*SET-U

GRAPH-WIDE SEARCH

MEASURE THE GRAPH ↗

NOT JUST A DICTIONARY LOOKUP

6 EVIDENCE COLLECTIONS

SEARCH
THE GRAPH.

Find a modern word—or search sideways through reconstructed roots, historical forms, meanings, languages, scholars, sources, claims, disputes, and witnesses.

WIKTIONARY VIA KAIKKI / WIKTEXTRACT

Imported dictionary evidence

SOURCE-IMPORTED · UNREVIEWED

These are source reports, not reviewed *SET-U ancestry. A list of templates or numbered etymologies is not an ancestor chain. Scholarly disagreements remain in the original source text.

35,981 English word records · 45,491 etymology sections in this online subset

PARTIAL ENGLISH COVERAGE · FULL CORPUS REMAINS LOCAL

No exact match for “Dialect” in this partial English subset. That does not mean the full research corpus—or linguistic scholarship—has no record. Check the original dictionary entry ↗

From Wiktionary contributors; extracted by Tatu Ylonen / Wiktextract / Kaikki.org. Extraction source · CC-BY-SA-4.0. Selected source text is reformatted for display; language and section identity are retained.

Source dump: 2026-10-01 · Extraction: 2026-10-30. These dates identify a dump snapshot, not an individual page revision.

Snapshot checksums and coverage
SOURCE SHA-256
5ff2c072f8099f2d2ce484bd6957bf179f046d2ad37bc36555edf8bb84cb5291
CORPUS SHA-256
c4c2a77325141846709230e11c2959332acd630d53e52905b72d36211251b081
IMPORT RUN
73216b9a9b78ed3830994bf853103716f5a4dc57099e371e9f8fdc468facca26
SUBSET SELECTION
English-only: shortest normalized query first, then binary lexical order; complete word-language and case-variant groups only. This is a bounded online subset, not the full acquired corpus.

INDEPENDENT SOURCE LIBRARY

More sources for this spelling

These are spelling matches, not a claim of identical senses or agreement. Historical accounts retain their own editions and limits; none is automatically promoted into reviewed ancestry.

Browse the independently attributed sources →
WIKTIONARY / SOURCE LOOKUPEXTERNAL · COMMUNITY EDITED

Dialect

No extractable etymology was found for this exact spelling. Open the original dictionary entry ↗

Read the complete entry and references ↗ · Contribute a cited dossier

14REVIEWED RESULTS
1WORD DOSSIERS
0HISTORICAL NODES
1SOURCES
11CLAIMS
1WITNESSES
01

MODERN ENTRY POINTS

WORD DOSSIERS

1
02

ATTESTED / RECONSTRUCTED / BOUNDARY

HISTORICAL FORMS

0

No reviewed record in this collection contains “dialect.” Absence describes this graph, not all of linguistic scholarship.

03

WHERE INTERPRETATION IS TESTED

CLAIMS & DISPUTES

11

SCHOLARLY DISPUTES / 11

openprobableposition text

Can the exact pronunciation of frēond be heard or uniquely recovered?

No. The displayed IPA is a normalized scholarly approximation across written dialect evidence, not one recorded Old English voice.

openproposedposition text

Is hatia specifically East Old Frisian, West Old Frisian, or both?

The reviewed sources do not flatten the dialect evidence. Popkema marks hetia as West Lauwers, Corpus Oudfries places relevant records in West Old Frisian texts, while StarLing labels hatia East Frisian.

resolvedestablishedposition text

Can the pronunciation of Old English frēond and Proto-Germanic *frijōnd- be heard exactly?

No. Historical phonology supports normalized approximations, not audio recordings or one recoverable dialect realization.

resolvedestablishedposition text

Are frēond, frīond, and frīand separate ancestral words?

No separate lexemes are established here. OED treats them as dialectal reflexes: ēo chiefly West Saxon and Mercian, īo chiefly Northumbrian and Kentish, and īa Kentish unrounding.

resolvedestablishedposition text

Does the fiógaþ manuscript variant establish exact Old English pronunciation?

No. A spelling variant supports textual variation but does not by itself fix one phonetic value across dialects, periods, and inflections.

resolvedestablishedposition text

Do fēond, fīond, fīend, and fȳnd name separate words?

No. OED explains unmutated dialect forms and i-mutated inflectional forms inside one inherited paradigm, with later analogical remodeling.

resolvedestablishedposition text

Are fiiant, fîjant, fiunt, fient, fiand, fiund, and fiend separate ancestry branches?

Not in AWB's article. They are form, spelling, dialectal, and inflectional records inside one headword history, with a few individual corrupt or ambiguous tokens separately flagged.

resolvedestablishedposition text

Can the exact Old High German pronunciation be recovered from the citation forms?

Not from the reviewed records alone. Quantity marks and consonant spellings encode scholarly analyses, but no audio exists and the dossier does not infer one dialect-neutral phonetic realization.

resolvedestablishedposition text

Is Doric κᾶδος a different etymological word?

No separate lexeme is established. LSJ prints it as the Doric form of κῆδος and cites it in Pindar.

resolvedestablishedposition text

Does the Ionic-Attic η beside Doric ā prove the whole Indo-European route?

No. The dialectal vowel pattern supports Greek-internal history, but it does not by itself establish the proposed root, suffix, or non-Greek cognates.

resolvedestablishedposition text

Can κῆδος be pinned to one exact birthplace?

No. The word spans dialects, genres, authors, and a long manuscript tradition. No reviewed evidence identifies one innovation point.

CONTRARIAN TRUTHS / 0

04

BOOKS / DICTIONARIES / ARTICLES / DATABASES

SOURCES

1
05

FIRST USES & HISTORICAL OBJECTS

ATTESTATION WITNESSES

1
06

SEARCH IS DISCOVERY, NOT PROOF

EVERY RESULT OPENS A PERMANENT EVIDENCE RECORD.

Matching text only locates a record. It does not raise confidence, settle a dispute, establish cognacy, or turn a source report into direct inspection. Follow the result into its citations and editorial limits.