*SET-U

WITNESS / 250

ALL WITNESSES ↗
PERMANENT ATTESTATION RECORDWITNESS / 250

OBJECT
BEFORE
CLAIM.

SOURCE-REPORTED ATTESTATION

THE PRIMARY OBJECT WAS NOT CHECKED.

Project Wulfila reports the token as morphosyntactically ambiguous and not directly verified here. Historical grammars treat it as a genitive problem; the record does not relabel the visible hatis as a nominative simply because the form is syncretic.

GothicGothic manuscript corpus, date not normalizedprobable

hatis

Codex Ambrosianus B corpus record, Ephesians 2:3

“barna hatis”
WITNESS TYPE
Source-reported corpus record
YEAR
Not fixed
LOCATOR
Ephesians 2:3 [B], barna hatis
REPOSITORY
Not recorded
SHELFMARK / OBJECT ID
Not recorded
FACSIMILE
Not linked
DIRECT INSPECTION
No
CONFIDENCE
probable
01

BIBLIOGRAPHIC PROVENANCE

THE SOURCE BEHIND THE CLAIM

TITLE
Gothic Bible word analysis — Ephesians 2:3, hatize and hatis
AUTHOR
Project Wulfila editors · Wilhelm Streitberg
YEAR
2026
PUBLISHER
Project Wulfila · University of Antwerp
SOURCE TYPE
research database
CITATION KEY
wulfila-ephesians-2-3-hatis