*SET-U

PERMANENT SOURCE RECORD

ALL SOURCES ↗
BIBLIOGRAPHIC IDENTITYcodex-argenteus-123r

SOURCE
RECORD.

One work. Every claim that depends on it. No citation without a consequence you can inspect.

CLAIM-LEVEL USAGE

12 PUBLIC LINKS INTO THE GRAPH.

This count excludes duplicate dossier-path citations. Open the claims below to see exactly how the source is used.

digitized primary sourcecodex-argenteus-123r

Codex Argenteus facsimile 145 — folio 123r, Luke 1:69–77

AUTHOR / EDITOR
Uppsala University Library · Project Codex Argenteus Online
YEAR
1927
PUBLISHER
Project Codex Argenteus Online
DOI
Not recorded
SOURCE TYPE
digitized primary source
EXTERNAL RECORD
OPEN ORIGINAL ↗
0CANONICAL EDGES
3WITNESSES
0COMPARISONS
0CONTEXT LINKS
3RANKED REVEALS
3DISPUTES
3JOURNEY STAGES
3WORD DOSSIERS
01

CONTRARIAN TRUTH CLAIMS

RANKED REVEALS THAT CITE THIS SOURCE

3
RANK 31GRADE Asupports

Gothic’s two hate verbs trade places across two passages.

The complete surviving hatan corpus contains only hatandane in Luke 1:71 and hatandans in Luke 6:27. In Luke 1, fijandam supplies enemies while hatandane supplies those hating; in Luke 6, hatandans supplies enemies while fijandam supplies those hating. Both Codex Argenteus pages are directly inspected. The lexical swap—and the class-III versus class-I dispute—cannot be represented by one timeless translation arrow.

*ḱeh₂d-

*ḱeh₂d- → *ḱh₂d-es- → *hatiz- → *xatēnan ~ *xatōjanan → hatan

Folio 123r, line containing þize hatandane unsis

Provides the first directly inspected manuscript object.

RANK 32GRADE Asupports

Enemy is a fossilized hater—but 21 Gothic tokens still refuse to choose.

Project Wulfila lists 42 candidates under fijan and 26 under the enemy noun fijands. Their intersection is exactly 21 surface tokens. Ayora Estevan explains the collision: *fi(j)and- had lexicalized as enemy before Gothic, while Gothic still possessed the productive present participle one who hates. Case and syntax resolve some passages; the remaining 21 stay public as noun-versus-participle ambiguity.

*peh₁-

*peh₁- → *fi(j)ēn- → fijan

Folio 123r, ambiguous fijandam

Provides one directly inspected overlap token.

RANK 33GRADE Asupports

Enemy is a fossilized hater—but lexicalization does not make every token transparent.

Project Wulfila lists 26 candidates under the Gothic enemy noun and 42 under the verb fijan; exactly 21 surface tokens belong to both inventories. Ayora Estevan explains why: Proto-Germanic had already lexicalized one who hates as enemy, while Gothic retained the productive participle. The five noun-only tokens are directly inspected; the 21-token overlap remains public instead of being counted twice as certainty.

*peh₁-

*peh₁- → *fi(j)ēn- → *fi(j)and- → fijands

Folio 123r, fijande

Provides a fourth directly inspected noun-only token.

02

SCHOLARLY DISAGREEMENT

DISPUTE POSITIONS THAT CITE THIS SOURCE

3
03

CANONICAL RELATIONSHIP CLAIMS

EDGES THAT CITE THIS SOURCE

0
No canonical ancestry edge currently cites this source.
04

LEXICAL ATTESTATIONS

WITNESSES REPORTED BY THIS SOURCE

3
05

COMPARATIVE EVIDENCE

COGNATES, DESCENDANTS, AND RELATIVES

0
No comparative-relative record currently cites this source.
06

GEOGRAPHIC AND TEMPORAL CLAIMS

JOURNEY STAGES THAT CITE THIS SOURCE

3
07

NON-GENEALOGICAL CONNECTIONS

HISTORICAL CONTEXT, KEPT SEPARATE

0
No non-genealogical context link currently cites this source.
08

WORD-FAMILY REUSE

DOSSIERS THAT DEPEND ON THIS SOURCE

3
fijan4 CLAIM LINKS↗fijands4 CLAIM LINKS↗hatan4 CLAIM LINKS↗