*SET-U

THE TIMELINE ATLAS

JOURNEY ATLAS ↗

FORM / ROUTE / BOUND

1398 REVIEWED EVENTS

LANGUAGE
IN TIME.

One cross-word chronology for every defensibly bounded form and journey stage—without converting a vague historical label into a fake year.

1398BOUNDED EVENTS

820 canonical forms + 578 route stages.

4500 BCEEARLIEST ENCODED BOUND

A reviewed graph bound, not a claim of an earliest human word.

578NORMALIZED JOURNEY STAGES

Only stages with directly cited numeric bounds enter this atlas.

381JOURNEY DATES WITHHELD

Labels remain visible in Journey Atlas, but not parsed into false years.

00

FILTER THE CHRONOLOGY

WHEN DID THE EVIDENCE LAND?

12 MATCHING EVENTS
THE TEMPORAL CONTRACT

TWO CLOCKS.
NO FALSE PRECISION.

FORM CHRONOLOGY dates a canonical linguistic form or reconstruction in the lexical graph.

ROUTE CHRONOLOGY dates a geographic or transmission stage in a word’s journey.

They can share an era band, but they are never silently treated as the same kind of claim.

01

CROSS-WORD CHRONOLOGY / EARLIEST BOUND FIRST

THE EVIDENCE IN TIME

PAGE 1 / 1
Prehistory1 ON THIS PAGE
4500 BCE–2500 BCErange
ROUTE STAGEProposed Indo-European linguistic horizon

cais

*kad- and *kad-t/si-

The deepest displayed route is a cross-branch comparative proposal. No archaeological point, single speech community, or original love-versus-hate meaning is asserted.

2 EVIDENCE LINKS

Conventional comparative bounds, not dates of attested tokens.

AUDIT RECORD ↗
Antiquity5 ON THIS PAGE
500 BCE–200 CErange
ROUTE STAGEProto-Germanic linguistic horizon

friend

*frī-

The like, love, or friendly base is reconstructed from daughter-language evidence; no Proto-Germanic speaker, homeland point, or manuscript token is claimed.

2 EVIDENCE LINKS

A comparative-linguistic interval, not a directly dated word.

AUDIT RECORD ↗
500 BCE–200 CErange
ROUTE STAGEProto-Germanic lexical horizon

Freund

*frī-

The love or favor base is reconstructed from daughter-language evidence; no single homeland point or recorded token is claimed.

1 EVIDENCE LINK

A comparative-linguistic interval.

AUDIT RECORD ↗
500 BCE–200 CErange
ROUTE STAGEProto-Germanic lexical horizon

vriend

*frī-

The love or favor base is reconstructed from daughter-language evidence and is not pinned to one location.

1 EVIDENCE LINK

A comparative-linguistic interval.

AUDIT RECORD ↗
500 BCE–200 CErange
ROUTE STAGEProto-Germanic linguistic horizon

frændi

*frī-

The like, love, or friendly base is reconstructed from daughter-language evidence; no Proto-Germanic speaker, homeland point, or written occurrence is claimed.

2 EVIDENCE LINKS

A comparative-linguistic interval, not a directly dated word.

AUDIT RECORD ↗
500 BCE–200 CErange
ROUTE STAGEProto-Germanic linguistic horizon

frēond

*frī-

The like, love, or friendly base is reconstructed from daughter-language evidence. No Proto-Germanic speaker, homeland point, or written occurrence is claimed.

2 EVIDENCE LINKS

A comparative-linguistic interval, not a directly dated word.

AUDIT RECORD ↗
Medieval5 ON THIS PAGE
900 CE–1200 CErange
ROUTE STAGEMedieval Irish textual and glossary tradition

cais

cais and caise

eDIL groups citations capable of love or hate readings under its first cais headword. Individual cited objects and composition dates were not normalized or directly inspected.

2 EVIDENCE LINKS

A conventional Middle Irish language-stage range; it is not an earliest-use claim for the headword or either sense.

AUDIT RECORD ↗
1050 CE–1350 CErange
ROUTE STAGEMiddle High German textual record

Freund

vriunt

Pfeifer and Grimm document friend, neighbor, lover, and relative senses across the Middle High German record.

1 EVIDENCE LINK

Conventional Middle High German bounds, not one standardization event.

AUDIT RECORD ↗
1175 CE–1225 CEcirca
ROUTE STAGEOld Norse homily manuscript tradition

hata

Holm perg 15 4° folio 89v, c1200

A directly inspected leaf writes hata in a command that contrasts love with hating no person. The scan establishes a textual object, not one geographic birthplace.

2 EVIDENCE LINKS

The interval operationalizes ONP's c1200 manuscript date.

AUDIT RECORD ↗
BEFORE 1200 CEbefore
ROUTE STAGEAnglo-Saxon England

love

Old English period; English record before 12th c.

Bosworth–Toller documents Old English lufu; Merriam-Webster traces Middle English love from that form and reports English use before the twelfth century.

2 EVIDENCE LINKS

The directly reviewed lexicographic record establishes an English first-known-use horizon before the twelfth century. The route does not promote the older undemonstrated “before 725” label into numeric chronology.

AUDIT RECORD ↗
1400 CE–1500 CErange
ROUTE STAGELate-medieval and early-modern textual transmission

hata

rejection, humiliation, and ordinary hate

ONP citations preserve contempt for gold, humiliation with insults, and many love-versus-hate contexts across later witnesses.

2 EVIDENCE LINKS

A textual-transmission range, not proof that any meaning began or ended there.

AUDIT RECORD ↗
Early modern1 ON THIS PAGE
1500 CE →open
ROUTE STAGEGlobal English

love

1500–today

The word continues through the worldwide history of English: colonial expansion, migration, localization, and modern international use.

2 EVIDENCE LINKS

The numeric layer marks the early-modern-to-current global-English stage, not the first known use of love. Cambridge traces the worldwide expansion of English from early modern voyages through colonial and postcolonial adoption.

AUDIT RECORD ↗
02 / WHAT STAYS OUT

UNBOUNDED IS
A REAL RESULT.

Stages without source-backed numeric bounds stay in their complete Journey Atlas route, carry an explicit temporal note, and remain absent here until the evidence supports normalization. The missing point is visible work—not permission to guess.

INSPECT ALL JOURNEYS ↗EXPORT TIMELINE EVENTS ↗