*SET-U

RECURSIVE ANCESTOR EXPLORER

GLOBAL GRAPH ↗

NORTH-STAR FEATURE / ROOT OF THE ROOT

WORD → PARENT → PARENT → UNKNOWN

GO TO
THE ROOT.

Do not stop at the first ancestor. Follow every cited route—through compounds, reconstructions, and disagreements—until human knowledge actually stops.

START / NODE 1148GothicGothic biblical tradition

hatan

A Gothic weak verb conventionally glossed hate, represented by exactly two currently reported corpus tokens: hatandane in Luke 1:71 and hatandans in Luke 6:27. Both are present participles; no surviving token writes the normalized infinitive. Their translation behavior defeats a one-word gloss: Luke 1 uses fijandam for enemies and hatandane for those hating, while Luke 6 uses hatandans for enemies and fijandam for those hating. Project Wulfila keeps class-III hatan separate from class-I hatjan, Braune calls the forms conjugational fluctuation, Orel publishes a reconstructed class-III alternation, and Sturtevant argues that the hatan shape may instead be a specifically Gothic secondary formation.

“Gothic does not map one English hate word to one ancestral verb. Its only two hatan tokens are participles, and across two Luke passages hatan and fijan trade the constructional roles enemies and those who hate.”
OPEN COMPLETE WORD DOSSIER ↗
26CANONICAL NODES
26REVIEWED EDGES
2FIRST PARENT ROUTES
5RECONSTRUCTIONS
19KNOWLEDGE HORIZONS
36EDGE CITATIONS

EVERY REVIEWED PARENT, NOT ONE EDITORIAL PATH

FOLLOW EVERY BRANCH.

Compound components and competing routes stay separate. Every arrow retains its sound change, semantic change, scholar, confidence, and exact sources.

01
PARENT ROUTES2 REVIEWED RELATIONSHIPS
EDGE 1136COMPETING INHERITANCEPROPOSED
*

RECONSTRUCTED, NOT DIRECTLY ATTESTED

SOUND CHANGE
On the inherited analysis, Gothic h and the hat- stem continue the Germanic forms Orel writes with x, while the Gothic class-III paradigm is compared with the reconstructed *xatēnan ~ *xatōjanan alternation.
SEMANTIC CHANGE
The Germanic weak-verb family meaning hate continues in the two surviving Gothic participles, one of which is substantivized as enemies.
SCHOLAR
Vladimir Orel · Project Wulfila editors
CONFIDENCE
proposed — The comparative family is published, but the exact reconstruction varies and Sturtevant argues that Gothic hatan may be a secondary formation beside hatjan rather than a straightforward inherited class-III reflex.
CHRONOLOGY
Proto-Germanic reconstruction into the fourth-century Gothic translation tradition and surviving early-sixth-century manuscript.
EDGE 1141ANALOGICAL INFLUENCEPROPOSED
SOUND CHANGE
Sturtevant analyzes hatan beside hatjan through a specifically Gothic secondary association with the fijan/fian pattern; Braune independently records fluctuation between class III and class I.
SEMANTIC CHANGE
The two Gothic hate paradigms overlap semantically and morphologically without proving that every construction or sense was identical.
SCHOLAR
Albert Morey Sturtevant · Wilhelm Braune
CONFIDENCE
proposed — This is a published internal-Gothic explanation competing with direct inherited class-III analysis, not a claim that attested hatjan is a chronologically older written ancestor.
CHRONOLOGY
Synchronic or post-inherited Gothic remodeling before the surviving sixth-century manuscript.
*

THE ASTERISK IS A PROMISE

RECONSTRUCTION IS
NOT INSCRIPTION.

Crossing into a starred form changes the evidence class. The interface marks that crossing, preserves confidence, and never manufactures the next root to make the picture look complete.