*SET-U

GRAPH-WIDE SEARCH

MEASURE THE GRAPH ↗

NOT JUST A DICTIONARY LOOKUP

6 EVIDENCE COLLECTIONS

SEARCH
THE GRAPH.

Find a modern word—or search sideways through reconstructed roots, historical forms, meanings, languages, scholars, sources, claims, disputes, and witnesses.

WIKTIONARY VIA KAIKKI / WIKTEXTRACT

Imported dictionary evidence

SOURCE-IMPORTED · UNREVIEWED

These are source reports, not reviewed *SET-U ancestry. A list of templates or numbered etymologies is not an ancestor chain. Scholarly disagreements remain in the original source text.

35,981 English word records · 45,491 etymology sections in this online subset

PARTIAL ENGLISH COVERAGE · FULL CORPUS REMAINS LOCAL

No exact match for “mūs” in this partial English subset. That does not mean the full research corpus—or linguistic scholarship—has no record. Check the original dictionary entry ↗

From Wiktionary contributors; extracted by Tatu Ylonen / Wiktextract / Kaikki.org. Extraction source · CC-BY-SA-4.0. Selected source text is reformatted for display; language and section identity are retained.

Source dump: 2026-10-01 · Extraction: 2026-10-30. These dates identify a dump snapshot, not an individual page revision.

Snapshot checksums and coverage
SOURCE SHA-256
5ff2c072f8099f2d2ce484bd6957bf179f046d2ad37bc36555edf8bb84cb5291
CORPUS SHA-256
c4c2a77325141846709230e11c2959332acd630d53e52905b72d36211251b081
IMPORT RUN
73216b9a9b78ed3830994bf853103716f5a4dc57099e371e9f8fdc468facca26
SUBSET SELECTION
English-only: shortest normalized query first, then binary lexical order; complete word-language and case-variant groups only. This is a bounded online subset, not the full acquired corpus.

INDEPENDENT SOURCE LIBRARY

More sources for this spelling

These are spelling matches, not a claim of identical senses or agreement. Historical accounts retain their own editions and limits; none is automatically promoted into reviewed ancestry.

Lewis’s Elementary Latin Dictionary

1890 American Book Company edition; pinned Perseus XML digitization
Browse the independently attributed sources →
28REVIEWED RESULTS
6WORD DOSSIERS
11HISTORICAL NODES
2SOURCES
9CLAIMS
0WITNESSES
01

MODERN ENTRY POINTS

WORD DOSSIERS

6
02

ATTESTED / RECONSTRUCTED / BOUNDARY

HISTORICAL FORMS

11
03

WHERE INTERPRETATION IS TESTED

CLAIMS & DISPUTES

9

SCHOLARLY DISPUTES / 5

resolvedestablishedexact word

Are Greek mouse and muscle merely accidental homonyms?

The reviewed Liddell–Scott entry treats μῦς as one lexical entry with both rodent and body-muscle senses, and Modern Greek explicitly derives both learned senses from Ancient Greek.

resolvedestablishedposition text

Was English mouse borrowed from Latin mūs?

No. Old English mūs continues a Germanic branch; Latin mūs is a cognate parallel branch.

resolvedprobableposition text

How secure is Proto-Indo-European *mūs-?

The cross-branch mouse word is reconstructed as PIE *mūs-, while any deeper ancestor remains outside the reviewed evidence.

resolvedestablishedposition text

Do mussel and muscle share the Latin mouse family?

The English words have distinct immediate histories but converge in the Latin musculus / mūscula family derived from mūs.

CONTRARIAN TRUTHS / 4

RANK 88GRADE Aranked reveal

Mussel and muscle were once spelling twins.

Middle English could spell the shellfish muscle. The shellfish and anatomical words ultimately belong to Latin’s mouse-derived musculus family, though the naming resemblance itself is not fully recoverable.

RANK 149GRADE Aranked reveal

English mouse is not a Latin loan.

English mouse follows its inherited Germanic line while Latin mūs is a cognate branch. Their resemblance reflects common ancestry, not a direct Latin-to-English borrowing.

RANK 168GRADE Aranked reveal

In Greek, a muscle is still a mouse.

Ancient Greek μῦς named both the rodent and a body muscle. Modern Greek μυς preserves the anatomical branch and records the mouse sense as learned vocabulary.

RANK 172GRADE Aranked reveal

A muscle was a “little mouse.”

Latin musculus is a diminutive of mūs “mouse.” The derivation is secure; the exact resemblance mechanism remains qualified.

04

BOOKS / DICTIONARIES / ARTICLES / DATABASES

SOURCES

2
05

FIRST USES & HISTORICAL OBJECTS

ATTESTATION WITNESSES

0

No reviewed record in this collection contains “mūs.” Absence describes this graph, not all of linguistic scholarship.

06

SEARCH IS DISCOVERY, NOT PROOF

EVERY RESULT OPENS A PERMANENT EVIDENCE RECORD.

Matching text only locates a record. It does not raise confidence, settle a dispute, establish cognacy, or turn a source report into direct inspection. Follow the result into its citations and editorial limits.