PERMANENT SOURCE RECORD
ALL SOURCES ↗SOURCE
RECORD.
One work. Every claim that depends on it. No citation without a consequence you can inspect.
15 PUBLIC LINKS INTO THE GRAPH.
This count excludes duplicate dossier-path citations. Open the claims below to see exactly how the source is used.
A Gothic Grammar with Selections for Reading and a Glossary — hatan and hatjan
- AUTHOR / EDITOR
- Wilhelm Braune · translated and edited by Gerhard H. Balg
- YEAR
- 1895
- PUBLISHER
- Project Gutenberg edition of the second edition
- DOI
- Not recorded
- SOURCE TYPE
- historical grammar
- EXTERNAL RECORD
- OPEN ORIGINAL ↗
CONTRARIAN TRUTH CLAIMS
RANKED REVEALS THAT CITE THIS SOURCE
One Gothic hate verb survives once—in a command to do good to those who hate you.
Project Wulfila’s only verified hatjan token is hatjandam in Matthew 5:44, directly visible on Codex Argenteus folio 3v. A parallel “love your enemies” command in Luke 6:27 instead uses hatandans from class-III hatan. The translation gloss “hate” therefore hides a genuine grammatical and historical dispute.
*ḱeh₂d- → *ḱh₂d-es- → *hatiz- → *xatjanan → hatjan
§193 note and glossary p. 170Preserves the historical-grammar analysis of conjugational fluctuation.
Gothic’s two hate verbs trade places across two passages.
The complete surviving hatan corpus contains only hatandane in Luke 1:71 and hatandans in Luke 6:27. In Luke 1, fijandam supplies enemies while hatandane supplies those hating; in Luke 6, hatandans supplies enemies while fijandam supplies those hating. Both Codex Argenteus pages are directly inspected. The lexical swap—and the class-III versus class-I dispute—cannot be represented by one timeless translation arrow.
*ḱeh₂d- → *ḱh₂d-es- → *hatiz- → *xatēnan ~ *xatōjanan → hatan
§193 note: hatan fluctuates with class-I hatjanPreserves the paradigm-fluctuation analysis.
SCHOLARLY DISAGREEMENT
DISPUTE POSITIONS THAT CITE THIS SOURCE
Are hatan and hatjan two Gothic verbs or one fluctuating paradigm?
The sources preserve different analytical levels. Project Wulfila gives separate class-III and class-I lemmas; Orel publishes distinct comparative formations. Braune says hatan fluctuates with class-I hatjan, while Sturtevant proposes a specifically Gothic secondary explanation.
§193 note: hatan fluctuates with class-I hatjanTreats the forms as conjugational fluctuation.
Was hatan inherited unchanged from Proto-Germanic?
Possibly, not securely. Orel publishes *xatēnan ~ *xatōjanan behind a Germanic cognate set. Sturtevant instead judges a specifically Gothic secondary origin more probable, and Braune records fluctuation with hatjan.
§193 note: fluctuation between class III and class IPreserves the internal-paradigm account.
How should Ephesians 2:3 hatize and hatis be parsed?
The witnesses disagree in form and the analytical layers disagree in labeling. Project Wulfila’s current morphology lists A hatize as genitive plural and B hatis as nominative or accusative singular; Braune calls B hatis a consonantal genitive beside A hatizē, while Streitberg’s later teaching glossary calls genitive hatis erroneous.
§94 note 5: B hatis as a consonantal genitive beside A hatizēPublishes the historical-grammar treatment of the B form.
How does hatizōn relate to Gothic hatjan and hatan?
The reviewed sources distinguish class-II hatizōn, class-I hatjan, and class-III hatan. Hatis clearly supports two denominatives, while the precise historical relationship among all three verb systems remains disputed.
§193 note and glossary p. 170, hatan and hatjanShows a tighter fluctuation analysis for two parts of the broader system.
Are hatjan and hatan two Gothic verbs or one fluctuating paradigm?
The located scholarship does not collapse to one answer. Project Wulfila gives separate class-I and class-III lemmas; Orel publishes distinct Germanic formations. Braune says hatan fluctuates between class III and class I, and Wright lists both under the same gloss.
§193 note: hatan fluctuates with class-I hatjanTreats the forms as conjugational fluctuation.
Does hatis underlie Gothic hatjan and hatizōn?
Historical grammar derives class-I hatjan from the consonantal stem of hatis, and the University of Texas derivational table builds class-II hatizōn “be angry” directly on hatiz-. The separate class-III hatan remains a wider paradigm and reconstruction problem rather than a proved direct daughter of this noun.
Glossary p. 170, hatjan from the consonantal stem of hatisPublishes the class-I noun-to-verb derivation.
Was hatjan derived from the Germanic hate noun?
Probably. Braune derives the class-I verb from the consonantal stem of hatis, and Orel derives *xatjanan from *xataz ~ *xatez. The exact reconstructed notation is editorial, but the noun-to-verb analysis is independently published.
Glossary p. 170, hatjan derived from the consonantal stem of hatisPublishes the Gothic noun-to-verb derivation.
CANONICAL RELATIONSHIP CLAIMS
EDGES THAT CITE THIS SOURCE
hatjan → *xatjanan
Gothic → Proto-Germanic · inheritance
- SOUND
- The class-I -j- morphology visible in hatjandam supports the normalized infinitive hatjan and corresponds to the reconstructed *-jan- formation; Gothic h continues the Germanic fricative written x in Orel’s notation.
- MEANING
- The surviving Gothic clause means hate. The pursuit sense of Middle High German hetzen is a daughter-branch development and is not projected back as the only Gothic meaning.
- SCHOLAR / EDITOR
- Vladimir Orel · Wilhelm Braune · Project Wulfila editors
§193 note and glossary p. 170, hatjanTreats hatjan as the class-I shape of a verb fluctuating with class-III hatan and derives it from the hatis stem.
hatan → *xatēnan ~ *xatōjanan
Gothic → Proto-Germanic · competing inheritance
- SOUND
- On the inherited analysis, Gothic h and the hat- stem continue the Germanic forms Orel writes with x, while the Gothic class-III paradigm is compared with the reconstructed *xatēnan ~ *xatōjanan alternation.
- MEANING
- The Germanic weak-verb family meaning hate continues in the two surviving Gothic participles, one of which is substantivized as enemies.
- SCHOLAR / EDITOR
- Vladimir Orel · Project Wulfila editors
§§191–193 and note: class-III -ai- distribution; hatan fluctuates with class-I hatjanTreats the Gothic forms as conjugational fluctuation rather than a clean separate inheritance.
hatan → hatjan
Gothic → Gothic · analogical influence
- SOUND
- Sturtevant analyzes hatan beside hatjan through a specifically Gothic secondary association with the fijan/fian pattern; Braune independently records fluctuation between class III and class I.
- MEANING
- The two Gothic hate paradigms overlap semantically and morphologically without proving that every construction or sense was identical.
- SCHOLAR / EDITOR
- Albert Morey Sturtevant · Wilhelm Braune
§193 note: hatan fluctuates between class III and class I hatjanIndependently records the overlapping Gothic paradigm analysis.
LEXICAL ATTESTATIONS
WITNESSES REPORTED BY THIS SOURCE
COMPARATIVE EVIDENCE
COGNATES, DESCENDANTS, AND RELATIVES
hatjan
Gothica class-I weak hate verb derived from the consonantal hatis stem in historical grammar
hatis
Gothicthe related hate or wrath noun from whose consonantal stem the class-I verb is analyzed
fijan
Gothicanother Gothic verb for hate or detest, visible beside the enemy noun in Luke 6:27
GEOGRAPHIC AND TEMPORAL CLAIMS
JOURNEY STAGES THAT CITE THIS SOURCE
NON-GENEALOGICAL CONNECTIONS
HISTORICAL CONTEXT, KEPT SEPARATE
WORD-FAMILY REUSE
DOSSIERS THAT DEPEND ON THIS SOURCE
2 entry-scoped citations map reviewed dossier paths onto the canonical claims above.