*SET-U

GRAPH-WIDE SEARCH

MEASURE THE GRAPH ↗

NOT JUST A DICTIONARY LOOKUP

6 EVIDENCE COLLECTIONS

SEARCH
THE GRAPH.

Find a modern word—or search sideways through reconstructed roots, historical forms, meanings, languages, scholars, sources, claims, disputes, and witnesses.

WIKTIONARY VIA KAIKKI / WIKTEXTRACT

Imported dictionary evidence

SOURCE-IMPORTED · UNREVIEWED

These are source reports, not reviewed *SET-U ancestry. A list of templates or numbered etymologies is not an ancestor chain. Scholarly disagreements remain in the original source text.

35,981 English word records · 45,491 etymology sections in this online subset

PARTIAL ENGLISH COVERAGE · FULL CORPUS REMAINS LOCAL

No exact match for “Dispute” in this partial English subset. That does not mean the full research corpus—or linguistic scholarship—has no record. Check the original dictionary entry ↗

From Wiktionary contributors; extracted by Tatu Ylonen / Wiktextract / Kaikki.org. Extraction source · CC-BY-SA-4.0. Selected source text is reformatted for display; language and section identity are retained.

Source dump: 2026-10-01 · Extraction: 2026-10-30. These dates identify a dump snapshot, not an individual page revision.

Snapshot checksums and coverage
SOURCE SHA-256
5ff2c072f8099f2d2ce484bd6957bf179f046d2ad37bc36555edf8bb84cb5291
CORPUS SHA-256
c4c2a77325141846709230e11c2959332acd630d53e52905b72d36211251b081
IMPORT RUN
73216b9a9b78ed3830994bf853103716f5a4dc57099e371e9f8fdc468facca26
SUBSET SELECTION
English-only: shortest normalized query first, then binary lexical order; complete word-language and case-variant groups only. This is a bounded online subset, not the full acquired corpus.

INDEPENDENT SOURCE LIBRARY

More sources for this spelling

These are spelling matches, not a claim of identical senses or agreement. Historical accounts retain their own editions and limits; none is automatically promoted into reviewed ancestry.

Browse the independently attributed sources →
WIKTIONARY / SOURCE LOOKUPEXTERNAL · COMMUNITY EDITED

Dispute

No extractable etymology was found for this exact spelling. Open the original dictionary entry ↗

Read the complete entry and references ↗ · Contribute a cited dossier

44REVIEWED RESULTS
12WORD DOSSIERS
12HISTORICAL NODES
0SOURCES
20CLAIMS
0WITNESSES
01

MODERN ENTRY POINTS

WORD DOSSIERS

12
noun combining formhistorical form

-logy

A bound English word element used in formations involving discourse or expression and in names of doctrines, theories, sciences, and fields of study.

OPEN THE FULL LINEAGE ↗
noundossier summary

boy

A male child or young man; Middle English also used the word for a male servant or churl, and its origin remains disputed.

OPEN THE FULL LINEAGE ↗
nounhistorical form

calculator

A person or device that calculates, inherited from a medieval human-reckoner word and the Latin counting-pebble family.

OPEN THE FULL LINEAGE ↗
nouncontrarian claim

calculus

A mathematical system, a method of reasoning, or a bodily stone; borrowed from a Latin word for a pebble used in counting.

OPEN THE FULL LINEAGE ↗
nouncontrarian claim

chá

The Portuguese word for tea, a European cha-type form associated with sixteenth-century Portuguese contact through Macao rather than the Dutch te-type route.

OPEN THE FULL LINEAGE ↗
nounhistorical form

conscience

The moral sense or awareness of one's conduct, inherited through medieval French from the Latin knowing-family.

OPEN THE FULL LINEAGE ↗
adjective · nounhistorical form

conscious

Aware, awake, or deliberate; borrowed directly from Latin conscius in the knowing-family.

OPEN THE FULL LINEAGE ↗
noun · verbhistorical form

dialogue

Conversation, represented speech, or an exchange of ideas; inherited through medieval French and Latin from a Greek speaking-family.

OPEN THE FULL LINEAGE ↗
Old Dutch masculine noundossier summary

fīunt

Old Dutch fīunt is the normalized headword behind a twenty-six-occurrence historical-dictionary record for enemy or opponent. ONW classifies the noun as synchronically unsegmented but says it was originally the present participle of the verb corresponding to Old High German fīēn and Gothic fijan, a verb no longer known in Dutch. Its frequency table preserves six case-number cells: nominative and genitive singular plus nominative, genitive, dative, and accusative plural. Those are not a complete paradigm. The article displays twenty representative location blocks after warning that locations in the semantic profile have been reduced. Most early Wachtendonck Psalms material is linguistically dated 901–1000 but survives in copies dated 1595–1605, circa 1598, or 1701–1800; no tenth-century manuscript object was inspected. One dfiunt or fiunt gloss aligned with Latin diabolus is textually disputed, and one Groningen psalm gloss is explicitly assigned to Old Frisian by the dictionary. This dossier therefore treats fīunt as a nominal fossil with a partially preserved inflectional record, not as a productive Old Dutch participle or a complete transparent paradigm.

OPEN THE FULL LINEAGE ↗
Old Norse weak verbdossier summary

hata

Old Norse hata is not only a medieval label for an inward feeling. The Dictionary of Old Norse Prose structures 101 prose citations under four active senses before its participial and reflexive branches: persecute; despise, reject, or cast aside; mock or humiliate; and hate, despise, or stand hostile toward. That ordering is a lexicographic analysis, not a chronology of semantic change. Fritzner independently begins with pursue or seek to destroy, continues through damage or destruction, and only then gives hate opposed to love. Zoëga likewise preserves poetic damage or destruction beside ordinary hate, while Cleasby and Vigfússon record active, reflexive, reciprocal, participial, and disputed poetic uses. Lexicon Poeticum displays eleven linked rows, including variants, damage, destruction, persecution, loathing, haters, and the gold-spending formula, but warns that its concordance has not been reviewed and that dates need checking. A c1200 scan of Holm perg 15 4°, folio 89v, was directly inspected against ONP's diplomatic transcription and visibly preserves hata in the line Elſcaþu hréinlife oc hata engi maɴ. All other rows remain source-reported. The generated possible runic inscriptions on modern dictionary transcriptions are excluded, and no exact historical pronunciation is invented.

OPEN THE FULL LINEAGE ↗
Gothic class-I weak-verb lemmacontrarian claim

hatjan

A Gothic weak verb meaning hate, represented by exactly one verified corpus token: the present participle hatjandam in Matthew 5:44. Project Wulfila lemmatizes that token as class-I hatjan, while the parallel Luke 6:27 command uses class-III hatandans from hatan. Braune treats the two shapes as conjugational fluctuation; Orel and the current corpus keep distinct formations visible. The normalized infinitive, the written participle, and the reconstructed parent are therefore never collapsed.

OPEN THE FULL LINEAGE ↗
Old Norse noun, chiefly neuterdossier summary

hatr

An Old Norse noun for hatred, enmity, or spite. The University of Copenhagen Dictionary of Old Norse Prose gives the main neuter entry 54 citations, while a separately analyzed masculine entry has only one citation and is flagged as possibly an elementary error. The neuter corpus also contains one cautiously proposed mockery or scorn sense aligned with Latin irrisio. A c.1150-1200 manuscript visibly preserves Hatr in a line ONP transcribes Hatr hafa þeir engla and aligns with Latin Odium. The reviewed ancestry joins the Germanic *hatiz- family, preserves the disputed *ḱh₂d-es- and *ḱeh₂d- comparison, and then stops.

OPEN THE FULL LINEAGE ↗
02

ATTESTED / RECONSTRUCTED / BOUNDARY

HISTORICAL FORMS

12
●
Old Dutch / Indo-European

fīunt

enemy or opponent; one disputed gloss may denote the Devil

DATE
Old Dutch; oldest corpus range 901–1000, later records through 1200
MATCH
gloss
DOSSIERS
1
●
Old Dutch / Indo-European

fīunt / fīant

enemy or opponent; one disputed record may denote the Devil

DATE
Old Dutch
MATCH
gloss
DOSSIERS
2
∅
Beyond secure reconstruction

UNKNOWN

No securely reviewed ancestor beyond this disputed comparison

DATE
before the proposed *skei- analysis
MATCH
gloss
DOSSIERS
1
∅
Beyond secure reconstruction

UNKNOWN

No securely reviewed ancestor beyond this disputed comparison

DATE
before the proposed *skei- analysis
MATCH
gloss
DOSSIERS
1
∅
Beyond secure reconstruction

UNKNOWN

No securely reviewed ancestor beyond the disputed comparison.

DATE
before the proposed *skei- analysis
MATCH
gloss
DOSSIERS
1
∅
Beyond secure reconstruction

UNKNOWN

The ultimate ancestry of the Evenki word is disputed.

DATE
before Evenki šamān
MATCH
gloss
DOSSIERS
1
∅
Beyond secure reconstruction

UNKNOWN

The dossier stops at a live etymological dispute.

DATE
before the competing Mapuche and Spanish analyses
MATCH
gloss
DOSSIERS
1
∅
Beyond secure reconstruction

UNKNOWN

No deeper ancestor is promoted beyond the live *leǵ- / *sleǵ- dispute.

DATE
before the disputed gather reconstruction
MATCH
gloss
DOSSIERS
1
∅
Beyond secure reconstruction

UNKNOWN

No single deeper ancestor is selected beyond the disputed calculus and calx analysis.

DATE
before the disputed Latin stone route
MATCH
gloss
DOSSIERS
1
∅
Beyond secure reconstruction

UNKNOWN

No deeper ancestor is promoted beyond the live *leǵ- / *sleǵ- dispute.

DATE
before the disputed gather reconstruction
MATCH
gloss
DOSSIERS
1
∅
Beyond secure reconstruction

UNKNOWN

No securely reviewed ancestor is promoted beyond the disputed cutting-and-discerning comparison.

DATE
before the disputed *skei- analysis
MATCH
gloss
DOSSIERS
1
∅
Beyond secure reconstruction

UNKNOWN

No securely reviewed ancestor is promoted beyond the disputed cutting-and-discerning comparison.

DATE
before the disputed *skei- analysis
MATCH
gloss
DOSSIERS
1
03

WHERE INTERPRETATION IS TESTED

CLAIMS & DISPUTES

20

SCHOLARLY DISPUTES / 12

openproposedposition text

Do Celtic cais and Greek κῆδος prove that love and hate share one root?

No. They belong to a disputed wider comparison. Middle Irish cais carries a striking love-and-hatred field, but that does not make German Liebe an ancestor or cognate of Hass.

openproposedposition text

Is *kad-t/si- from *kad- the only defensible deeper analysis?

No. It is a published proposal, not an attested sequence, and the wider cross-branch set remains semantically disputed.

openproposedposition text

Does knowing securely descend from cutting or splitting?

No. The *skei- comparison is published, but the exact formation of Latin scīre and the semantic bridge from separating to knowing remain disputed.

openproposedposition text

Is hostile pursuit the securely recovered original meaning?

Not beyond dispute. DWB calls it original and Duden independently notes pursue, but the surviving examples, the exact weak-verb reconstruction, and the deeper comparison do not recover one prehistoric scene with certainty.

openproposedposition text

Did Middle English hate directly continue Old English hete?

Possibly, but the immediate route is disputed. American Heritage gives direct noun descent; Merriam-Webster says the noun was probably derived from haten and replaced hete.

openprobableposition text

How does hatizōn relate to Gothic hatjan and hatan?

The reviewed sources distinguish class-II hatizōn, class-I hatjan, and class-III hatan. Hatis clearly supports two denominatives, while the precise historical relationship among all three verb systems remains disputed.

openproposedposition text

Did the noun hate directly continue Old English hete?

The inherited noun is part of the history, but the immediate path is disputed. American Heritage presents Middle English hate from Old English hete; Merriam-Webster says the Middle English noun was probably derived from haten and replaced hete.

openproposedposition text

Did Middle English hate directly continue Old English hete?

Possibly, but the immediate route is disputed. American Heritage gives direct descent; Merriam-Webster says the noun was probably derived from haten and replaced hete.

openestablishedposition text

Does the threat-whet route unveil the word's one true nature as sharpened hostility?

No. That is an evocative modern paraphrase, not an attested ancient definition. The route itself is disputed, and the visible contexts establish hostile disposition or intent without recovering prehistoric consciousness.

openproposedposition text

Did Latin lēx originally mean a “collection of rules”?

That semantic bridge and the deeper gather-root connection are plausible published analyses, not an uncontested fact. The root shape *leǵ- versus *sleǵ- is also disputed.

openproposedposition text

Does Latin lēx securely descend from the gather root *leǵ-?

Not securely. A collection-of-rules bridge is plausible and published, but the direction, root shape, and precise cognates remain disputed.

openproposedposition text

Is poncho securely Mapuche or Spanish?

It remains disputed. A major English dictionary and Sánchez support Mapuche ancestry; current RAE and Iwasaki advance a Spanish-internal analysis grounded partly in an early 1530 record.

CONTRARIAN TRUTHS / 8

RANK 20GRADE Aranked reveal

King is a kin-word, not a royal word.

English king continues Old English cyning and Germanic *kuninga-, built on the kin or lineage base *kunja-. Latin rēx, royal, and regal belong to a different root—and even “leader of the kin” overstates the disputed original Germanic sense.

RANK 29GRADE Aranked reveal

One Gothic hate verb survives once—in a command to do good to those who hate you.

Project Wulfila’s only verified hatjan token is hatjandam in Matthew 5:44, directly visible on Codex Argenteus folio 3v. A parallel “love your enemies” command in Luke 6:27 instead uses hatandans from class-III hatan. The translation gloss “hate” therefore hides a genuine grammatical and historical dispute.

RANK 31GRADE Aranked reveal

Gothic’s two hate verbs trade places across two passages.

The complete surviving hatan corpus contains only hatandane in Luke 1:71 and hatandans in Luke 6:27. In Luke 1, fijandam supplies enemies while hatandane supplies those hating; in Luke 6, hatandans supplies enemies while fijandam supplies those hating. Both Codex Argenteus pages are directly inspected. The lexical swap—and the class-III versus class-I dispute—cannot be represented by one timeless translation arrow.

RANK 47GRADE Aranked reveal

The Old Dutch enemy noun outlived the hate verb that created it.

ONW counts twenty-six fīunt occurrences across six attested case-number cells, yet classifies the noun as synchronically unsegmented and says the corresponding hate verb is no longer known in Dutch. Comparative evidence reconstructs the noun as an old present-participial formation: the hating one. The grammar therefore preserves a fossil in nominative, genitive, dative, and accusative records after Dutch lost the living verb that once made the formation transparent. Six cells are evidence, not a complete paradigm; the early Psalms records survive in later copies; and the lone Devil gloss is disputed.

RANK 196GRADE Branked reveal

The Finnish icon may be an ancient import.

A published proposal derives Proto-Finnic *sakna from a reconstructed Germanic pile or stack word through the heated stone pile of an early sauna stove. The edge remains visibly disputed.

RANK 202GRADE Bcontrarian claim

Boy may reach ox—but only through a disputed trail.

One proposal runs from a fettered person through a shackle, restraint collar, ox hide, and ox; another major reference says the origin is unknown.

RANK 211GRADE A−ranked reveal

Higher mathematics began with a pebble.

Latin calculus named a counting-board pebble and a calculation. Its deeper stone ancestry is still disputed between a limestone derivation and a possible shared Mediterranean substrate source.

RANK 212GRADE A−ranked reveal

Logic and -logy are the same word family.

Both return to Greek λόγος; even the deeper “gather” root has a live reconstruction dispute.

04

BOOKS / DICTIONARIES / ARTICLES / DATABASES

SOURCES

0

No reviewed record in this collection contains “dispute.” Absence describes this graph, not all of linguistic scholarship.

05

FIRST USES & HISTORICAL OBJECTS

ATTESTATION WITNESSES

0

No reviewed record in this collection contains “dispute.” Absence describes this graph, not all of linguistic scholarship.

06

SEARCH IS DISCOVERY, NOT PROOF

EVERY RESULT OPENS A PERMANENT EVIDENCE RECORD.

Matching text only locates a record. It does not raise confidence, settle a dispute, establish cognacy, or turn a source report into direct inspection. Follow the result into its citations and editorial limits.