*SET-U

RECURSIVE ANCESTOR EXPLORER

GLOBAL GRAPH ↗

NORTH-STAR FEATURE / ROOT OF THE ROOT

WORD → PARENT → PARENT → UNKNOWN

GO TO
THE ROOT.

Do not stop at the first ancestor. Follow every cited route—through compounds, reconstructions, and disagreements—until human knowledge actually stops.

START / NODE 1245Old NorseOld Norse poetic record; exact composition dates not fixed here

fjá

Old Norse fjá was a verb meaning to hate. The Dictionary of Old Norse Prose classifies it as poetic and exposes zero prose citations; its glossarium links point to the early form fía and the reconstructed Proto-Germanic *fi(j)ēn-. Cleasby and Vigfússon call the verb obsolete, compare Gothic fijan and Old English feon or fjan, and locate it in Hýmiskviða 22 and Lokasenna 35, with the reflexive fjásk in Skírnismál 33. Fritzner independently gives the same three locations. The normalized verse texts preserve three different grammatical surfaces: goð fjá in Hýmiskviða, mangi fíár in Lokasenna, and Freyr fiásk in Skírnismál. Lexicon Poeticum likewise reports three poetic records, but explicitly warns that its concordance is unreviewed and that dates should be checked. These are source-reported lexical and edited-text records, not directly inspected manuscript objects, and three records in the reviewed poetic concordance are not a census of every Old Norse utterance. The finite verb became a tiny poetic fossil while its inherited participial relative fjándi became the ordinary enemy noun and accumulated 222 citations in ONP's prose corpus. Those corpus totals are not directly frequency-comparable, but the contrast makes the grammatical survival visible. The generated possible runic inscription shown by modern dictionary transcriptions is not historical evidence and is excluded. No historical sound recording exists, so the dossier does not fabricate one exact pronunciation.

“The Old Norse hate verb survives in three reviewed poetic contexts, while its participial relative fjándi became the ordinary enemy noun. The enemy outlived the verb that made it legible.”
OPEN COMPLETE WORD DOSSIER ↗
18CANONICAL NODES
17REVIEWED EDGES
1FIRST PARENT ROUTES
2RECONSTRUCTIONS
14KNOWLEDGE HORIZONS
15EDGE CITATIONS

EVERY REVIEWED PARENT, NOT ONE EDITORIAL PATH

FOLLOW EVERY BRANCH.

Compound components and competing routes stay separate. Every arrow retains its sound change, semantic change, scholar, confidence, and exact sources.

01
PARENT ROUTES1 REVIEWED RELATIONSHIP
EDGE 1219HISTORICAL SURFACE DEVELOPMENTPROBABLE
SOUND CHANGE
The early form fía develops into fjá through North Germanic contraction and glide-vowel remodeling. The reviewed lexical sources publish the earlier and later surfaces but do not expose a dated sequence of intermediate written forms.
SEMANTIC CHANGE
The verb remains in the hate field; active and reflexive constructions distribute the participant structure differently without creating separate prehistoric roots.
SCHOLAR
Geir T. Zoëga · Dictionary of Old Norse Prose editors
CONFIDENCE
probable — Zoëga explicitly calls fía the early form and ONP cross-references item fía. The exact phonetic stages, chronology, and geographic spread are not directly observed.
CHRONOLOGY
An early Old Norse form into the normalized poetic fjá lemma; no exact transition date is asserted.
*

THE ASTERISK IS A PROMISE

RECONSTRUCTION IS
NOT INSCRIPTION.

Crossing into a starred form changes the evidence class. The interface marks that crossing, preserves confidence, and never manufactures the next root to make the picture look complete.