PERMANENT SOURCE RECORD
ALL SOURCES ↗SOURCE
RECORD.
One work. Every claim that depends on it. No citation without a consequence you can inspect.
5 PUBLIC LINKS INTO THE GRAPH.
This count excludes duplicate dossier-path citations. Open the claims below to see exactly how the source is used.
Heliand — BSB Cgm 25, scan 152, hotean locus
- AUTHOR / EDITOR
- Bayerische Staatsbibliothek · Münchener DigitalisierungsZentrum
- YEAR
- 875
- PUBLISHER
- Bayerische Staatsbibliothek
- DOI
- Not recorded
- SOURCE TYPE
- digitized primary source
- EXTERNAL RECORD
- OPEN ORIGINAL ↗
CONTRARIAN TRUTH CLAIMS
RANKED REVEALS THAT CITE THIS SOURCE
The hostile adjective may belong to whet and threat, not hate—and its starred lemma still has a nominative.
Köbler's Old Saxon entry reports five written readings at three Heliand loci, including nominative hotie, huotia, and huoti, yet heads the entry hōti*. The asterisk therefore cannot be explained away as “no nominative survives.” More radically, the sources split at the root. UT groups hōti with hatōn and heti under the inherited hate etymon k̑ād-. Köbler's same entry cross-references hatōn but reconstructs a different *hwōtja- adjective beside *hwōtō “threat” and Pokorny's *kʷē̆d- / *kʷō̆d- family of boring, pricking, sharpening, whetting, and inciting. Munich hotie and hotean are directly visible in contexts of hostile minds and hostile intent; Cotton huotia, huotian, and huoti remain source-reported. The unveiling is not “hostility secretly means sharpened hate.” It is that rigorous etymology sometimes reveals two irreconcilable maps where a flat dictionary would print one arrow.
*kʷē̆d- / *kʷō̆d- → *hwōtō → *hwōtja- → hōti
Cgm 25 scan 152, hoteanDirectly verifies the second Munich surface form.
SCHOLARLY DISAGREEMENT
DISPUTE POSITIONS THAT CITE THIS SOURCE
Is Old Saxon hōti supported by attested forms?
Yes. Köbler reports five written inflectional readings at three Heliand loci, and Munich hotie and hotean are directly visible.
Cgm 25 scan 152, hoteanDirectly verifies the second Munich form.
Was Munich hotean directly inspected?
Yes. Cgm 25 scan 152 visibly preserves hotean in the phrase thurh hotean hugi.
Full-resolution Cgm 25 scan 152Provides the directly inspected artifact.
CANONICAL RELATIONSHIP CLAIMS
EDGES THAT CITE THIS SOURCE
LEXICAL ATTESTATIONS
WITNESSES REPORTED BY THIS SOURCE
hōti
Heliand manuscript M, accusation before Pilate
OPEN WITNESS 499 ↗COMPARATIVE EVIDENCE
COGNATES, DESCENDANTS, AND RELATIVES
GEOGRAPHIC AND TEMPORAL CLAIMS
JOURNEY STAGES THAT CITE THIS SOURCE
Corvey catalog attribution
Supplies the second directly inspected Munich manuscript form.
Cgm 25 scan 152, hotean · approximateNON-GENEALOGICAL CONNECTIONS
HISTORICAL CONTEXT, KEPT SEPARATE
WORD-FAMILY REUSE