*SET-U

GRAPH-WIDE SEARCH

MEASURE THE GRAPH ↗

NOT JUST A DICTIONARY LOOKUP

6 EVIDENCE COLLECTIONS

SEARCH
THE GRAPH.

Find a modern word—or search sideways through reconstructed roots, historical forms, meanings, languages, scholars, sources, claims, disputes, and witnesses.

WIKTIONARY VIA KAIKKI / WIKTEXTRACT

Imported dictionary evidence

SOURCE-IMPORTED · UNREVIEWED

These are source reports, not reviewed *SET-U ancestry. A list of templates or numbered etymologies is not an ancestor chain. Scholarly disagreements remain in the original source text.

35,981 English word records · 45,491 etymology sections in this online subset

PARTIAL ENGLISH COVERAGE · FULL CORPUS REMAINS LOCAL

4 source sections across 1 headword matching “Mine”. These are separate from the reviewed results below.

Open the permanent entry for mine →
mineEnglish (en) · Etymology 1Source text

From Middle English min, myn, from Old English mīn, from Proto-West Germanic *mīn, from Proto-Germanic *mīnaz, from Proto-Indo-European *méynos. Cognate with Saterland Frisian mien, West Frisian myn, Dutch mijn, Low German mien, German mein, Danish, Norwegian Bokmål, Norwegian Nynorsk, and Swedish min, Faroese and Icelandic mín.

Original Wiktionary entry and references ↗
mineEnglish (en) · Etymology 2Source text

From Middle English [Term?], from Old French mine, from Late Latin mina, from Gaulish (compare to Welsh mwyn, Irish mianach (“ore”)), from Proto-Celtic *meinis (“ore, metal”).

Original Wiktionary entry and references ↗
mineEnglish (en) · Etymology 2Source text

From Middle English [Term?], from Old French mine, from Late Latin mina, from Gaulish (compare to Welsh mwyn, Irish mianach (“ore”)), from Proto-Celtic *meinis (“ore, metal”).

Original Wiktionary entry and references ↗
mineEnglish (en) · Etymology 3Source text

From Wiktionary contributors; extracted by Tatu Ylonen / Wiktextract / Kaikki.org. Extraction source · CC-BY-SA-4.0. Selected source text is reformatted for display; language and section identity are retained.

Source dump: 2026-10-01 · Extraction: 2026-10-30. These dates identify a dump snapshot, not an individual page revision.

Snapshot checksums and coverage
SOURCE SHA-256
5ff2c072f8099f2d2ce484bd6957bf179f046d2ad37bc36555edf8bb84cb5291
CORPUS SHA-256
c4c2a77325141846709230e11c2959332acd630d53e52905b72d36211251b081
IMPORT RUN
73216b9a9b78ed3830994bf853103716f5a4dc57099e371e9f8fdc468facca26
SUBSET SELECTION
English-only: shortest normalized query first, then binary lexical order; complete word-language and case-variant groups only. This is a bounded online subset, not the full acquired corpus.

INDEPENDENT SOURCE LIBRARY

More sources for this spelling

These are spelling matches, not a claim of identical senses or agreement. Historical accounts retain their own editions and limits; none is automatically promoted into reviewed ancestry.

Browse the independently attributed sources →
20REVIEWED RESULTS
3WORD DOSSIERS
3HISTORICAL NODES
2SOURCES
9CLAIMS
3WITNESSES
01

MODERN ENTRY POINTS

WORD DOSSIERS

3
02

ATTESTED / RECONSTRUCTED / BOUNDARY

HISTORICAL FORMS

3
03

WHERE INTERPRETATION IS TESTED

CLAIMS & DISPUTES

9

SCHOLARLY DISPUTES / 8

openprobableposition text

Does the Luke lexical swap resolve the remaining 21 noun-participle candidates?

No. Luke 1:71 and 6:27 show that fijan and hatan can exchange the work of enemies and those hating, but those two contextual alignments do not determine every other fijand- token.

openprobableposition text

Does Galatians 5:20 prove hatis always meant explosive anger?

No single verse can establish an invariant meaning. Galatians aligns plural hatiza with Greek thumoi, while other biblical contexts use orgē and Ephesians 4:31 does not permit a clean one-to-one choice. The exact semantic center of ordinary Gothic remains underdetermined by translation texts.

openproposedposition text

Are Germanic hate words unquestionably cognate with κῆδος?

No. The formal comparison is prominent enough to traverse, but the sources explicitly qualify the semantic path and do not recover one shared original sense.

resolvedestablishedposition text

Does every modern Feind literally mean one who hates?

No. The participial source is historical morphology. Modern Duden senses include personal enemy, hostile power or force, and a determined opponent of something without requiring a recoverable emotion in every token.

resolvedestablishedposition text

Does the etymology prove that every enemy truly hates?

No. Historical word formation does not determine the psychology of every referent. The corpus includes singular, plural, religious, military, and collective opponents.

resolvedestablishedposition text

Do the chess, card, and supremacy senses reveal the original meaning of king?

No. The inherited ruler title is older; the game-piece and preeminence senses are semantic extensions documented in the modern entry.

resolvedestablishedposition text

Did nice originally mean pleasant?

No. Merriam-Webster reports early foolish, wanton, silly, and simple senses; pleasant or agreeable becomes prominent much later.

resolvedestablishedposition text

Did trust begin as a legal property arrangement?

No. The historical noun centers on confidence and reliance; legal trust is one later semantic institution within the word’s wider range.

CONTRARIAN TRUTHS / 1

RANK 22GRADE Aranked reveal

Kind is not kin with a d—and kindness did not begin as niceness.

Kind and kin descend through separate Germanic formations and meet only at the deeper birth root. The adjective first carries natural, native, fitting, and proper senses; benevolence becomes prominent through later semantic development.

04

BOOKS / DICTIONARIES / ARTICLES / DATABASES

SOURCES

2
05

FIRST USES & HISTORICAL OBJECTS

ATTESTATION WITNESSES

3
06

SEARCH IS DISCOVERY, NOT PROOF

EVERY RESULT OPENS A PERMANENT EVIDENCE RECORD.

Matching text only locates a record. It does not raise confidence, settle a dispute, establish cognacy, or turn a source report into direct inspection. Follow the result into its citations and editorial limits.