PERMANENT SOURCE RECORD
ALL SOURCES ↗BIBLIOGRAPHIC IDENTITYzoega-fja
SOURCE
RECORD.
One work. Every claim that depends on it. No citation without a consequence you can inspect.
9 PUBLIC LINKS INTO THE GRAPH.
This count excludes duplicate dossier-path citations. Open the claims below to see exactly how the source is used.
historical dictionaryzoega-fja
A Concise Dictionary of Old Icelandic — fjá
- AUTHOR / EDITOR
- Geir T. Zoëga
- YEAR
- 1910
- PUBLISHER
- Oxford University Press · digital transcription
- DOI
- Not recorded
- SOURCE TYPE
- historical dictionary
- EXTERNAL RECORD
- OPEN ORIGINAL ↗
010
CONTRARIAN TRUTH CLAIMS
RANKED REVEALS THAT CITE THIS SOURCE
No ranked contrarian reveal currently cites this source.
025
SCHOLARLY DISAGREEMENT
DISPUTE POSITIONS THAT CITE THIS SOURCE
opensupportsprobable
Did fía become fjá at one exactly recoverable moment?
No exact date or complete phonetic sequence is established. Zoëga calls fía the early form and ONP cross-references it, which supports a historical surface relation but not a point event.
Headword note: early form fíaPublishes the historical surface relation.
opensupportsprobable
Can the exact pronunciation and path into fjá be recovered?
Not completely. Vowel quantity, optional glide, contraction, surface variation, and poetic normalization belong to historical analysis rather than recorded audio.
Early fía, fjá, and reflexive fjástPublishes surface variation without a recording or complete transition series.
resolvedsupportsestablished
Was Old Norse fjá a verb?
Yes. ONP classifies it as a poetic verb; Cleasby, Zoëga, and Fritzner all gloss it as hate and document finite or reflexive grammar.
fjá entry: verb to hateIndependently classifies and glosses the verb.
resolvedsupportsestablished
Is fiásk in Skírnismál 33 a separate verb?
No on the reviewed evidence. Cleasby, Zoëga, and Fritzner classify the reflexive under fjá, and the teaching text preserves þik skal Freyr fiásk.
Reflexive fjást e-nClassifies the reflexive under fjá.
resolvedsupportsestablished
Is the possible runic inscription shown on modern dictionary pages a historical attestation?
No. It is a generated transliteration widget, not a cited inscription, object, shelfmark, or manuscript record.
Modern page widget: possible runic inscriptionIndependently shows the same generator behavior.
031
CANONICAL RELATIONSHIP CLAIMS
EDGES THAT CITE THIS SOURCE
EDGE 1219supportsprobable
fjá → fía
Old Norse → Old Norse · historical surface development
- SOUND
- The early form fía develops into fjá through North Germanic contraction and glide-vowel remodeling. The reviewed lexical sources publish the earlier and later surfaces but do not expose a dated sequence of intermediate written forms.
- MEANING
- The verb remains in the hate field; active and reflexive constructions distribute the participant structure differently without creating separate prehistoric roots.
- SCHOLAR / EDITOR
- Geir T. Zoëga · Dictionary of Old Norse Prose editors
Headword fjá: early form fía; verb to hate; reflexive fjástPublishes the earlier form and the active-versus-reflexive grammar.
040
LEXICAL ATTESTATIONS
WITNESSES REPORTED BY THIS SOURCE
No lexical witness currently cites this source.
052
COMPARATIVE EVIDENCE
COGNATES, DESCENDANTS, AND RELATIVES
061
GEOGRAPHIC AND TEMPORAL CLAIMS
JOURNEY STAGES THAT CITE THIS SOURCE
stage 3supports
Old Norse linguistic horizon
Supplies the source-reported Old Norse surface sequence.
Headword fjá: early form fía · broad070
NON-GENEALOGICAL CONNECTIONS
HISTORICAL CONTEXT, KEPT SEPARATE
No non-genealogical context link currently cites this source.
081
WORD-FAMILY REUSE
DOSSIERS THAT DEPEND ON THIS SOURCE
1 entry-scoped citations map reviewed dossier paths onto the canonical claims above.