*SET-U

GRAPH-WIDE SEARCH

MEASURE THE GRAPH ↗

NOT JUST A DICTIONARY LOOKUP

6 EVIDENCE COLLECTIONS

SEARCH
THE GRAPH.

Find a modern word—or search sideways through reconstructed roots, historical forms, meanings, languages, scholars, sources, claims, disputes, and witnesses.

WIKTIONARY VIA KAIKKI / WIKTEXTRACT

Imported dictionary evidence

SOURCE-IMPORTED · UNREVIEWED

These are source reports, not reviewed *SET-U ancestry. A list of templates or numbered etymologies is not an ancestor chain. Scholarly disagreements remain in the original source text.

35,981 English word records · 45,491 etymology sections in this online subset

PARTIAL ENGLISH COVERAGE · FULL CORPUS REMAINS LOCAL

1 source section across 1 headword matching “False”. These are separate from the reviewed results below.

Open the permanent entry for false →
falseEnglish (en) · Unnumbered etymologySource text

From Middle English false, fals, from Old English fals (“false; counterfeit; fraudulent; wrong; mistaken”), from Latin falsus (“counterfeit, false; falsehood”), perfect passive participle of fallō (“deceive”). Reinforced in Middle English by Anglo-Norman and Old French fals, faus. Compare Scots fals, false, Saterland Frisian falsk, German falsch, Dutch vals, Swedish and Danish falsk; all from Latin falsus. Displaced native Middle English les, lese, from Old English lēas (“false”); See lease, leasing. Doublet of faux. The verb is from Middle English falsen, falsien, from Old French falser, from Latin falsō (“falsify”), itself also from falsus; compare French fausser (“to falsify, to distort”).

Original Wiktionary entry and references ↗

From Wiktionary contributors; extracted by Tatu Ylonen / Wiktextract / Kaikki.org. Extraction source · CC-BY-SA-4.0. Selected source text is reformatted for display; language and section identity are retained.

Source dump: 2026-10-01 · Extraction: 2026-10-30. These dates identify a dump snapshot, not an individual page revision.

Snapshot checksums and coverage
SOURCE SHA-256
5ff2c072f8099f2d2ce484bd6957bf179f046d2ad37bc36555edf8bb84cb5291
CORPUS SHA-256
c4c2a77325141846709230e11c2959332acd630d53e52905b72d36211251b081
IMPORT RUN
73216b9a9b78ed3830994bf853103716f5a4dc57099e371e9f8fdc468facca26
SUBSET SELECTION
English-only: shortest normalized query first, then binary lexical order; complete word-language and case-variant groups only. This is a bounded online subset, not the full acquired corpus.

INDEPENDENT SOURCE LIBRARY

More sources for this spelling

These are spelling matches, not a claim of identical senses or agreement. Historical accounts retain their own editions and limits; none is automatically promoted into reviewed ancestry.

Browse the independently attributed sources →
22REVIEWED RESULTS
5WORD DOSSIERS
1HISTORICAL NODES
0SOURCES
16CLAIMS
0WITNESSES
01

MODERN ENTRY POINTS

WORD DOSSIERS

5
noun · verbcontrarian claim

dialogue

Conversation, represented speech, or an exchange of ideas; inherited through medieval French and Latin from a Greek speaking-family.

OPEN THE FULL LINEAGE ↗
verbhistorical form

feign

To invent, fabricate, make a likeness, or pretend; borrowed through Anglo-French from Latin fingere, to shape or fashion.

OPEN THE FULL LINEAGE ↗
Old Frisian weak verbdossier summary

hatia

Old Frisian hatia is a weak verb whose lexicographic field extends beyond an inward feeling. Hofmann and Popkema give hate or reject, damage, and a feud-language expression for harming or pursuing someone as an enemy. A May 2026 Corpus Oudfries search for word or lemma hatia returns six records in 235,462 tokens, but those are not six instances of this verb. Buma's critical note on Brokmer B 101 explicitly identifies its written hatia as atia "rear" with prothetic h, and Nijdam translates the passage as a poor mother being unable to feed her children. That token is excluded from the hate lineage. The five relevant corpus records occur in legal, road, family, and theological contexts: forms hatijen, hatie, hata, and hatien can concern harming or hindering on a road, a writing or event going against someone, or God hating perjury, lying speech, and false witnesses. The current corpus count is a bounded research surface, not a frequency estimate for medieval speech or a claim about every surviving witness. The underlying manuscripts were not directly inspected for this dossier, no earliest-use claim is made, and no exact historical pronunciation is invented.

OPEN THE FULL LINEAGE ↗
Old Saxon masculine i-stem noundossier summary

heti

Old Saxon heti is an attested noun, not a reconstructed Proto-Germanic form. Köbler prints the normalized citation form hėti* with a trailing asterisk, then gives three cited lexical loci whose inflections produce five witness readings: accusative singular heti at Heliand 1322 in manuscripts M, C, and V; dative singular heti at Genesis 60; and genitive singular hetias in the tenth-century Saxon Confession. No nominative singular appears in that inventory, but the exact surface heti is visibly written in Munich Cgm 25. The directly inspected Heliand line places the noun in the Beatitudes, where righteous people endure rîkioro manno heti endi harmquidi, powerful men's hostility or persecution and hostile speech. The Saxon Confession instead places hetias beside malice, envy, and slander among confessed wrongs. Those contexts establish a range broader than one private feeling without proving that persecution was the prehistoric root meaning. Fulk and Köbler analyze the Old Saxon comparison as an i-stem; Pfeifer describes the wider Germanic noun as an old es/os-stem, so the inherited morphological account remains public rather than falsely harmonized.

OPEN THE FULL LINEAGE ↗
nouncontrarian claim

kayık

The Turkish word for a small boat, continued from Old Turkic kayguk and analyzed within an internal Turkic history rather than the Inuit qayaq family.

OPEN THE FULL LINEAGE ↗
02

ATTESTED / RECONSTRUCTED / BOUNDARY

HISTORICAL FORMS

1
03

WHERE INTERPRETATION IS TESTED

CLAIMS & DISPUTES

16

SCHOLARLY DISPUTES / 12

resolvedestablishedposition text

Is the be- in betroth the verb be?

No. It is the historical prefix bi- or be-, related to Old English bi- or be- and bī “by, near,” not the copular verb.

resolvedestablishedposition text

Are bridegroom and human directly descended from one another?

No. Germanic *gumōn- and Latin homō reflect different earthling formations that meet only at *dhghem-.

resolvedestablishedposition text

Did chthonic begin as a word for hell?

No. The reviewed Greek history begins with khthōn, earth, and khthonios, of the earth; underworld reference is a specialization of what lies below.

resolvedestablishedposition text

Does dialogue etymologically require exactly two speakers?

No. Greek dia- means through, across, or between, not two; both reviewed histories explicitly reject or contradict the two-person restriction.

resolvedestablishedposition text

Did feign originally mean only to lie?

No. Its recorded Middle English field includes make, fabricate, make a likeness, dissemble, and pretend.

resolvedestablishedposition text

Are Fiende, Fiænde, Finde, Fînde, and Fiend separate words?

Not in the reviewed articles. They are treated as surface and scansion variants of the same lexical family.

resolvedprobableposition text

Is fíár in Lokasenna 35 a form of this verb?

Yes in the reviewed normalized text and historical dictionaries: þann er mangi fíár means the one whom no one hates.

resolvedestablishedposition text

Does the 960 poetic date identify the oldest manuscript token?

No. It is a source-reported composition date. Surviving manuscript copies may be later, and none is directly inspected here.

resolvedestablishedposition text

Are frændi and fjándi cognates because they are paired and rhyme?

No. They descend from different Germanic verb families. Their Old Norse pairing is rhetorical and semantic, not genealogical.

resolvedestablishedposition text

Are frēond and fēond cognates because Old English pairs them?

No. OED calls fiend an antonym with a similar formation, while the reviewed graph traces the nouns to different love and hate bases. Bosworth–Toller’s pair is rhetorical evidence, not genealogy.

resolvedestablishedposition text

Does the fiógaþ manuscript variant establish exact Old English pronunciation?

No. A spelling variant supports textual variation but does not by itself fix one phonetic value across dialects, periods, and inflections.

resolvedestablishedposition text

Do all printed spellings represent separate lexemes?

No. ONW groups fiunt, dfiunt, fiundis, fiundes, fiunda, uiande, uiende, fiundo, fiundun, fiundum, uiandan, and viannden inside one lemma and inflection table, while flagging individual readings.

CONTRARIAN TRUTHS / 4

RANK 44GRADE Aranked reveal

One corpus hit written hatia is not the hate verb at all.

The May 2026 Corpus Oudfries search returns six records under word or lemma hatia, but spelling alone creates a trap. In Brokmer B 101, Buma explicitly identifies hatia as atia "rear" with prothetic h; Nijdam's translation confirms a poor mother unable to feed her children. That token is excluded from the hate lineage. The five relevant records then reveal the genuine verb's own range: harm or hindrance on an army road, legal adversity, and God hating perjury, lying speech, and false witnesses. The contrarian truth is therefore philological twice over: one identical surface belongs elsewhere, while the inherited verb itself extends beyond private feeling.

RANK 71GRADE Aranked reveal

Dialogue never meant “speech limited to two.”

Greek dia- means through, across, or between. Confusing it with the numeral prefix di- produced a durable but false restriction.

RANK 76GRADE Acontrarian claim

The perfect-looking boat cognate is false.

Greenlandic qajaq and Turkish kayık resemble one another and name similar craft, but their documented prehistories separate into Proto-Eskimo and Old Turkic.

RANK 143GRADE Acontrarian claim

Salary is truly salt's cousin—and the famous story is still false.

Salt and salary meet in the inherited salt family. Real kinship does not prove Roman soldiers received ordinary wages in literal salt.

04

BOOKS / DICTIONARIES / ARTICLES / DATABASES

SOURCES

0

No reviewed record in this collection contains “false.” Absence describes this graph, not all of linguistic scholarship.

05

FIRST USES & HISTORICAL OBJECTS

ATTESTATION WITNESSES

0

No reviewed record in this collection contains “false.” Absence describes this graph, not all of linguistic scholarship.

06

SEARCH IS DISCOVERY, NOT PROOF

EVERY RESULT OPENS A PERMANENT EVIDENCE RECORD.

Matching text only locates a record. It does not raise confidence, settle a dispute, establish cognacy, or turn a source report into direct inspection. Follow the result into its citations and editorial limits.