*SET-U

RECURSIVE ANCESTOR EXPLORER

GLOBAL GRAPH ↗

NORTH-STAR FEATURE / ROOT OF THE ROOT

WORD → PARENT → PARENT → UNKNOWN

GO TO
THE ROOT.

Do not stop at the first ancestor. Follow every cited route—through compounds, reconstructions, and disagreements—until human knowledge actually stops.

START / NODE 1250Old NorseOld Norse prose and poetic record

hata

Old Norse hata is not only a medieval label for an inward feeling. The Dictionary of Old Norse Prose structures 101 prose citations under four active senses before its participial and reflexive branches: persecute; despise, reject, or cast aside; mock or humiliate; and hate, despise, or stand hostile toward. That ordering is a lexicographic analysis, not a chronology of semantic change. Fritzner independently begins with pursue or seek to destroy, continues through damage or destruction, and only then gives hate opposed to love. Zoëga likewise preserves poetic damage or destruction beside ordinary hate, while Cleasby and Vigfússon record active, reflexive, reciprocal, participial, and disputed poetic uses. Lexicon Poeticum displays eleven linked rows, including variants, damage, destruction, persecution, loathing, haters, and the gold-spending formula, but warns that its concordance has not been reviewed and that dates need checking. A c1200 scan of Holm perg 15 4°, folio 89v, was directly inspected against ONP's diplomatic transcription and visibly preserves hata in the line Elſcaþu hréinlife oc hata engi maɴ. All other rows remain source-reported. The generated possible runic inscriptions on modern dictionary transcriptions are excluded, and no exact historical pronunciation is invented.

“Old Norse hate was not trapped inside the mind. The same verb could persecute, reject, humiliate, damage, destroy, and enter reciprocal hostility before a dictionary ever reached the familiar feeling sense.”
OPEN COMPLETE WORD DOSSIER ↗
24CANONICAL NODES
23REVIEWED EDGES
1FIRST PARENT ROUTES
4RECONSTRUCTIONS
19KNOWLEDGE HORIZONS
25EDGE CITATIONS

EVERY REVIEWED PARENT, NOT ONE EDITORIAL PATH

FOLLOW EVERY BRANCH.

Compound components and competing routes stay separate. Every arrow retains its sound change, semantic change, scholar, confidence, and exact sources.

01
PARENT ROUTES1 REVIEWED RELATIONSHIP
EDGE 1223INHERITANCEPROBABLE
*

RECONSTRUCTED, NOT DIRECTLY ATTESTED

SOUND CHANGE
Old Norse h continues the Germanic fricative Orel writes x, while the weak-verb stem and North Germanic inflection produce the attested hata paradigm. The reviewed sources do not expose one complete dated series of intermediate spoken forms.
SEMANTIC CHANGE
The inherited hostility verb is distributed across persecution, rejection, humiliation, hate, damage or destruction, participial, and reciprocal constructions. Dictionary sense order is not promoted as a chronological semantic path.
SCHOLAR
Vladimir Orel · Dictionary of Old Norse Prose editors · Johan Fritzner
CONFIDENCE
probable — The comparative family is published across Germanic branches, but reconstruction notation varies and the exact prehistoric semantic center is not recoverable.
CHRONOLOGY
Proto-Germanic reconstruction into Old Norse prose, poetry, and a directly inspected c1200 manuscript token.
*

THE ASTERISK IS A PROMISE

RECONSTRUCTION IS
NOT INSCRIPTION.

Crossing into a starred form changes the evidence class. The interface marks that crossing, preserves confidence, and never manufactures the next root to make the picture look complete.