PERMANENT SOURCE RECORD
ALL SOURCES ↗SOURCE
RECORD.
One work. Every claim that depends on it. No citation without a consequence you can inspect.
7 PUBLIC LINKS INTO THE GRAPH.
This count excludes duplicate dossier-path citations. Open the claims below to see exactly how the source is used.
Lemma hatizon — class-II Gothic verb and one-occurrence inventory
- AUTHOR / EDITOR
- Project Wulfila editors · Wilhelm Streitberg
- YEAR
- 2026
- PUBLISHER
- Project Wulfila · University of Antwerp
- DOI
- Not recorded
- SOURCE TYPE
- research database
- EXTERNAL RECORD
- OPEN ORIGINAL ↗
CONTRARIAN TRUTH CLAIMS
RANKED REVEALS THAT CITE THIS SOURCE
One Gothic anger verb survives in one question—and not in its dictionary form.
Project Wulfila’s complete current inventory contains one hatizōn token: hatizoþ in John 7:23, “are you angry at me?” Codex Argenteus folio 94v directly preserves the inflection. The manuscript never writes the normalized infinitive or its editorial macron. Grammar then reveals another layer: hatizōn is a class-II verb built from the consonantal stem hatiz- of hatis “hatred” or “wrath.” One English gloss therefore hides a noun-to-verb formation, one surviving grammatical person, and a sharp boundary between pixels and reconstruction.
*ḱeh₂d- → *ḱh₂d-es- → *hatiz- → hatis → hatizōn
Lemma hatizon, one verified occurrenceBounds the claim to one current corpus token.
SCHOLARLY DISAGREEMENT
DISPUTE POSITIONS THAT CITE THIS SOURCE
Is the normalized infinitive hatizōn written in the surviving manuscript?
No. The manuscript token is hatizoþ. Hatizōn is the lexicographic citation form reconstructed from the inflectional paradigm and printed by the historical grammars.
Lemma hatizon and occurrence hatizoþDistinguishes the normalized citation form from the written token.
Does the current Project Wulfila corpus contain exactly one verified occurrence?
Yes. The lemma page lists only John 7:23 hatizoþ. This is a bounded statement about the current surviving corpus, not all historical Gothic.
Occurrences: one verified John 7:23 tokenDefines the bounded current corpus count.
Was hatizōn formed from hatis?
Yes as the reviewed grammatical analysis. The University of Texas table explicitly gives hatis, stem hatiz-, and hatizōn; Wright independently classifies the verb as weak class II.
Lemma hatizon, sw.V.2Confirms the current corpus inflection class.
Does one surviving token prove the verb was rare in spoken Gothic?
No. It proves only that the current surviving and verified corpus contains one assigned token. The fragmentary manuscript record cannot measure ordinary speech.
One verified occurrence inventoryBounds the corpus claim.
CANONICAL RELATIONSHIP CLAIMS
EDGES THAT CITE THIS SOURCE
hatizōn → hatis
Gothic → Gothic · derivation
- SOUND
- The consonantal stem hatiz- of hatis receives the class-II weak-verb formation represented by the citation form hatizōn and the written second-person plural hatizoþ. The long ō is an editorial phonological representation, not a separate manuscript letter.
- MEANING
- A noun for hatred, wrath, or anger supplies a verb whose one surviving context means be angry with or at someone. One token does not establish whether the verb ever carried the noun’s entire semantic range.
- SCHOLAR / EDITOR
- Todd B. Krause · Jonathan Slocum · Joseph Wright · Wilhelm Streitberg · Project Wulfila editors
Lemma hatizon, sw.V.2, one verified occurrenceIdentifies the corpus lemma, class, government with the dative, and bounded occurrence inventory.
LEXICAL ATTESTATIONS
WITNESSES REPORTED BY THIS SOURCE
COMPARATIVE EVIDENCE
COGNATES, DESCENDANTS, AND RELATIVES
GEOGRAPHIC AND TEMPORAL CLAIMS
JOURNEY STAGES THAT CITE THIS SOURCE
Gothic translation tradition
Locates the lexical choice in the surviving Gothic textual tradition.
Lemma hatizon and one-occurrence inventory · broadNON-GENEALOGICAL CONNECTIONS
HISTORICAL CONTEXT, KEPT SEPARATE
WORD-FAMILY REUSE
DOSSIERS THAT DEPEND ON THIS SOURCE
1 entry-scoped citations map reviewed dossier paths onto the canonical claims above.