RECURSIVE ANCESTOR EXPLORER
GLOBAL GRAPH ↗NORTH-STAR FEATURE / ROOT OF THE ROOT
WORD → PARENT → PARENT → UNKNOWNGO TO
THE ROOT.
Do not stop at the first ancestor. Follow every cited route—through compounds, reconstructions, and disagreements—until human knowledge actually stops.
hata
Old Norse hata is not only a medieval label for an inward feeling. The Dictionary of Old Norse Prose structures 101 prose citations under four active senses before its participial and reflexive branches: persecute; despise, reject, or cast aside; mock or humiliate; and hate, despise, or stand hostile toward. That ordering is a lexicographic analysis, not a chronology of semantic change. Fritzner independently begins with pursue or seek to destroy, continues through damage or destruction, and only then gives hate opposed to love. Zoëga likewise preserves poetic damage or destruction beside ordinary hate, while Cleasby and Vigfússon record active, reflexive, reciprocal, participial, and disputed poetic uses. Lexicon Poeticum displays eleven linked rows, including variants, damage, destruction, persecution, loathing, haters, and the gold-spending formula, but warns that its concordance has not been reviewed and that dates need checking. A c1200 scan of Holm perg 15 4°, folio 89v, was directly inspected against ONP's diplomatic transcription and visibly preserves hata in the line Elſcaþu hréinlife oc hata engi maɴ. All other rows remain source-reported. The generated possible runic inscriptions on modern dictionary transcriptions are excluded, and no exact historical pronunciation is invented.
“Old Norse hate was not trapped inside the mind. The same verb could persecute, reject, humiliate, damage, destroy, and enter reciprocal hostility before a dictionary ever reached the familiar feeling sense.”OPEN COMPLETE WORD DOSSIER ↗
EVERY REVIEWED PARENT, NOT ONE EDITORIAL PATH
FOLLOW EVERY BRANCH.
Compound components and competing routes stay separate. Every arrow retains its sound change, semantic change, scholar, confidence, and exact sources.
to persecute; reject or despise; humiliate; hate; damage or destroy in poetic use; become or remain hostile in reflexive constructions
reconstructed class-III or related weak verbs meaning hate
RECONSTRUCTED, NOT DIRECTLY ATTESTED
- SOUND CHANGE
- Old Norse h continues the Germanic fricative Orel writes x, while the weak-verb stem and North Germanic inflection produce the attested hata paradigm. The reviewed sources do not expose one complete dated series of intermediate spoken forms.
- SEMANTIC CHANGE
- The inherited hostility verb is distributed across persecution, rejection, humiliation, hate, damage or destruction, participial, and reciprocal constructions. Dictionary sense order is not promoted as a chronological semantic path.
- SCHOLAR
- Vladimir Orel · Dictionary of Old Norse Prose editors · Johan Fritzner
- CONFIDENCE
- probable — The comparative family is published across Germanic branches, but reconstruction notation varies and the exact prehistoric semantic center is not recoverable.
- CHRONOLOGY
- Proto-Germanic reconstruction into Old Norse prose, poetry, and a directly inspected c1200 manuscript token.
Publishes the reconstructed weak-verb alternation and the Old Norse daughter.
ORIGINAL ↗Documents the attested Old Norse verb, inflectional class, and semantic and grammatical range.
ORIGINAL ↗Supplies active, reflexive, reciprocal, and participial Old Norse grammar.
ORIGINAL ↗Independently preserves the action-to-feeling range and Germanic comparisons.
ORIGINAL ↗THE ASTERISK IS A PROMISE
RECONSTRUCTION IS
NOT INSCRIPTION.
Crossing into a starred form changes the evidence class. The interface marks that crossing, preserves confidence, and never manufactures the next root to make the picture look complete.