*SET-U

THE JOURNEY ATLAS

TIMELINE ATLAS ↗

MAP THE ROUTE / KEEP THE LIMIT

PLACE → PERIOD → TRANSFORMATION

WORDS HAVE
ADDRESSES.

Trace where a word’s reviewed history passed through—and see every broad, global, or uncertain stage that cannot honestly be reduced to one point.

THE GEOGRAPHIC CONTRACT

A ROUTE IS A MODEL.
NOT A GPS TRACE.

Regional pins locate reviewed cultural stages. Approximate pins locate broad reconstructed or contact regions. Global stages stay unpinned. Every route preserves its full editorial sequence; only directly cited, explicitly bounded stages also enter the cross-word Timeline Atlas.

959REVIEWED ROUTE STAGES

Ordered inside 214 complete dossier journeys.

230HONEST MAP POINTS

231 coordinate pairs exist; global placements are suppressed.

729NO SINGLE PIN

Broad, global, uncertain, or not honestly reducible to one point.

959DIRECTLY CITED STAGES

1324 claim-level citations; every remaining stage is a frontier task.

578NUMERIC TIME BOUNDS

Source-backed stages now join the cross-word Timeline Atlas.

381TIME BOUNDS WITHHELD

Historic labels remain readable without being parsed into false years.

00

FILTER THE ROUTE ARCHIVE

WHERE DID THE WORD GO?

1 ROUTES / 8 MATCHING STAGES

Filters select complete word journeys when any stage matches. The map and route card then preserve the surrounding stages, so a search result never becomes a historically amputated dot.

01

THE REVIEWED GEOGRAPHIC LAYER

HOTI ON THE MAP

1 PLOTTED STAGES
1 plotted stages in matching word journeyshōti, stage 6: Corvey catalog attribution — Cgm 25, second half of the ninth century6
REGIONAL PLACEMENTAPPROXIMATE / RECONSTRUCTED REGIONGLOBAL OR UNLOCATED — NO SINGLE PIN

This is not a GPS trace. Lines appear only when adjacent stages in one selected route both have defensible points. A global stage is not pinned even when a legacy coordinate names the route’s point of departure. Missing locations break the line.

02

ROUTE-BY-ROUTE SEQUENCE TIMELINES

1 MATCHING WORD JOURNEYS

PAGE 1 / 1
208

REVIEWED WORD JOURNEY

hōti

OPEN DOSSIER ↗
8STAGES1HONEST PINS7NO SINGLE PIN
  1. 01
    Köbler and Pokorny *kʷē̆d- / *kʷō̆d- laneNO SINGLE PIN

    Proposed Indo-European bore-prick horizon

    One competing route connects the adjective through threat and Germanic whet or incite comparanda. A reconstructed linguistic horizon is not one archaeological point.

    2 DIRECT CITATIONS ↗
  2. 02
    UT k̑ād- lane crosswalked to the reviewed *ḱeh₂d- proposalNO SINGLE PIN

    Proposed Indo-European hate-grief horizon

    The other route places hōti with the hate family. Its semantic unity and exact reconstruction remain qualified.

    1 DIRECT CITATIONS ↗
  3. 03
    competing *hwōtja- and *hatiz- parent analysesNO SINGLE PIN

    Proto-Germanic linguistic horizon

    Cross-source disagreement begins before the Old Saxon record: one source reconstructs a threat-related adjective, another classifies the form with hate.

    2 DIRECT CITATIONS ↗
  4. 04
    no reconciled parent before the competing routesNO SINGLE PIN

    Unresolved deep boundary

    The trail ends without choosing one original essence or inventing an older common node.

    2 DIRECT CITATIONS ↗
  5. 05
    work created circa 830–840; place of poetic origin unknownNO SINGLE PIN

    Old Saxon Heliand textual horizon

    Three lexical loci belong to the work layer, distinct from the dates and locations of the surviving manuscript objects.

    2 DIRECT CITATIONS ↗
  6. 06
    Cgm 25, second half of the ninth centuryapproximate placement

    Corvey catalog attribution

    The Munich witness directly preserves hotie and hotean. The point represents a catalog attribution, not the adjective's birthplace.

    3 DIRECT CITATIONS ↗
  7. 07
    Cotton Caligula A VII, mid or second half of the tenth centuryNO SINGLE PIN

    English Cotton manuscript transmission

    Köbler reports huotia, huotian, and huoti from manuscript C. None of those three exact page images was inspected in this review.

    2 DIRECT CITATIONS ↗
  8. 08
    later höt or höte comparandaNO SINGLE PIN

    Middle Low German comparison horizon

    Köbler supplies later hostile, bad, or violent adjectives as comparanda, not as direct proof of one exact Old Saxon-to-Middle-Low-German token chain.

    1 DIRECT CITATIONS ↗
03

WHAT THIS MAP CAN AND CANNOT CLAIM

GEOGRAPHIC HONESTY IS PART OF THE DATA.

REGIONAL

A defensible cultural or linguistic region can be plotted, but the point summarizes an area rather than an exact address.

APPROXIMATE

A reconstructed homeland or contact zone is placed only as a broad visual orientation and uses a distinct dashed marker.

BROAD / GLOBAL

A distributed network, era, or world language has no honest single coordinate. It remains in the sequence and off the map.

TIME BOUNDS

Directly cited stages may carry exact, range, century, circa, open, or before bounds. Unbounded prose stays unparsed.

SOURCE FRONTIER

959 stages have claim-level citations and 578 have defensible numeric bounds. Every uncited or unbounded stage remains visible unfinished work.