820 canonical forms + 578 route stages.
THE TIMELINE ATLAS
JOURNEY ATLAS ↗FORM / ROUTE / BOUND
1398 REVIEWED EVENTSLANGUAGE
IN TIME.
One cross-word chronology for every defensibly bounded form and journey stage—without converting a vague historical label into a fake year.
A reviewed graph bound, not a claim of an earliest human word.
Only stages with directly cited numeric bounds enter this atlas.
Labels remain visible in Journey Atlas, but not parsed into false years.
FILTER THE CHRONOLOGY
WHEN DID THE EVIDENCE LAND?
TWO CLOCKS.
NO FALSE PRECISION.
FORM CHRONOLOGY dates a canonical linguistic form or reconstruction in the lexical graph.
ROUTE CHRONOLOGY dates a geographic or transmission stage in a word’s journey.
They can share an era band, but they are never silently treated as the same kind of claim.
CROSS-WORD CHRONOLOGY / EARLIEST BOUND FIRST
THE EVIDENCE IN TIME
fiend
proposed *peh₁- comparison
A deeper harm, blame, suffering, or hate comparison is published, but its exact formation and semantic unity remain proposed.
A conventional reconstruction interval, not a dated inscription or mappable speech community.
AUDIT RECORD ↗fiende
proposed *peh₁- comparison
Kroonen’s deeper route is a comparative linguistic proposal, not a word located at one excavated place.
A conventional comparative horizon attached to a proposed analysis, not an archaeological finding.
AUDIT RECORD ↗fiend
*fi(j)ēn- and lexicalized *fi(j)and-
Germanic branches preserve both the hate verb and lexicalized present-participial enemy noun. The asterisked forms are comparative reconstructions.
A comparative-linguistic interval rather than an attested spelling date.
AUDIT RECORD ↗fiende
*fi(j)ēn- and *fi(j)and-
The hate verb and lexicalized participial enemy noun are comparative reconstructions shared across Germanic branches.
Comparative bounds, not directly dated spoken tokens or a single geographic point.
AUDIT RECORD ↗fiend
fēond, fīond, fīend, and fȳnd
Dialect and inflection create multiple Old English vowels and plural patterns without creating separate enemy lexemes. Enemy, foe, and Devil uses coexist in the written record.
The political dates bound a broad Old English stage; they do not date the first utterance or every cited manuscript.
AUDIT RECORD ↗Feind
German Feind beside English fiend
German keeps ordinary enemy central; the English cognate foregrounds demon and vicious-person senses. Cognacy does not force identical daughter-language histories.
This is a comparative semantic stage across languages, not a single migration route or coordinate.
AUDIT RECORD ↗fjándi
enemy to fiend and Devil
Historical and corpus dictionaries document the inherited enemy noun’s demonic branches after Christianization without locating one coinage event.
A broad textual-semantic interval, not a first-use point or one movement on a map.
AUDIT RECORD ↗fjende
fiende known since 1100–1300
Gammeldansk Ordbog supplies the broad Danish record without one exposed earliest witness.
fiend
fẹ̄nd, fend, feend, fiend, and extensive variation
The Middle English Dictionary records 188 quotations across eight senses; OED’s forms preserve inherited plurals and regional spellings while enemy, Devil, demon, possession, and monster uses overlap.
A period-level written-record stage, not one place, pronunciation, or standardized form.
AUDIT RECORD ↗fiende
Skåne-Lagen, beginning of the 1300s
SO reports fiende from the beginning of the 1300s in Skåne-Lagen. The title does not by itself justify one manuscript-production coordinate.
A conservative interval for the lexicographic date label, not a token year, coinage date, or directly inspected object.
AUDIT RECORD ↗fiende
Fiande in Söderwall’s medieval dictionary
Söderwall’s located edition excerpts document ordinary enemy and especially Devil uses. Their source worlds are not collapsed into a single map pin.
A language-period range around multiple edited records, not one uniform regional event.
AUDIT RECORD ↗fēond
fend, feend, feinde, and fiend
OED records competing long and short vowel pronunciations and extensive spelling variation before the long vowel becomes dominant by the eighteenth century.
The interval summarizes documented form and pronunciation competition without asserting one universal transition date.
AUDIT RECORD ↗fiend
competing long and short vowels
OED reports both long- and short-vowel pronunciations alongside spelling variation before the long vowel becomes dominant.
A documentary interval for pronunciation competition, not one universal sound-change date.
AUDIT RECORD ↗fiende
fiendhom and fiende, 1521–1665
SAOB records political, biblical, demonic, and figurative uses across early-modern Swedish texts.
A multi-source evidence interval; no single coordinate or innovation site is asserted.
AUDIT RECORD ↗fjándi
Icelandic fjandi, Swedish fiende, and Danish fjende
The inherited noun continues with different branch-specific semantic centers; no daughter language is treated as the original.
A continuation horizon, not a single borrowing, coordinate, or semantic event.
AUDIT RECORD ↗fjende
1695–1742 printed records and form variation
ODS and Holbergordbog expose fienden, Fiende, Fiænde, Finde, Fînde, Fiend, and competing syllable patterns.
fiend
long-vowel pronunciation becomes dominant
OED’s later-development note places the dominance of the long-vowel pronunciation by the eighteenth century.
The source supports century-level dominance, not simultaneous adoption by every speaker.
AUDIT RECORD ↗fēond
modern fiend
The literal enemy or foe sense is obsolete, while Devil, demon, wicked-person, harmful-thing, and later figurative uses continue in English.
fiend
modern fiend
The literal enemy or foe sense is obsolete, while Devil, demon, wicked-person, harmful-thing, and later figurative uses continue in global English.
fiende
current fiende and historical dictionary record
SAOB and SO document continuation into modern Swedish, with ordinary enemy or opponent central and military, collective, and figurative uses available.
Dictionary publication and current-use horizon, not a claim of dialectal uniformity.
AUDIT RECORD ↗UNBOUNDED IS
A REAL RESULT.
Stages without source-backed numeric bounds stay in their complete Journey Atlas route, carry an explicit temporal note, and remain absent here until the evidence supports normalization. The missing point is visible work—not permission to guess.