WITNESS / 248
ALL WITNESSES ↗PERMANENT ATTESTATION RECORDWITNESS / 248
OBJECT
BEFORE
CLAIM.
THE IMAGE WAS CHECKED.
The facsimile pixels were directly inspected against Project Wulfila’s verse transcription and the historical line locator. The object verifies written hatiza in the wrath-to-come clause; it does not by itself settle the case analysis, establish a first Gothic use, or prove that hatis was the only Gothic wrath noun.
Gothicearly 6th centuryestablished
hatis
Codex Argenteus, Luke 3:7
“þliuhan faura þamma anawairþin hatiza”
- WITNESS TYPE
- Manuscript
- YEAR
- 510
- LOCATOR
- DG 1, fol. 129r; facsimile 157; Luke 3:7; line 10 ending “anawairþin hatiza”
- REPOSITORY
- Uppsala University Library
- SHELFMARK / OBJECT ID
- DG 1, fol. 129r
- FACSIMILE
- Linked below
- DIRECT INSPECTION
- Yes
- CONFIDENCE
- established
WORD DOSSIERhatis ↗
CANONICAL FORM NODENODE 1143 ↗
INSPECTED FACSIMILEOPEN OBJECT ↗
01
REPEATABLE VISUAL REVIEW
THE INSPECTION LEDGER
OBSERVED FORMhatiza
“þliuhan faura þamma anawairþin hatiza”
- INSPECTION DATE
- 2026-08-27
- METHOD
- visual facsimile
- INSPECTOR ROLE
- SET-U editorial review
- EXACT LOCATOR
- Codex Argenteus DG 1, fol. 129r, facsimile 157, Luke 3:7, line 10 ending “anawairþin hatiza”
- CLAIM LIMIT
- Verifies the manuscript glyph sequence transcribed hatiza when the page is aligned with the verse transcription and line locator. It does not independently determine the case ending, prove the normalized lemma hatis was written elsewhere, establish a first Gothic use, or recover the noun’s prehistoric meaning.
02
BIBLIOGRAPHIC PROVENANCE
THE SOURCE BEHIND THE CLAIM
- TITLE
- Codex Argenteus facsimile 157 — folio 129r, Luke 3:5–9
- AUTHOR
- Uppsala University Library · Project Codex Argenteus Online
- YEAR
- 1927
- PUBLISHER
- Project Codex Argenteus Online
- SOURCE TYPE
- digitized primary source
- CITATION KEY
- codex-argenteus-129r