*SET-U

WITNESS / 466

ALL WITNESSES ↗
PERMANENT ATTESTATION RECORDWITNESS / 466

OBJECT
BEFORE
CLAIM.

DIRECTLY INSPECTED PRIMARY OBJECT

THE IMAGE WAS CHECKED.

The facsimile pixels were directly inspected against Project Wulfila’s verse transcription and token locator. The object verifies the glyph sequence transcribed hatizoþ in the anger question; it does not itself write the infinitive hatizōn, mark long ō, establish the morphological parse without grammatical analysis, prove a first Gothic use, measure spoken frequency, or recover prehistoric ancestry.

Gothicearly 6th centuryestablished

hatizōn

Codex Argenteus, John 7:23

“iþ mis hatizoþ, unte allana mannan hailana gatawida in sabbato?”
WITNESS TYPE
Manuscript
YEAR
510
LOCATOR
DG 1, fol. 94v; facsimile 60; John 7:23; line containing “iþ mis hatizoþ”
REPOSITORY
Uppsala University Library
SHELFMARK / OBJECT ID
DG 1, fol. 94v
FACSIMILE
Linked below
DIRECT INSPECTION
Yes
CONFIDENCE
established
01

REPEATABLE VISUAL REVIEW

THE INSPECTION LEDGER

OBSERVED FORMhatizoþ
“iþ mis hatizoþ, unte allana mannan hailana gatawida in sabbato?”
INSPECTION DATE
2026-08-27
METHOD
visual facsimile
INSPECTOR ROLE
SET-U editorial review
EXACT LOCATOR
Codex Argenteus DG 1, fol. 94v, facsimile 60, John 7:23, line containing “iþ mis hatizoþ”
CLAIM LIMIT
Verifies the visible manuscript sequence transcribed hatizoþ when the page is aligned with Project Wulfila’s verse and word analysis. It does not independently establish the normalized infinitive, editorial vowel length, grammatical person and number, first use, complete semantics, exact spoken realization, or reconstructed ancestry.
REOPEN THE INSPECTED PIXELS ↗
02

BIBLIOGRAPHIC PROVENANCE

THE SOURCE BEHIND THE CLAIM

TITLE
Codex Argenteus facsimile 60 — folio 94v, John 7:22–28
AUTHOR
Uppsala University Library · Project Codex Argenteus Online
YEAR
1927
PUBLISHER
Project Codex Argenteus Online
SOURCE TYPE
digitized primary source
CITATION KEY
codex-argenteus-94v