820 canonical forms + 578 route stages.
THE TIMELINE ATLAS
JOURNEY ATLAS ↗FORM / ROUTE / BOUND
1398 REVIEWED EVENTSLANGUAGE
IN TIME.
One cross-word chronology for every defensibly bounded form and journey stage—without converting a vague historical label into a fake year.
A reviewed graph bound, not a claim of an earliest human word.
Only stages with directly cited numeric bounds enter this atlas.
Labels remain visible in Journey Atlas, but not parsed into false years.
FILTER THE CHRONOLOGY
WHEN DID THE EVIDENCE LAND?
TWO CLOCKS.
NO FALSE PRECISION.
FORM CHRONOLOGY dates a canonical linguistic form or reconstruction in the lexical graph.
ROUTE CHRONOLOGY dates a geographic or transmission stage in a word’s journey.
They can share an era band, but they are never silently treated as the same kind of claim.
CROSS-WORD CHRONOLOGY / EARLIEST BOUND FIRST
THE EVIDENCE IN TIME
etymologize
1650s intransitive horizon
Etymonline reports the intransitive study-or-practice use from the 1650s.
hetzen
hetzen
Standard German preserves chase, hurry, and hostile-agitation senses. A global language community is not reduced to one map pin.
The range marks the Modern German stage rather than uninterrupted evidence for every sense in every year.
AUDIT RECORD ↗Feind
Feind as personal, collective, military, and ideological opponent
Duden documents the contemporary sense range while DWDS keeps the inherited opponent or adversary center visible.
German is pluricentric and geographically distributed, so the modern language is not reduced to one map pin.
AUDIT RECORD ↗hassen
hassen as hatred and strong aversion
Duden separates person-directed hatred from strong aversion toward things and actions; DWDS supplies modern literary usage. The record is linguistic, not one geographic point.
The range models the New High German continuum through the current reviewed dictionaries.
AUDIT RECORD ↗hazzōn
hassen
Modern hassen centers person-directed hatred and strong aversion, while its dictionaries retain the older action history. This stage is linguistic rather than a single point on a map.
The range models New High German continuity through the currently reviewed dictionaries.
AUDIT RECORD ↗hetzen
Modern German
hunt or drive; hurry; incite or stir hostility
hassen
New High German and current German
to feel hatred toward someone; to feel strong aversion toward a person, thing, or action
hatjan
Isaac Vossius and acquisition by De la Gardie
Vossius took the manuscript to Holland; Magnus Gabriel De la Gardie later bought it and presented it to Uppsala University.
The official history names Holland but does not reduce this custody stage to one city or exact transaction year.
AUDIT RECORD ↗hatis
Isaac Vossius and acquisition by De la Gardie
Vossius took the manuscript to Holland; Magnus Gabriel De la Gardie later bought it and presented it to Uppsala University.
The official history names Holland but does not reduce this custody stage to one city or exact transaction year.
AUDIT RECORD ↗hatan
Isaac Vossius and acquisition by De la Gardie
Vossius took the manuscript to Holland; Magnus Gabriel De la Gardie later bought it and presented it to Uppsala University.
The official history names Holland but does not reduce this custody stage to one city or exact transaction year.
AUDIT RECORD ↗fijan
Isaac Vossius and acquisition by De la Gardie
Vossius took the manuscript to Holland; Magnus Gabriel De la Gardie later acquired it.
The official history names Holland without reducing the stage to one city or exact transaction date.
AUDIT RECORD ↗fijands
Isaac Vossius and acquisition by De la Gardie
Vossius took the manuscript to Holland; Magnus Gabriel De la Gardie later acquired it.
The official history names Holland without reducing the stage to one city or exact transaction date.
AUDIT RECORD ↗hatizōn
Isaac Vossius and acquisition by De la Gardie
Vossius took the manuscript to Holland; Magnus Gabriel De la Gardie later bought it and presented it to Uppsala University.
The official history names Holland but does not reduce this stage to one city or exact transaction year.
AUDIT RECORD ↗tea
1655 onward
The English tea form is lexicographically reported by 1655.
The English tea stage begins with the reviewed 1655 first-known-use year and remains open into current usage.
AUDIT RECORD ↗tea
1655–today
the leaves of Camellia sinensis or a beverage made by infusing them
decimate
by 1660; sources disagree on the earliest record
Merriam-Webster’s dictionary reports 1660 for the every-tenth English sense, while its usage essay reports a record at the end of the sixteenth century. SET-U preserves the discrepancy instead of choosing a false exact date.
The before-1661 bound contains both reviewed reports: a dictionary first-known-use year of 1660 and the same publisher’s usage essay placing its earliest record at the end of the sixteenth century.
AUDIT RECORD ↗decimate
1660–today
kill every tenth member historically; later destroy or reduce drastically
quarantine
1663–today
isolation imposed to prevent the spread of disease
calculus
1666 English record
Merriam-Webster reports calculus in English in 1666 for a method or result of calculation.
1666 is the reviewed lexicographic first-known-use year, not proof of the first spoken use.
AUDIT RECORD ↗calculus
1666–today
Calculus expands across mathematics, logic, decision theory, medicine, and dentistry.
The interval begins at the reviewed English horizon; later technical specializations are not assigned invented first dates.
AUDIT RECORD ↗calculus
1666–today
a mathematical method; a system of reckoning; also a bodily stone
hatjan
custody since 1669
De la Gardie presented the codex to Uppsala University in 1669. The modern library and digital editions expose the folio that preserves hatjandam.
This stage traces evidence preservation and access, not continued Gothic speech.
AUDIT RECORD ↗hatis
custody since 1669
De la Gardie presented the codex to Uppsala University in 1669. The modern facsimile exposes folio 129r, while Project Wulfila links the wider Gothic corpus inventory.
This stage traces evidence preservation and access, not continued Gothic speech.
AUDIT RECORD ↗hatan
custody since 1669
De la Gardie presented the codex to Uppsala University in 1669. Modern facsimiles expose both folios while Project Wulfila supplies the aligned corpus analyses.
This stage traces evidence preservation and access, not continued Gothic speech.
AUDIT RECORD ↗fijan
custody since 1669
De la Gardie presented the codex to Uppsala University. Facsimiles expose four inspected tokens while Project Wulfila aligns the wider corpus.
This stage traces evidence preservation and access, not continued Gothic use.
AUDIT RECORD ↗fijands
custody since 1669
De la Gardie presented the codex to Uppsala University. Modern facsimiles expose five noun-only tokens while Project Wulfila preserves the complete inventory.
This stage traces evidence preservation and access, not continued Gothic use.
AUDIT RECORD ↗hatizōn
custody since 1669
De la Gardie presented the codex to Uppsala University in 1669. Modern editions expose the folio preserving hatizoþ.
This stage traces evidence preservation and access, not continued Gothic speech.
AUDIT RECORD ↗چائے
late 17th–19th-century spelling evidence
Rekhta reports چاہ in a Shah Mubarak Abru verse and چا in Shakespear’s 1834 dictionary before modern چائے became standard.
The range combines separately reported witnesses; it is not a claim of continuous exclusive spelling.
AUDIT RECORD ↗hotel
1687 first-known-use horizon
English borrows French hôtel as hotel for an establishment providing lodging and related services.
1687 is the reviewed English first-known-use year, not an exact date for every French-to-English contact or occurrence.
AUDIT RECORD ↗hotel
1687 lodging establishment onward
Hotel continues as the English term for an establishment offering lodging and often meals, entertainment, or personal services.
The open interval begins with the cited 1687 English first-use horizon. It does not assign every later service or institutional extension to that year.
AUDIT RECORD ↗UNBOUNDED IS
A REAL RESULT.
Stages without source-backed numeric bounds stay in their complete Journey Atlas route, carry an explicit temporal note, and remain absent here until the evidence supports normalization. The missing point is visible work—not permission to guess.