The history of Codex argenteus
Documents the post-copying custody route.
Codex argenteus’ journey- AUTHOR / EDITOR
- Uppsala University Library
- YEAR
- 2026
- PUBLISHER
- Uppsala University
PERMANENT DISPUTE RECORD
ALL DISPUTES ↗One scholarly question. Every attached source. The present editorial state, without pretending the last word has been written.
No. Werden, Prague, Stockholm, Holland, and Uppsala trace custody of evidence objects long after Gothic ceased to be a living vernacular in those places.
/ˈfi.jands/ · Gothic masculine nd-stem common noun
A Gothic masculine nd-stem noun conventionally glossed enemy. Project Wulfila currently exposes 26 candidates: three verified noun assignments, two further noun-only assignments, and 21 surface forms also listed under the living verb fijan. Ayora Estevan explains the collision diachronically: Proto-Germanic had already lexicalized the present-participial *fi(j)and- as enemy, while Gothic retained productive one-who-hates participles beside the noun. The five noun-only candidates use fiand, fijands, fijande, and fijandis; all five were inspected in Codex Argenteus facsimiles.
DIRECT CLAIM EVIDENCE
A citation is not a vote. Each record says whether the work supports, challenges, contradicts, or contextualizes the position—and identifies the exact locus used.
Documents the post-copying custody route.
Codex argenteus’ journeyIdentifies the fourth inspected noun-only token.
Folio 123r facsimileIdentifies the fifth inspected noun-only token.
Folio 164v facsimileIdentifies the third inspected noun-only token.
Folio 27r facsimileIdentifies two inspected noun-only tokens inside that route.
Folio 3v facsimilePost-Ravenna journey stages are labeled object custody rather than lexical diffusion.