WITNESS / 387
ALL WITNESSES ↗PERMANENT ATTESTATION RECORDWITNESS / 387
OBJECT
BEFORE
CLAIM.
THE PRIMARY OBJECT WAS NOT CHECKED.
ONW says most editions read fiunt, while Heyne proposed an error for diufil and both readings can represent Latin diabolus. The dossier preserves the textual dispute and does not promote this as a secure earliest Devil token.
Old Dutch901–1000; surviving copy circa 1598proposed
fīunt / fīant
Wachtendonck Psalms glosses, Habakkuk 3:5
“Dfiunt (l. fiunt ?). diabolus”
- WITNESS TYPE
- Source-reported corpus record
- YEAR
- Not fixed
- LOCATOR
- Sense 2; WPs glosses, Abac. 003,05; South Lower Rhine
- REPOSITORY
- Not recorded
- SHELFMARK / OBJECT ID
- Not recorded
- FACSIMILE
- Not linked
- DIRECT INSPECTION
- No
- CONFIDENCE
- proposed
WORD DOSSIERvijand ↗
CANONICAL FORM NODENODE 1214 ↗
01
BIBLIOGRAPHIC PROVENANCE
THE SOURCE BEHIND THE CLAIM
- TITLE
- Oudnederlands Woordenboek — fīunt
- AUTHOR
- Instituut voor de Nederlandse Taal editorial team
- YEAR
- 2009
- PUBLISHER
- Instituut voor de Nederlandse Taal
- SOURCE TYPE
- historical dictionary
- CITATION KEY
- onw-fiunt