*SET-U

PERMANENT SOURCE RECORD

ALL SOURCES ↗
BIBLIOGRAPHIC IDENTITYcorpus-oudfries-about

SOURCE
RECORD.

One work. Every claim that depends on it. No citation without a consequence you can inspect.

CLAIM-LEVEL USAGE

7 PUBLIC LINKS INTO THE GRAPH.

This count excludes duplicate dossier-path citations. Open the claims below to see exactly how the source is used.

research databasecorpus-oudfries-about

Corpus Oudfries — About and version 1.0

AUTHOR / EDITOR
Rita van de Poel · Instituut voor de Nederlandse Taal
YEAR
2026
PUBLISHER
Instituut voor de Nederlandse Taal
DOI
Not recorded
SOURCE TYPE
research database
EXTERNAL RECORD
OPEN ORIGINAL ↗
1CANONICAL EDGES
0WITNESSES
0COMPARISONS
0CONTEXT LINKS
1RANKED REVEALS
4DISPUTES
1JOURNEY STAGES
1WORD DOSSIERS
01

CONTRARIAN TRUTH CLAIMS

RANKED REVEALS THAT CITE THIS SOURCE

1
RANK 44GRADE Acontext

One corpus hit written hatia is not the hate verb at all.

The May 2026 Corpus Oudfries search returns six records under word or lemma hatia, but spelling alone creates a trap. In Brokmer B 101, Buma explicitly identifies hatia as atia "rear" with prothetic h; Nijdam's translation confirms a poor mother unable to feed her children. That token is excluded from the hate lineage. The five relevant records then reveal the genuine verb's own range: harm or hindrance on an army road, legal adversity, and God hating perjury, lying speech, and false witnesses. The contrarian truth is therefore philological twice over: one identical surface belongs elsewhere, while the inherited verb itself extends beyond private feeling.

*ḱeh₂d-

*ḱeh₂d- → *ḱh₂d-es- → *hatiz- → *xatēnan ~ *xatōjanan → hatia

Version 1.0 corpus scope, May 2026

Bounds the search count to the current corpus surface.

hatia dossier ↗truth record ↗89UNVEILING
02

SCHOLARLY DISAGREEMENT

DISPUTE POSITIONS THAT CITE THIS SOURCE

4
openchallengesprobable

Why does Köbler print hatia with an asterisk while corpus forms are visible?

Köbler's sigla mark inferred or unattested representations inside his lexicographic system, while the later corpus surfaces inflected forms hatijen, hatie, hata, and hatien and one misleading hatia homograph. The exact source-base difference remains to be reconciled.

Corpus annotation based on Hofmann and Popkema; searchable word and lemma

Exposes a different later evidence and annotation surface.

hatia dossier ↗dispute record ↗
03

CANONICAL RELATIONSHIP CLAIMS

EDGES THAT CITE THIS SOURCE

1
EDGE 1228contextprobable

hatia → *xatēnan ~ *xatōjanan

Old Frisian → Proto-Germanic · inheritance

SOUND
Old Frisian h corresponds to the Germanic fricative Orel writes x. The attested weak-verb forms show spelling and inflectional variation including hatia, hatijen, hatie, hata, and hatien, but the reviewed sources do not publish one complete dated series of intermediate spoken changes.
MEANING
The inherited hostility verb is used across hate or rejection, damage, feud-language enemy pursuit, road obstruction, legal adversity, and theological condemnation. No dictionary sense order is promoted as a chronological semantic path.
SCHOLAR / EDITOR
Vladimir Orel · Dietrich Hofmann · Anne Tjerk Popkema · Corpus Oudfries editors
Version 1.0 corpus scope and annotation method

Defines the bounded current corpus and its lexicographic annotation basis.

OPEN THE PERMANENT CLAIM ↗
04

LEXICAL ATTESTATIONS

WITNESSES REPORTED BY THIS SOURCE

0
No lexical witness currently cites this source.
05

COMPARATIVE EVIDENCE

COGNATES, DESCENDANTS, AND RELATIVES

0
No comparative-relative record currently cites this source.
06

GEOGRAPHIC AND TEMPORAL CLAIMS

JOURNEY STAGES THAT CITE THIS SOURCE

1
07

NON-GENEALOGICAL CONNECTIONS

HISTORICAL CONTEXT, KEPT SEPARATE

0
No non-genealogical context link currently cites this source.
08

WORD-FAMILY REUSE

DOSSIERS THAT DEPEND ON THIS SOURCE

1
hatia7 CLAIM LINKS↗

1 entry-scoped citations map reviewed dossier paths onto the canonical claims above.