*SET-U

PERMANENT SOURCE RECORD

ALL SOURCES ↗
BIBLIOGRAPHIC IDENTITYlwl-heliand-cgm25-transcription

SOURCE
RECORD.

One work. Every claim that depends on it. No citation without a consequence you can inspect.

CLAIM-LEVEL USAGE

12 PUBLIC LINKS INTO THE GRAPH.

This count excludes duplicate dossier-path citations. Open the claims below to see exactly how the source is used.

digital scholarly editionlwl-heliand-cgm25-transcription

Heliand Cgm 25 transcription after Schmeller 1830 with Sievers 1878 verse numbering

AUTHOR / EDITOR
Johann Andreas Schmeller · Eduard Sievers · Landschaftsverband Westfalen-Lippe
YEAR
1830
PUBLISHER
Landschaftsverband Westfalen-Lippe
DOI
Not recorded
SOURCE TYPE
digital scholarly edition
EXTERNAL RECORD
OPEN ORIGINAL ↗
0CANONICAL EDGES
0WITNESSES
0COMPARISONS
0CONTEXT LINKS
3RANKED REVEALS
6DISPUTES
3JOURNEY STAGES
3WORD DOSSIERS
01

CONTRARIAN TRUTH CLAIMS

RANKED REVEALS THAT CITE THIS SOURCE

3
RANK 48GRADE Acontext

Old Saxon hate crosses from verb into enemy noun inside one manuscript locus.

Köbler assigns hatōn four cited loci, but the evidence is not four neat tokens. Heliand 1451 alone varies between Munich hatan and Cotton haton. At Heliand 4915, Munich hatandiero and Cotton hettendero are indexed twice: under the verb as present-participial forms and under hėttiand as the lexicalized agent noun enemy. The Munich hatan and hatandiero pixels are directly inspected. The reveal is therefore grammatical, not mystical: one written formation sits at the boundary between haters and enemies. It does not prove that every enemy hates, that pursue was the first meaning, or that the four-locus dictionary count represents four manuscripts.

*ḱeh₂d-

*ḱeh₂d- → *ḱh₂d-es- → *hatiz- → *xatēnan ~ *xatōjanan → hatan → hatōn

Heliand 1451 and 4915 transcription contexts

Places both readings inside their line-level narrative environments.

RANK 49GRADE Acontext

The token is attested even though the dictionary headword wears an asterisk.

Köbler heads the Old Saxon noun hėti* but lists written accusative and dative heti plus genitive hetias beneath it. The exact Munich Heliand token is directly visible in the clause rîkioro manno heti endi harmquidi. The dictionary count three also hides a second distinction: it means three lexical loci, while Heliand 1322 survives with M, C, and V readings, producing five reported witness readings across the dossier. The star therefore belongs to an editorial headword layer; it does not erase the attested surface or turn Old Saxon into Proto-Germanic. The visible Heliand context is endured hostility or persecution, while the Saxon Confession groups hetias with malice, envy, and slander. Even the inherited grammar stays open: Fulk and Köbler use an i-stem analysis, whereas Pfeifer calls the wider noun an old es/os-stem.

*ḱeh₂d-

*ḱeh₂d- → *ḱh₂d-es- → *hatiz- → heti

Heliand lines 1299–1325

Places the visible token inside the Beatitudes passage.

RANK 50GRADE Acontext

The hostile adjective may belong to whet and threat, not hate—and its starred lemma still has a nominative.

Köbler's Old Saxon entry reports five written readings at three Heliand loci, including nominative hotie, huotia, and huoti, yet heads the entry hōti*. The asterisk therefore cannot be explained away as “no nominative survives.” More radically, the sources split at the root. UT groups hōti with hatōn and heti under the inherited hate etymon k̑ād-. Köbler's same entry cross-references hatōn but reconstructs a different *hwōtja- adjective beside *hwōtō “threat” and Pokorny's *kʷē̆d- / *kʷō̆d- family of boring, pricking, sharpening, whetting, and inciting. Munich hotie and hotean are directly visible in contexts of hostile minds and hostile intent; Cotton huotia, huotian, and huoti remain source-reported. The unveiling is not “hostility secretly means sharpened hate.” It is that rigorous etymology sometimes reveals two irreconcilable maps where a flat dictionary would print one arrow.

*kʷē̆d- / *kʷō̆d-

*kʷē̆d- / *kʷō̆d- → *hwōtō → *hwōtja- → hōti

Late Heliand transcription around hotie and hotean

Supplies the complete hostile-mind and hostile-intent contexts.

02

SCHOLARLY DISAGREEMENT

DISPUTE POSITIONS THAT CITE THIS SOURCE

6
opencontextprobable

Did Old Saxon hatōn mean pursue as well as hate?

Köbler lexicographically gives both hassen and verfolgen, so the action range belongs in the record. The four-locus inventory does not by itself assign both readings to every token or establish their chronology.

Heliand 1451 and 4915 contexts

Shows two actual narrative constructions without proving the gloss range for every token.

resolvedcontextestablished

Does every Heliand context simply mean hate?

No. The located contexts concern hostile minds, hostile intent, and a ruler becoming hostile or enraged in mind. Those are compatible with hostility but do not force the modern noun hate into every token.

Late Heliand transcription around hotie and hotean

Provides two complete textual settings.

03

CANONICAL RELATIONSHIP CLAIMS

EDGES THAT CITE THIS SOURCE

0
No canonical ancestry edge currently cites this source.
04

LEXICAL ATTESTATIONS

WITNESSES REPORTED BY THIS SOURCE

0
No lexical witness currently cites this source.
05

COMPARATIVE EVIDENCE

COGNATES, DESCENDANTS, AND RELATIVES

0
No comparative-relative record currently cites this source.
06

GEOGRAPHIC AND TEMPORAL CLAIMS

JOURNEY STAGES THAT CITE THIS SOURCE

3
07

NON-GENEALOGICAL CONNECTIONS

HISTORICAL CONTEXT, KEPT SEPARATE

0
No non-genealogical context link currently cites this source.
08

WORD-FAMILY REUSE

DOSSIERS THAT DEPEND ON THIS SOURCE

3
hatōn3 CLAIM LINKS↗heti4 CLAIM LINKS↗hōti5 CLAIM LINKS↗