PERMANENT SOURCE RECORD
ALL SOURCES ↗SOURCE
RECORD.
One work. Every claim that depends on it. No citation without a consequence you can inspect.
7 PUBLIC LINKS INTO THE GRAPH.
This count excludes duplicate dossier-path citations. Open the claims below to see exactly how the source is used.
Codex Argenteus facsimile 60 — folio 94v, John 7:22–28
- AUTHOR / EDITOR
- Uppsala University Library · Project Codex Argenteus Online
- YEAR
- 1927
- PUBLISHER
- Project Codex Argenteus Online
- DOI
- Not recorded
- SOURCE TYPE
- digitized primary source
- EXTERNAL RECORD
- OPEN ORIGINAL ↗
CONTRARIAN TRUTH CLAIMS
RANKED REVEALS THAT CITE THIS SOURCE
One Gothic anger verb survives in one question—and not in its dictionary form.
Project Wulfila’s complete current inventory contains one hatizōn token: hatizoþ in John 7:23, “are you angry at me?” Codex Argenteus folio 94v directly preserves the inflection. The manuscript never writes the normalized infinitive or its editorial macron. Grammar then reveals another layer: hatizōn is a class-II verb built from the consonantal stem hatiz- of hatis “hatred” or “wrath.” One English gloss therefore hides a noun-to-verb formation, one surviving grammatical person, and a sharp boundary between pixels and reconstruction.
*ḱeh₂d- → *ḱh₂d-es- → *hatiz- → hatis → hatizōn
Codex Argenteus folio 94v, facsimile 60Provides the directly inspected manuscript object.
SCHOLARLY DISAGREEMENT
DISPUTE POSITIONS THAT CITE THIS SOURCE
Can one exact spoken pronunciation be recovered?
No recorded voice survives. The macron and grammatical spelling support a historical phonological analysis, but they do not license an audio-like exact realization.
Written manuscript tokenProvides letters rather than recorded speech.
Is the normalized infinitive hatizōn written in the surviving manuscript?
No. The manuscript token is hatizoþ. Hatizōn is the lexicographic citation form reconstructed from the inflectional paradigm and printed by the historical grammars.
Folio 94v, line containing iþ mis hatizoþProvides the directly inspected manuscript pixels.
Does the manuscript write the macron in hatizōn?
No. Gothic spelling on the inspected folio writes hatizoþ without a macron. The macron in the scholarly citation form represents analyzed vowel length.
Folio 94v, visible hatizoþProvides the manuscript spelling without an editorial macron.
Is hatizoþ second-person plural present indicative?
Project Wulfila analyzes it as active indicative present second-person plural. The pixels verify the form, while the grammatical label remains an editorial morphological analysis.
Folio 94v, visible tokenSupports the written form but not the morphology by pixels alone.
CANONICAL RELATIONSHIP CLAIMS
EDGES THAT CITE THIS SOURCE
LEXICAL ATTESTATIONS
WITNESSES REPORTED BY THIS SOURCE
hatizōn
Codex Argenteus, John 7:23
OPEN WITNESS 466 ↗COMPARATIVE EVIDENCE
COGNATES, DESCENDANTS, AND RELATIVES
GEOGRAPHIC AND TEMPORAL CLAIMS
JOURNEY STAGES THAT CITE THIS SOURCE
Ravenna
Supplies the directly inspected page preserving the token.
Facsimile 60, fol. 94v · regionalNON-GENEALOGICAL CONNECTIONS
HISTORICAL CONTEXT, KEPT SEPARATE
WORD-FAMILY REUSE