WITNESS / 286
ALL WITNESSES ↗PERMANENT ATTESTATION RECORDWITNESS / 286
OBJECT
BEFORE
CLAIM.
THE IMAGE WAS CHECKED.
The facsimile verifies written fijandam in the enemies clause. It cannot settle Project Wulfila’s explicit lexical ambiguity between the fijan participle and the lexicalized noun fijands.
Gothicearly 6th centuryproposed
fijan
Codex Argenteus, Luke 1:71
“giban nasein us fijandam unsaraim jah us handau allaize þize hatandane unsis”
- WITNESS TYPE
- Manuscript
- YEAR
- 510
- LOCATOR
- DG 1, fol. 123r; facsimile 145; Luke 1:71; line containing “us fijandam unsaraim”
- REPOSITORY
- Uppsala University Library
- SHELFMARK / OBJECT ID
- DG 1, fol. 123r
- FACSIMILE
- Linked below
- DIRECT INSPECTION
- Yes
- CONFIDENCE
- proposed
WORD DOSSIERfijan ↗
CANONICAL FORM NODENODE 1154 ↗
INSPECTED FACSIMILEOPEN OBJECT ↗
01
REPEATABLE VISUAL REVIEW
THE INSPECTION LEDGER
OBSERVED FORMfijandam
“us fijandam unsaraim”
- INSPECTION DATE
- 2026-08-27
- METHOD
- visual facsimile
- INSPECTOR ROLE
- SET-U editorial review
- EXACT LOCATOR
- Codex Argenteus DG 1, fol. 123r, facsimile 145, Luke 1:71, line containing “us fijandam unsaraim”
- CLAIM LIMIT
- Verifies the written token fijandam in the enemies clause. The pixels do not decide whether the form is the fijan participle or the lexicalized noun fijands, and they do not establish a first use.
02
BIBLIOGRAPHIC PROVENANCE
THE SOURCE BEHIND THE CLAIM
- TITLE
- Codex Argenteus facsimile 145 — folio 123r, Luke 1:69–77
- AUTHOR
- Uppsala University Library · Project Codex Argenteus Online
- YEAR
- 1927
- PUBLISHER
- Project Codex Argenteus Online
- SOURCE TYPE
- digitized primary source
- CITATION KEY
- codex-argenteus-123r