*SET-U

WITNESS / 263

ALL WITNESSES ↗
PERMANENT ATTESTATION RECORDWITNESS / 263

OBJECT
BEFORE
CLAIM.

DIRECTLY INSPECTED PRIMARY OBJECT

THE IMAGE WAS CHECKED.

The facsimile pixels were directly inspected against Project Wulfila’s verse transcription. The object verifies written hatandane in context; it does not show the infinitive hatan, establish a first Gothic use, prove spoken frequency, or by pixels alone choose between the formally possible masculine and neuter genitive-plural analyses.

Gothicearly 6th centuryestablished

hatan

Codex Argenteus, Luke 1:71

“giban nasein us fijandam unsaraim jah us handau allaize þize hatandane unsis”
WITNESS TYPE
Manuscript
YEAR
510
LOCATOR
DG 1, fol. 123r; facsimile 145; Luke 1:71; line containing “þize hatandane unsis”
REPOSITORY
Uppsala University Library
SHELFMARK / OBJECT ID
DG 1, fol. 123r
FACSIMILE
Linked below
DIRECT INSPECTION
Yes
CONFIDENCE
established
01

REPEATABLE VISUAL REVIEW

THE INSPECTION LEDGER

OBSERVED FORMhatandane
“allaize þize hatandane unsis”
INSPECTION DATE
2026-08-27
METHOD
visual facsimile
INSPECTOR ROLE
SET-U editorial review
EXACT LOCATOR
Codex Argenteus DG 1, fol. 123r, facsimile 145, Luke 1:71, line containing “þize hatandane unsis”
CLAIM LIMIT
Verifies the manuscript glyph sequence transcribed hatandane when the image is aligned with the verse transcription. It does not show the normalized infinitive hatan, establish a first Gothic use, prove the contextual gender without grammatical analysis, or recover the verb’s prehistoric history.
REOPEN THE INSPECTED PIXELS ↗
02

BIBLIOGRAPHIC PROVENANCE

THE SOURCE BEHIND THE CLAIM

TITLE
Codex Argenteus facsimile 145 — folio 123r, Luke 1:69–77
AUTHOR
Uppsala University Library · Project Codex Argenteus Online
YEAR
1927
PUBLISHER
Project Codex Argenteus Online
SOURCE TYPE
digitized primary source
CITATION KEY
codex-argenteus-123r