
historical dictionary13 CLAIM LINKS

HETTAN; HETTEND — An Anglo-Saxon Dictionary, Dictionary H

Joseph Bosworth · Thomas Northcote Toller · Jonathan Slocum / 1898

author or editorAUDIT EVERY USE ↗
historical dictionary12 CLAIM LINKS

HATIAN — An Anglo-Saxon Dictionary, Dictionary H

Joseph Bosworth · Thomas Northcote Toller · Jonathan Slocum / 1898

author or editorAUDIT EVERY USE ↗
historical dictionary12 CLAIM LINKS

HETE — An Anglo-Saxon Dictionary Online

Joseph Bosworth · Thomas Northcote Toller · Christ Sean · Ondřej Tichý / 2014

author or editorAUDIT EVERY USE ↗
historical dictionary10 CLAIM LINKS

Dictionary of Old Norse Prose — fjá, poetic verb

Dictionary of Old Norse Prose editors / 2010

author or editorAUDIT EVERY USE ↗
historical dictionary10 CLAIM LINKS

Dictionary of Old Norse Prose — hata, verb

Dictionary of Old Norse Prose editors / 2023

author or editorAUDIT EVERY USE ↗
05

FIRST USES & HISTORICAL OBJECTS

ATTESTATION WITNESSES

12
DIRECTLY INSPECTEDprinted book

The first edition of the Académie française dictionary prints HOSTEL as a headword in the historical French family later normalized as hôtel.

hôtel / hotel / 1694

Le dictionnaire de l'Académie française. Tome 1 (A–L), première éditionreporting source / OPEN RECORD ↗
DIRECTLY INSPECTEDprinted book

A tide passage in John Harris’s Lexicon technicum uses check as a verb meaning restrain or impede.

check / check / 1704

Lexicon technicum: or, an universal English dictionary of arts and scienceswitness excerpt / OPEN RECORD ↗
SOURCE REPORTEDlexical corpus record

Icelandic homily, Adam as ancestor

frændi / frændi / manuscript dated circa 1200 by ONP

Dictionary of Old Norse Prose — frǽndi, masculine nounreporting source / OPEN RECORD ↗
SOURCE REPORTEDlexical corpus record

Spakmǽli Prospers: Epigrammata

hatr / hatr / c.1200-1225, source-reported

Dictionary of Old Norse Prose citation — proposed mockery or scorn sense of hatrreporting source / OPEN RECORD ↗
SOURCE REPORTEDlexical corpus record

Snorri Sturluson, Háttatal 19

hata / hata / poem attributed 1221; concordance date unreviewed

Lexicon Poeticum — hata, verbreporting source / OPEN RECORD ↗
SOURCE REPORTEDlexical corpus record

Grágás, friends-or-kin versus enemies formula

frændi / frændi / manuscript dated circa 1250 by ONP

Dictionary of Old Norse Prose — frǽndi, masculine nounreporting source / OPEN RECORD ↗
SOURCE REPORTEDlexical corpus record

Morkinskinna, friends becoming enemies

frændi / frændi / manuscript dated circa 1275 by ONP

Dictionary of Old Norse Prose — frǽndi, masculine nounreporting source / OPEN RECORD ↗
SOURCE REPORTEDlexical corpus record

Hirðskrá manuscript record

hatr / hatr / c.1300, source-reported

Dictionary of Old Norse Prose — ¹hatr, masculine analysisreporting source / OPEN RECORD ↗
SOURCE REPORTEDlexical corpus record

Árni’s Christian law, GKS 3270 4° variant

fjándi / fjándi / manuscript dated circa 1350 by ONP

Dictionary of Old Norse Prose citation — fjándi in ÁKr 22reporting source / OPEN RECORD ↗
SOURCE REPORTEDlexical corpus record

Dumnorix in Caesar’s De Bello Gallico

-rīx / -rīx / first-century BCE work, inspected through a 1914 digital edition

De Bello Gallico — Latin edition in the Scaife Viewerwitness excerpt / OPEN RECORD ↗
SOURCE REPORTEDlexical corpus record

Definition-like account of hatr

hatr / hatr / Old Norse prose corpus, source-reported

Dictionary of Old Norse Prose — ²hatr, neuter nounreporting source / OPEN RECORD ↗
SOURCE REPORTEDlexical corpus record

Love-and-hate temporal opposition

hatr / hatr / Old Norse prose corpus, source-reported

Dictionary of Old Norse Prose — ²hatr, neuter nounreporting source / OPEN RECORD ↗
06

SEARCH IS DISCOVERY, NOT PROOF

EVERY RESULT OPENS A PERMANENT EVIDENCE RECORD.

Matching text only locates a record. It does not raise confidence, settle a dispute, establish cognacy, or turn a source report into direct inspection. Follow the result into its citations and editorial limits.