WITNESS / 64
ALL WITNESSES ↗PERMANENT ATTESTATION RECORDWITNESS / 64
OBJECT
BEFORE
CLAIM.
THE IMAGE WAS CHECKED.
The facsimile pixels were directly inspected against Project Wulfila's verse-level transcription. The object verifies inflected liuba in Mark 1:11, not a written nominative liufs; 510 remains a representative point within the official early-sixth-century manuscript dating.
Gothicearly 6th centuryprobable
liufs
Codex Argenteus, Mark 1:11
“þu is sunus meins sa liuba”
- WITNESS TYPE
- Manuscript
- YEAR
- 510
- LOCATOR
- Codex Argenteus DG 1, fol. 57v, facsimile 276, Mark 1:11, line containing “sa liuba”
- REPOSITORY
- Uppsala University Library
- SHELFMARK / OBJECT ID
- DG 1, fol. 57v
- FACSIMILE
- Linked below
- DIRECT INSPECTION
- Yes
- CONFIDENCE
- probable
WORD DOSSIERliufs ↗
CANONICAL FORM NODENODE 300 ↗
INSPECTED FACSIMILEOPEN OBJECT ↗
01
REPEATABLE VISUAL REVIEW
THE INSPECTION LEDGER
OBSERVED FORMliuba
“þu is sunus meins sa liuba”
- INSPECTION DATE
- 2026-08-26
- METHOD
- visual facsimile
- INSPECTOR ROLE
- SET-U editorial review
- EXACT LOCATOR
- Codex Argenteus DG 1, fol. 57v, facsimile 276, Mark 1:11, line containing “sa liuba”
- CLAIM LIMIT
- Verifies the inflected manuscript token liuba at Mark 1:11 when the image is aligned with the verse transcription. It does not show the normalized citation form liufs as a written token.
02
BIBLIOGRAPHIC PROVENANCE
THE SOURCE BEHIND THE CLAIM
- TITLE
- Codex Argenteus facsimile 276 — folio 57v, Mark 1:6–13
- AUTHOR
- Uppsala University Library; Project Codex Argenteus Online
- YEAR
- 1927
- PUBLISHER
- Project Codex Argenteus Online
- SOURCE TYPE
- digitized primary source
- CITATION KEY
- codex-argenteus-57v