PERMANENT SOURCE RECORD
ALL SOURCES ↗SOURCE
RECORD.
One work. Every claim that depends on it. No citation without a consequence you can inspect.
7 PUBLIC LINKS INTO THE GRAPH.
This count excludes duplicate dossier-path citations. Open the claims below to see exactly how the source is used.
Althochdeutsches Wörterbuch — haz, Old Saxon hetias in the Saxon Confession
- AUTHOR / EDITOR
- Saxon Academy of Sciences in Leipzig · Trier Center for Digital Humanities
- YEAR
- 2026
- PUBLISHER
- Saxon Academy of Sciences in Leipzig
- DOI
- Not recorded
- SOURCE TYPE
- historical dictionary
- EXTERNAL RECORD
- OPEN ORIGINAL ↗
CONTRARIAN TRUTH CLAIMS
RANKED REVEALS THAT CITE THIS SOURCE
The token is attested even though the dictionary headword wears an asterisk.
Köbler heads the Old Saxon noun hėti* but lists written accusative and dative heti plus genitive hetias beneath it. The exact Munich Heliand token is directly visible in the clause rîkioro manno heti endi harmquidi. The dictionary count three also hides a second distinction: it means three lexical loci, while Heliand 1322 survives with M, C, and V readings, producing five reported witness readings across the dossier. The star therefore belongs to an editorial headword layer; it does not erase the attested surface or turn Old Saxon into Proto-Germanic. The visible Heliand context is endured hostility or persecution, while the Saxon Confession groups hetias with malice, envy, and slander. Even the inherited grammar stays open: Fulk and Köbler use an i-stem analysis, whereas Pfeifer calls the wider noun an old es/os-stem.
*ḱeh₂d- → *ḱh₂d-es- → *hatiz- → heti
haz entry and Saxon Confession source keySupplies genitive hetias, its confession context, and tenth-century text date.
SCHOLARLY DISAGREEMENT
DISPUTE POSITIONS THAT CITE THIS SOURCE
Were the Cotton, Vatican, Genesis, and Saxon Confession objects directly inspected?
No. Their readings are source-reported through Köbler or the Academy dictionary; no exact primary-object pixels were inspected for those four rows.
Saxon Confession hetias recordSupplies an edited lexical record rather than inspected manuscript pixels.
Does the Heliand persecution context define every use of the noun?
No. Genesis supplies a different grammatical environment, and the Saxon Confession places hetias among confessed wrongs beside malice, envy, and slander. One line cannot define the whole lexeme.
Saxon Confession sequence containing hetiasAdds a confessible-wrong context distinct from Heliand persecution.
Does the Saxon Confession really contain genitive singular hetias?
Yes. The Academy dictionary prints hetias as genitive singular at S 318,8 = Wa 16,11 and quotes the full sequence ik iuhu nithas endi auunstes, hetias endi bisprakias.
haz entry: hetias gen. sg.; S 318,8 = Wa 16,11; full quotationSupplies grammar, locator, and exact edited context.
CANONICAL RELATIONSHIP CLAIMS
EDGES THAT CITE THIS SOURCE
LEXICAL ATTESTATIONS
WITNESSES REPORTED BY THIS SOURCE
heti
Saxon Confession genitive occurrence
OPEN WITNESS 496 ↗COMPARATIVE EVIDENCE
COGNATES, DESCENDANTS, AND RELATIVES
haz
Old High Germanthe collateral masculine noun compared by the Academy dictionary
GEOGRAPHIC AND TEMPORAL CLAIMS
JOURNEY STAGES THAT CITE THIS SOURCE
Old Saxon Genesis and Saxon Confession records
Dates and quotes the confession record without claiming direct manuscript inspection.
Saxon Confession source key: tenth century; S 318,8 = Wa 16,11 · broadNON-GENEALOGICAL CONNECTIONS
HISTORICAL CONTEXT, KEPT SEPARATE
WORD-FAMILY REUSE