*SET-U

CANONICAL RELATIONSHIP RECORD

COVERAGE LEDGER ↗
EDGE / 1090knowledge boundaryboundary

A CLAIM
YOU CAN AUDIT.

A relationship—not a generated explanation. Both endpoints, every editorial field, every citation, and every dossier reuse are preserved below.

CHILD / LATER FORM / reconstructedProto-Indo-European · proposed Proto-Indo-European base · grief pain hatred base

*ḱeh₂d-

a proposed base glossed with grief, pain, and hatred

OPEN NODE 1096 ↗
DESCENDS FROM→
PARENT / EARLIER FORM / boundaryBeyond secure reconstruction · before the disputed Indo-European proposal · hatred deep boundary

UNKNOWN

No securely accepted ancestor or original concrete meaning is currently known beyond the reviewed Germanic family.

OPEN NODE 1097 ↗
01

THE COMPLETE RELATIONSHIP

EVERY FIELD, NOT A FAIRY TALE

SOUND CHANGE

No older form or uniquely recoverable concrete meaning is promoted beyond the disputed *ḱeh₂d- proposal.

SEMANTIC CHANGE

The trail ends before a convenient story about love and hate, pursuit, grief, or care is mistaken for established prehistory.

CHRONOLOGY

No separate chronology note is attached beyond the endpoint date ranges.

SCHOLAR / EDITORIAL AUTHORITY

SET-U editorial boundary · Anatoly Liberman

CONFIDENCE

boundary — The secure path reaches Germanic; the displayed PIE lane is a qualified proposal, not a settled endpoint.

EDITORIAL STATUS

reviewed

02

CITATION REGISTER

SOURCES ON THIS EDGE

S01
Hate — definition, etymology, and first known useEtymology note: semantic relations are far from transparent

Defines why secure ancestry cannot simply be extended through the proposal.

supportsAUDIT SOURCE ↗ORIGINAL ↗
S02
The shortest history of hatred continued and partly concludedConclusion: pursuit looks promising, broader comparisons remain murky

Supports an explicit knowledge boundary rather than a fabricated original meaning.

supportsAUDIT SOURCE ↗ORIGINAL ↗
03

EDITORIAL REUSE

WHERE THIS CLAIM APPEARS

RELATION / 960hatred

*ḱeh₂d- → UNKNOWN

OPEN DOSSIER ↗