PERMANENT SOURCE RECORD
ALL SOURCES ↗BIBLIOGRAPHIC IDENTITYcodex-argenteus-3v
SOURCE
RECORD.
One work. Every claim that depends on it. No citation without a consequence you can inspect.
9 PUBLIC LINKS INTO THE GRAPH.
This count excludes duplicate dossier-path citations. Open the claims below to see exactly how the source is used.
digitized primary sourcecodex-argenteus-3v
Codex Argenteus facsimile 6 — folio 3v, Matthew 5:42–47
- AUTHOR / EDITOR
- Uppsala University Library · Project Codex Argenteus Online
- YEAR
- 1927
- PUBLISHER
- Project Codex Argenteus Online
- DOI
- Not recorded
- SOURCE TYPE
- digitized primary source
- EXTERNAL RECORD
- OPEN ORIGINAL ↗
012
CONTRARIAN TRUTH CLAIMS
RANKED REVEALS THAT CITE THIS SOURCE
RANK 29GRADE Asupports
One Gothic hate verb survives once—in a command to do good to those who hate you.
Project Wulfila’s only verified hatjan token is hatjandam in Matthew 5:44, directly visible on Codex Argenteus folio 3v. A parallel “love your enemies” command in Luke 6:27 instead uses hatandans from class-III hatan. The translation gloss “hate” therefore hides a genuine grammatical and historical dispute.
*ḱeh₂d-
*ḱeh₂d- → *ḱh₂d-es- → *hatiz- → *xatjanan → hatjan
Folio 3v, line containing þaim hatjandam izwisProvides the directly inspected manuscript object.
hatjan dossier ↗truth record ↗89UNVEILING
RANK 33GRADE Asupports
Enemy is a fossilized hater—but lexicalization does not make every token transparent.
Project Wulfila lists 26 candidates under the Gothic enemy noun and 42 under the verb fijan; exactly 21 surface tokens belong to both inventories. Ayora Estevan explains why: Proto-Germanic had already lexicalized one who hates as enemy, while Gothic retained the productive participle. The five noun-only tokens are directly inspected; the 21-token overlap remains public instead of being counted twice as certainty.
*peh₁-
*peh₁- → *fi(j)ēn- → *fi(j)and- → fijands
Folio 3v, fiand and fijandsProvides two directly inspected noun-only tokens.
fijands dossier ↗truth record ↗89UNVEILING
022
SCHOLARLY DISAGREEMENT
DISPUTE POSITIONS THAT CITE THIS SOURCE
resolvedcontextestablished
Does the Codex Argenteus route map the geographic spread of fijands?
No. Werden, Prague, Stockholm, Holland, and Uppsala trace custody of evidence objects long after Gothic ceased to be a living vernacular in those places.
Folio 3v facsimileIdentifies two inspected noun-only tokens inside that route.
resolvedsupportsestablished
Is the infinitive hatjan itself written in the surviving manuscript?
No. The directly inspected form is hatjandam, a weak masculine dative-plural present participle. Hatjan is the normalized lexical citation form assigned by Project Wulfila and the historical grammars.
Folio 3v, line containing þaim hatjandam izwisProvides the directly inspected manuscript pixels.
030
CANONICAL RELATIONSHIP CLAIMS
EDGES THAT CITE THIS SOURCE
No canonical ancestry edge currently cites this source.
043
LEXICAL ATTESTATIONS
WITNESSES REPORTED BY THIS SOURCE
hatjanINSPECTED
hatjan
Codex Argenteus, Matthew 5:44
OPEN WITNESS 247 ↗fijandsINSPECTED
fijands
Codex Argenteus, Matthew 5:43
OPEN WITNESS 307 ↗fijandsINSPECTED
fijands
Codex Argenteus, Matthew 5:44
OPEN WITNESS 308 ↗050
COMPARATIVE EVIDENCE
COGNATES, DESCENDANTS, AND RELATIVES
No comparative-relative record currently cites this source.
062
GEOGRAPHIC AND TEMPORAL CLAIMS
JOURNEY STAGES THAT CITE THIS SOURCE
070
NON-GENEALOGICAL CONNECTIONS
HISTORICAL CONTEXT, KEPT SEPARATE
No non-genealogical context link currently cites this source.
082
WORD-FAMILY REUSE